Quote:
Originally Posted by ChronoGrl
The "cis" label is as common in the discussion as the "trans" label is, so it's really not that unreasonable to request it be included. And you missed the point that by excluding "cis man" then you are insinuating that "trans man" is in opposition to and not "man," which is not true.
Also, if you read my post as me "telling you what you are"... You're wrong.
Oops. Told you what you are again.  |
I disagree. Whether or not trans is as important as cis, it is much more in the awareness of the general public than cis. Its not an unreasonable request, but this was just a quickly typed up poll for a passing interest.
Picking one option that I excluded doesn't fit the narrative. There are, as Roifallo posted, many many more genders than the ones I put in the poll. Am I then invalidating all of those genders and insinuating many many many different things? I do not think so.
I do concede it probably would have been better to just ask the question without the poll.
Lastly, there is no need to condescend me.