Osama found previously?!
 

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/20...nt_1336744.htm

Looks legit, appearntly they found Osama, but bush is waiting to release the news till further in the election year.

Kinda makes you think, what kind of a president holds this news untill he sees feels fit to use it for his own personal gain.

That news is incorrect. It is neither 100% unbiased nor factual.

Not to mention if it were real, and someone.... such as yourself... found the article on the internet, something tells me it would be national by about this time. Regardless if Bush wanted to keep it underwraps.

yeah u think it would b all over radio and such weather bush wanted to or not. and if it would have been leaked then wouldn't bush have addressed it also

Yeah, apparently Unit can't distinguish what real news is or isn't.

well as soon as i saw it i was lie its a fake

Still angry are we RE?

True, theres no way to tell if its unbiased, but the fact that its in a Chinease newspaper is a good inclination that it has no afiliation with the U.S.

Bush heads up the military, and could tell them to keep it hush-hush if he wanted. Which I don't doubt he would want to do. So it is possible that the U.S. wouldn't know, the news only gets what the military tells them when it comes to US/Iraq affairs.

Look at the post, comes from IRNA, Iran's national news agency.

Bush's supporters on here are going to declare it a lie weather it is not. But come November, I'll be waiting to say I told you so.

Never heard of reporters, or tabloids apparently, have we?

If you found it on the internet, I'm sure many many others have, and when they did they probably alerted a news source.

The military isn't the only source of information? :confused:

:confused: What should make me care? Because I'll let you in on a little secret... I don't.

*sigh* sometimes I wonder why I bother with you RE, but then I remember some people have to be dragged into the light kicking and screaming.

Check the website it's on, hardly looks like a grocery store tabloid.

i will also b waiting for nov. to say "i told u so" cuz this story IMO is false.

Well as long as were both waiting...:p

RE I never said you would care, simply saying that to Bush's supporters, I frankly don't care about any of your opinions what so ever.

.... You're not very smart.

My point being, tabloids, and other news reports, would have picked up the information on THAT website, and did research on their own... Or do you not understand that? Was it really that difficult making that connection? Sheesh...

I heard this on the tv the other day, it was meant to be a joke:rolleyes:

I believe him....You can trust everything you find on the internet, regardless of source, right?:rolleyes:

I wouldnt be surprised at all to see bush pull some shit like this come election time. Hes falling in the polls because, while the majority of americans think it was the right thing to do by going to war, the majority are upset that we were lied to about the reasons we did so.

We will see tho...

i find it interesting that you are posting this UNIT

i mentioned how that woman suffered a heart attack during the curcifixion scene of passion of christ. you were so quick to question it and even with all the various articles yo still question

then you find this random chinese website, and immediately deem it to be 'legit'

the article itself even says it got its info 'from a reliable source'

im not saying it is or isnt, we'll find ou. but if you can see it im sure many more can, including media

bush may have say over the military but he has not didily shit on the media

and no, i dont support bush. and yes i do think bush would want to keep such news hidden until the election, but it is very shady to me. anyways if it IS true that osama was captured long before he ann ounces it, do you really think the public will be that stupid? look at how easily they jumped onto janet for the titty exposure, just because her album is due in a month. they got on her ass they will DEFINITELY get on his.

its one thing for britney or janet to do it for album sales, but i think (or at least hope) that voters will be smarter.

and how do you know its legit btw... are you chinese? do you know of this website?

Here's another reliable source saying Osama hasn't been captured http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/worl.../01/2003100724

I said it appears to be legit, as in it's not from tabloids, or theonion.com. It very well could be wrong though.

RE's post is just saying that the US denies this, well of coarse the US is going to deny it, otherwise the point of keeping it under wraps would be completely pointless. That article does not say that myne isn't true, but that the US isn't admiting it. If you call a liar a liar, they will lie and tell you otherwise.

:rolleyes:

U r teh dummi indivdaul.

Re if your not going to make complete relevant statments, then STFU.

LOL As if he has EVER made a complete or relevant statement. Let me guess, he called you an asshat?

LIEK OMG "STFU" is not teh complte statmnt. Itz call teh acrynym. TEEHEE.

U r teh dummi. :cool:

Anagrams are still parts of relevant thoughts.

Sff no not an asshat, but has has tried to insult me..note the keyword tried.

Teehee u r teh funni.

Oh, and by the way.

Anagram: A word or phrase formed by reordering the letters of another word or phrase, such as satin to stain.

STFU is not an anagram.

Dummi. :cool:

Ah, I mixed up anagram and acronym, at least I spelled it correctly though.

Well didn't that make you look intelligent? Those are two very different words. :rolleyes:

Pls I spell wrng when I wnt 2. Dummi. :cool:

Not really, Both words are similiar to each other, and I'm sure anyone could make the same mistake if they are not careful.

Either way my mistaken word still makes me look te times as intellegent as you appear to on this forum.

Te times, or ten times?
Intellegent, or intelligent?
You're making me confused here. I only know english. :(

Anagram, acronym.

Ok, I'll give it to you that both start with "a," end with "m," and have seven letters. However, the middle 5 letters are different.
"n-a-g-r-a"
"c-r-o-n-y"

Can you see the difference? Read it, learn it, memorize it, repeat it. Good boy.

U r teh funni wman. :cool:

Typos as said previously.

Now who's the one arguing semantics. Has it really come to that RE? I'll point out an error if I have more of an argument, but you are solely relying on it, it's rather sad really.

Well, considering that's how you tried to win several of your previous battles, I figured I'd show you up in that field too.

I still pwn you in every possible way.

Game over man! GAME OVER!

I win an' u r still teh dummi. :cool:

Not at all, go back to near death experiances and read my posts. I corrected you, but then went on to my MORE important reasons for my argument. You on the other hand, aside from ruining another good post, are simply arguing based on language.

Heh, sorry to break it to you, but too bad all your arguments were less than even half-assed piles of shit.

You should have stuck to only semantics, even that would have gotten you further. :rolleyes:

Thats why you ran out on the Near death experiances thread? Thats why you dropped all your "arguments" and couldn't defend your position anymore?

I doubt that.

Dude, check your PM box.

:confused: That had absolutely no relavance to anything whatsoever. :confused:

I think it is but you that needs to

"Heh, sorry to break it to you, but too bad all your arguments were less than even half-assed piles of shit."
"Well, considering that's how you tried to win several of your previous battles, I figured I'd show you up in that field too."

It is completly relevant because you said my arguments were piles of shit, The near death experiances thread has my arguments in them, in which you could not defend your positions, but merely resorted to petty name calling in other threads, proving that you could not defend your position.

Do I need to post a link so you can find the thread again and re-read it?

K-Your actually saying im the one who needs to STFU, when RE makes THE most useless post on this board? Or perhaps we should all just say "I pwn you all your ugly and I rule" post after every single response on here.

Sorry unit03, I haven't read hardly many post of your's at all but when you jump one of THE FOUR you ask for it. You WILL get the LASHING whether it be from me, Evis, Sam or Rotting, if you ask you will receive.


STFU BOON

tsk...tsk.... Shoulda said what I told ya to. Offering up logical arguments will get you nowhere fast with those 2 fudgepackers. No matter how many times you prove that your right, they will never admit to being WRONG. So winning an argument with them based on facts and common sense is futile.