Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Horror.com General Forum (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   So...sell me on all the anti-Hollywood stuff (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19119)

The STE 12-04-2005 07:38 PM

So...sell me on all the anti-Hollywood stuff
 
Seems like every 3rd post on this board is someone saying "man, I hate Hollywood!" or "Hollywood is dying!" or "I wish Hollywood would just burn to the ground" or something like that. Seems a bit much to me. Can anybody here think of a convincing arguement against Hollywood, or why one should hate Hollywood?

pinkfloyd45769 12-04-2005 07:44 PM

No way, I looooove Hollywood!!! I think they are all jealous!!! :D

VampiricClown 12-04-2005 07:48 PM

Not me:confused:

The STE 12-04-2005 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by VampiricClown
Not me:confused:
Ok, what, then?

VampiricClown 12-04-2005 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
Ok, what, then?
oops.... my bad ..... Should have specified. I was saying I don't have anything against Hollywood. My apologies:(

The STE 12-04-2005 08:02 PM

Wonderful. All the Hollywood bashing going on, and there's actually a thread ABOUT Hollywood bashing, and it's getting ignored.

AUSTIN316426808 12-04-2005 08:08 PM

Hate to burst your bubble anymore but I don't have a problem with it either.

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 08:16 PM

Re: So...sell me on all the anti-Hollywood stuff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
Seems like every 3rd post on this board is someone saying "man, I hate Hollywood!" or "Hollywood is dying!" or "I wish Hollywood would just burn to the ground" or something like that. Seems a bit much to me. Can anybody here think of a convincing arguement against Hollywood, or why one should hate Hollywood?
Holywood sux all teh gurlz iz bleched an dum!!!!

ps dem movies r teh sux0rs aswell!!11!oneoneoneeleven

The STE 12-04-2005 08:17 PM

Re: Re: So...sell me on all the anti-Hollywood stuff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X
Holywood sux all teh gurlz iz bleched an dum!!!!

ps dem movies r teh sux0rs aswell!!11!oneoneoneeleven

that's a terrible reason

IDrinkYourBlood 12-04-2005 08:35 PM

Re: Re: Re: So...sell me on all the anti-Hollywood stuff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
that's a terrible reason
Im pretty sure she was just fuck'n around. I just want Hollywood to get more creative. With the dribble that been out lately its like they lost there edge. I mean there's been how many remakes to come out this year as well as sequels. I mean do we really need a King Kong remake thats twice as long as the original. Or whats so bad about watching the original. I mean you can call me a stupid basterd but did anyone actually like Robots? or Shark Tales? Anybody? And whats with all the rappers getting into the movie buisness, I mean Get Rich or Die Trying has the word LAME written all over it. Or how about Zethura A.K.A. Jumaji in space. I mean there are some good movies out there, for example The Ice Harvest or Walk the Line or Rent. But sadly most of the theater is taken up by Yours, Mine and Ours and Just Friends. So I just want Hollywood out there to start getting the creative juices flowing again. Bring us movies with impact and heart ach, laughter and joy, Adrenalin and thrills. Not Into the Blue and Chicken Little.

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 08:43 PM

Re: Re: Re: So...sell me on all the anti-Hollywood stuff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
that's a terrible reason
omgz... ur a terribal reezon! :mad: :rolleyes: :o

The STE 12-04-2005 08:57 PM

Ok, remake stuff first, from the Oldboy Remake thread:
"since 1980 there've been around 150 remakes (credit: Box Office Mojo), which seems like a lot, until you consider that there's been over 10,346 movies made since 1980. That means that ~1.5% of the movies since 1980 have been remakes."
Addendum: average of 5 remakes a year. That's not a lot, really.

Zathura was based on a book by the same guy (Chris Van Allsburg) who wrote the book that Jumanji was based on. The blame for that goes to Allsburg.

Like you said; there are good movies out that came from Hollywood. And the bad ones you mentioned are making money. If they didn't make money, there would be no reason to make them.

The STE 12-04-2005 08:58 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: So...sell me on all the anti-Hollywood stuff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X
omgz... ur a terribal reezon! :mad: :rolleyes: :o
Your FACE is a terrible reason!
OMG BURN!

Elvis_Christ 12-04-2005 08:59 PM

Bloated over hyped stars and boring unoriginal films are what pisses off and makes me dubious of Hollywood. The Hollywood establishment (Ritchie Cunningham, the Man Boy Love Association president Steven Speilberg, ect, ect) have put out the same formulaic film over and over again for the last 15 years.
Overblown untalented "stars" (Tom Cruise, Russel Crowe) feed the world's overzealous celebrity worship and transmit values of greed while getting away with murder. Hollywood is a fine example of everything that art shouldn't be.....

Every now and then a Hollywood film does come out to rock the boat and shake things up a bit but those ideas end up reassimilated into the mainstream, dumbed down and cloned endlessly with the sole purpose of making money not art.

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
Ok, remake stuff first, from the Oldboy Remake thread:
"since 1980 there've been around 150 remakes (credit: Box Office Mojo), which seems like a lot, until you consider that there's been over 10,346 movies made since 1980. That means that ~1.5% of the movies since 1980 have been remakes."
Addendum: average of 5 remakes a year. That's not a lot, really.

Zathura was based on a book by the same guy (Chris Van Allsburg) who wrote the book that Jumanji was based on. The blame for that goes to Allsburg.

Like you said; there are good movies out that came from Hollywood. And the bad ones you mentioned are making money. If they didn't make money, there would be no reason to make them.

I have no problem with Hollywood. There have always been good movies, bad movies, and unoriginal movies.

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 09:01 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: So...sell me on all the anti-Hollywood stuff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
Your FACE is a terrible reason!
OMG BURN!

i h8 u 4evah now

dear deadjournal

The STE 12-04-2005 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elvis_Christ
Bloated over hyped stars and boring unoriginal films are what pisses off and makes me dubious of Hollywood. The Hollywood establishment (Ritchie Cunningham, the Man Boy Love Association president Steven Speilberg, ect, ect) have put out the same formulaic film over and over again for the last 15 years.
Overblown untalented "stars" (Tom Cruise, Russel Crowe) feed the world's overzealous celebrity worship and transmit values of greed while getting away with murder. Hollywood is a fine example of everything that art shouldn't be.....

Every now and then a Hollywood film does come out to rock the boat and shake things up a bit but those ideas end up reassimilated into the mainstream, dumbed down and cloned endlessly with the sole purpose of making money not art.

The star/celebrity worship isn't really a Hollywood thing, more of an overal media thing. The type of shit that they put on the E! Network.

And as for "rocking the boat and shaking things up" why is that the exception for all the "same old shit" category? A movie doesn't have to be Pulp Fiction to be a really good movie. To use a previously mentioned example, The Ice Harvest is a very good movie, but isn't some innovative masterpiece.

IDrinkYourBlood 12-04-2005 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X
I have no problem with Hollywood. There have always been good movies, bad movies, and unoriginal movies.
Thats the dumbest damn thing you said all night. :p

Elvis_Christ 12-04-2005 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
The star/celebrity worship isn't really a Hollywood thing
Don't be stupid.

AUSTIN316426808 12-04-2005 09:11 PM

Re: Re: Re: Re: So...sell me on all the anti-Hollywood stuff
 
Quote:

Originally posted by IDrinkYourBlood
Im pretty sure she was just fuck'n around. I just want Hollywood to get more creative. With the dribble that been out lately its like they lost there edge. I mean there's been how many remakes to come out this year as well as sequels. I mean do we really need a King Kong remake thats twice as long as the original. Or whats so bad about watching the original. I mean you can call me a stupid basterd but did anyone actually like Robots? or Shark Tales? Anybody? And whats with all the rappers getting into the movie buisness, I mean Get Rich or Die Trying has the word LAME written all over it. Or how about Zethura A.K.A. Jumaji in space. I mean there are some good movies out there, for example The Ice Harvest or Walk the Line or Rent. But sadly most of the theater is taken up by Yours, Mine and Ours and Just Friends. So I just want Hollywood out there to start getting the creative juices flowing again. Bring us movies with impact and heart ach, laughter and joy, Adrenalin and thrills. Not Into the Blue and Chicken Little.

There are different movies for different people, 4 of the ones you mentioned are kids movies, they have some adult humor and references to keep parents from falling asleep but they're made for kids.

There's great,good,just ok,bad and horrible hollywood movies and that's the way it's always going to be, nothings perfect, hollywood is no exception.

The STE 12-04-2005 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elvis_Christ
Don't be stupid.
Don't be a prick. Is Hollywood PART of it? Yes, I didn't claim that it wasn't. But the celebrity worship crap encompasses far too much for it to be called a Hollywood thing.

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IDrinkYourBlood
Thats the dumbest damn thing you said all night. :p
Oh really? ;)

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
I never did understand the whole "OMG, I JUST MET BRAD PITT!!!" or "OMG, I JUST MET NICOLE KIDMAN!!!" I will admit, it is a thrill to meet a Hollywood star, but it's not world ending events. As far as Hollywood, I dont hate it, but I dont see a big deal with it. Everyone affiliated with the business puts theire clothes on and takes them off the same way we do. Only difference is, they have people do it for them.:p
Being rich would be awesome just so that you could have tons of servants doing jobs you could easily do yourself... Like putting on your own pants. hah

The STE 12-04-2005 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
...takes them off the same way we do. Only difference is, they have people do it for them.:p
*fap fap fap*

The STE 12-04-2005 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
I might consider disrobing you if you payed good enough.:p :p
Screw him, I'll disrobe you for free.

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
Screw him, I'll disrobe you for free.
Sold. You need a suit though.

The STE 12-04-2005 09:34 PM

That argument I agree with. When $4 million is a low budget, something is wrong

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
We wouldnt be needing the suit, Goth-Gurl.;) :p
There will be no fooling around, this is serious business. Put on the suit, pants monkey. :D

AUSTIN316426808 12-04-2005 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
I also think that the bill on filmaking is rediculous. Bruce Willis has been offered 60 mil for a 4th installment to Die Hard. To make the film would cost 300 mil and production would last 6 to 16 months. Where as Million Dollar Baby cost about 100 thou to make and 37 days to produce. MDB earned all 3 actors Oscars. Who's the real Hollywood dream team?

The movie's going to make somewhere around 5 or 6 hundred, that's a 3 hundred profit. It's ridiculous but it's going to make money and that's the ultimate goal.(to the producers)

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
No fooling around? I'll have to pass on that carreer move then. Sorry, sweets.;) :p
Bah, you'll never work in this business again!

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
I understand what their goal is, but it is a risk, the movie might not make all the money back and then some. Lets face it, Die Hard: with a Vengance wasnt exactly a box office blockbuster.
The masses do love helicopter explosions though. :rolleyes:

The STE 12-04-2005 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by AUSTIN316426808
The movie's going to make somewhere around 5 or 6 hundred, that's a 3 hundred profit. It's ridiculous but it's going to make money and that's the ultimate goal.(to the producers)
Ok, but imagine how much money they would make if they made it for only 28 Million (the original Die Hard's budget. It made over 117 mil, btw). Or hell, 90 million (DHwaV's budget). That's over 4 or 5 million profit. 600 profit for a 28 movie is 572 million dollars profit. Why not lower the budget and increase the profits?

The STE 12-04-2005 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X
Bah, you'll never work in this business again!
That's why I'm a volunteer.

Elvis_Christ 12-04-2005 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
Don't be a prick.
Never.

X¤MurderDoll¤X 12-04-2005 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
I'll say again.

I'll still have my dignity.:p

You miss out on the respect and honor associated with such an important position. ;)

The STE 12-04-2005 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
I'll say again.

I'll still have my dignity.:p

And I'll have naked pictuers of murderdoll

Elvis_Christ 12-04-2005 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
I'll say again.

I'll still have my dignity.:p

hmmmmmm 3 more posts away from losin' that? Maybe we should take bets :)

AUSTIN316426808 12-04-2005 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The STE
Ok, but imagine how much money they would make if they made it for only 28 Million (the original Die Hard's budget. It made over 117 mil, btw). Or hell, 90 million (DHwaV's budget). That's over 4 or 5 million profit. 600 profit for a 28 movie is 572 million dollars profit. Why not lower the budget and increase the profits?

I agree with you completely I was just pointing out that it still works. A lower budget would probably bring out a litte more creativeness in the crew instead of them throwing money at every tough fx scene they run into.

The STE 12-04-2005 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
You can get naked pics of anyone off the net. Where's the thrill in that?:rolleyes:
these are of murderdoll. It's different having naked pictuers of someone you "know"

MisterSadistro 12-04-2005 11:15 PM

The sooner Hollywood withers away from it's own uncreativity the better :D . Of course when tv forcefeeds everyone the same crappy reality shows (cheaper to make since no writers), even bad remakes, SNL skits, old sitcom-turned-movies, etc seem like entertainment. People are lemmings and will watch whatever is put in front of them. I pray for another wave of great indie filmmakers to appear as they did in the early 70s. Maybe that will add something to the void.
CK


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:29 PM.