Dreamcatcher movie review
 

Dreamcatcher review-spoilers herein [details]

DreamCatcher = Poo
 

If they show movies in hell, DreamCatcher is on the Ultra Screen. *shudder* Worst movie of 2003 by far...

Re: DreamCatcher = Poo
 

I couldn't agree with you more.

i couldn't agree with the review more. they should've had less bang-bang explosion crap and more phsychological action.

Why did they change it?
 

:mad: Why can't they ever get a King book right? The movie was great and followed the book very well, until...

...halfway through some miserable King hating freak shat upon the story.

Stupid, lame, not scary. I never read the book but I'm sure it was better than this mess. It's ridiculous. Nothing redeeming. One of the worst movies of 2003.

Gee...What a sweet thread...I never realized there were so many Stephen King fans here:rolleyes: ...

Yes, I agree, the movie definitely could have been better...However, it still wasn't as bad as some of the other recent crap...It certainly isn't the WORST, by far...Anyway, my kids loved it and have already watched it 4 times...

As always...The book is far better than the movie:)

I actually did think this was pretty much the worst King movie adaption. I mean considering the talent and resources there it all just went horribly wrong didn't it. It's easy to slam the old low budget King efforst but this really had no excuse to be as crappy as it was.

They give Stephen King a bad name... pity