I have a question about NOTLD
 

Where does Return of the Living Dead fall into place? I know they have Night of the LKiving Dead, and the sequel is Dawn of the Dead, followed by Day of the Dead. But what about Return of the Living Dead and Return of the Living Dead 3? Do they have anything to do with the original Night of the Living Dead?

Re: I have a question about NOTLD
 

they have nothing to do with the originals.

when they were splitting up the rights to the original film, the co-writer john russo kept the rights to use the term "living dead" while george kept the rights to "night". russo wrote a screenplay called return of the living dead but it was completely rewrote to become the film we see today.

"it was completly rewrote to become the film we say today" what dawn of the dead?

The rights to these films are everywhere!!! Day of the deads had a remake by a completly diffrent company to the Dawn of the dead remake!!!

Has anyone seen "Children of the living dead" ...

talking about return of the living dead

So techinically Return of the Living Dead was the sequel, but no one considered it the sequel because George Romero went an made Dawn of the Dead.

I saw Return of the Living Dead 3 and it was horibble. Its just about some guy who brings his girlfriend back to life. It sux so much, their arn't even dead people in it.

it has nothing to do with the romero films. even if it was it was made the same year as day of the dead, 7 years after dawn.

Yes, it was horrible.

The "Return" series has nothing to do with Romero's series. In the 1st ROTLD they even mention NOTLD as a movie based on an actual event. Remember?

nothing to do with any of the dead trilogy. Ment to be a spoof but not associated with any romero films at all