Final Destination or Final Destination 2?
 

well final destination has a ton more gore so that gets my vote

www.horrorheads.net

1 gets my vote although I wasn't overly crazy about either one.

didn't like either, but i'll have to say the 1rst one ( although the opening scene in 2 kicked ass, imo )

First because it was so original, but the 2nd had more gore.:)

.....
 

The first one was way better. Final Destination 2 could have been better if it was 30 seconds long. Just put all the death scenes back to back. :D

I thought the effects were cool, but that's about it. The beginning of part 2 was really cool tho.

2 but the first had more actors iv heard of (devon sawa,sean william scott) and the only actor i knew in part 2 was ali larter but i liked 2 better

the first

The first one by far. Much creepier. The second one is played more for laughs, it's fun but not a patch on the original.

it was:confused:

The first, definitely. The second had better/more elaborate/graphic deaths, but the first had a sense of style that could not be re-created. I loved the first Final Destination and it's still one of the best "teen" horror movies of that generation, in my opinion at least.

I thought so. People were just scared and jumped and screamed during part one, while people just laughed during part two at the cinema. I don't think 2 is played as serious or realistic as part one. Maybe that's just me then? I didn't mean it was an out and out comedy but more a dark comedy, especially the silly ending.

The 1st one

I've only seen parts of the first one, so I can't really comment. I liked the dark humor aspect of FD2, but it was still a sub-par movie IMHO.

First one was scarier, but FD2 just entertained me soooo much and had a lot better gore.

The first one get some brownie points because it has Tony Todd saying something to the effect of "and you dont wanna fuck with that Mack Daddy" funny stuff.

kind of a tie for me.