Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Horror.com General Forum (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Digitally Filmed Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6051)

Arioch 05-19-2004 11:01 PM

Digitally Filmed Movies
 
I really like the super quality of movies filmed totally digitally, ie. 28 days later...

Ok not whether or not you like 28 days later:rolleyes: we've done that thread to death, but how do you like the LOOK of films done digitally?

I think it looks pretty good quality wise, and gives a different feal to the film, any takers?

Also anyone else know of any other films done entirely digitally? i think 28days later is the only one if seen....

Arioch 05-20-2004 05:29 PM

Damn, NO ONE??

Come on atleast SOMEONE else has seen 28 days later and can appreciate the all digital filming of that movie.....i hope.....

Evis™ 05-20-2004 05:43 PM

28 Days Later blew.

Biggeset waste of $20.

Digital movies blow aswell. Why fake slice someone's head off, when you can actually do it? Nothing like the real thing.

Unfortunately, no director has had big enough balls to actually kill someone.

So I guess all horror movies blow in some way or another.

Plaguewind 05-20-2004 05:52 PM

Well, my friend, I'm not into filming techniques, but I must agree 28 Days Later is visually awesome... Anyway, it is the only one that I (now) KNOW to have been filmed this way, so I don't have a great basis for comparisons... Especially because of that, I'll also be glad if someone tells of more movies digitally made...

Arioch 05-21-2004 06:39 PM

Agreed. I'd like to see more digital movies, they just have a super clean yet grainy look to them, i'd REALLY like to see one on a HDTV, but alas, the funding aludes me....

jay o2 waster 05-21-2004 06:44 PM

i loved 28 days and loved the digitl filming

Egekrusher 05-21-2004 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Evis™
28 Days Later blew.

Biggeset waste of $20.

Digital movies blow aswell. Why fake slice someone's head off, when you can actually do it? Nothing like the real thing.

Unfortunately, no director has had big enough balls to actually kill someone.

So I guess all horror movies blow in some way or another.

You're missing the point. We're not talking special effects, we're talking about films that are recorded use digital video cameras, so they never get the quality reduction that comes with recording onto standard film. It makes a big difference.

kpropain 05-21-2004 11:10 PM

Yeah the filming quality was fucking excellent.

Don't know of any other digitally filmed movies though.

Arioch 05-21-2004 11:10 PM

I'll agree....for the block......

orangestar 05-22-2004 06:52 PM

The quality of digital is great. But it doesnt make the movie good. 28 Days Later sucked.

Sistinas 05-22-2004 07:13 PM

28 Days Later kicks ass and the digital filming in it is great.

orangestar 05-22-2004 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sistinas
28 Days Later kicks ass and the digital filming in it is great.
No one can ever agree on this movie. You either hated it or loved it.

Sistinas 05-22-2004 07:15 PM

I like the fact that it seemed so fresh and original.

Sam The Egg 05-22-2004 10:30 PM

on the Once Upon A Time In Mexico DVD there's a pretty interesting video clip of Robert Rodriguez talking about using digital film instead of regular type at a college

Arioch 05-22-2004 10:33 PM

Agreed on the love it or hate it aspect of 28 days later...

Im a lover myself....anywho...

So sam is Once upon a time in mexico filmed digitally then??:confused:

Sam The Egg 05-22-2004 10:35 PM

I think they filmed parts of it digitally and parts of it with film

Arioch 05-22-2004 10:38 PM

Is it easy to tell which parts are digital or is it filmed to look all the same?

Sam The Egg 05-22-2004 10:39 PM

it varies. There's parts where it's identical, and then there are parts where you can tell they filmed it digitally.

Arioch 05-22-2004 10:40 PM

For real, i'll have to check that out now...

Sam The Egg 05-22-2004 10:41 PM

I'll have to watch the thing again and post what all he said, because he gave a bunch of reasons why digital is better than film

Arioch 05-22-2004 10:46 PM

Id really like to see more movies done this way....just for comparason ya know? i think it can lend alot of atmosphere to a movie, but it also just looks so damn good....

Plaguewind 05-23-2004 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by orangestar
The quality of digital is great. But it doesnt make the movie good. 28 Days Later sucked.
Well, friend, I don't think anyone said it does make the movie... Of course, it makes easier to get some pretty good visual effects, but a movie should never rely ONLY on this...

kpropain 06-21-2004 10:34 AM

Bump:rolleyes:


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 AM.