ps3?
 

oops
http://www.misinformer.com/archive/2001/01/15/

I want to add that it will both r0xx0|2 ond Pwn

You need to make one more thread and your life will be complete

i have an itchy 'post new thread' finger

the Xbox 360 will 0wn ps3's ass.... big time.

3 cpu's each running at 3.2GHz. It sports the R500 graphics processor, which runs at 500MHz core, has a 10MB embedded DRAM architecture and a unified shader system. It sports 512MB of GDDR3 RAM, running at 700MHz, which is split between the main system and the graphics. 4 wireless controllers are supported, whilst the system sports a 20GB hard drive and a built-in Media Center Extender.

so what's your point?


.................................................. ........



















just kidding I own a PS2 and an X-box. I got both of them, cause not only am I a horror fanatic, I'm a gaming one two. At one point I had like 10 different gaming systems in my house attached to three different tv sets.

Here's what I had:

2800 Atari (still have and still works)
Nintendo (still have)
Super Nintendo (still have)
Nintendo 64 (in storage i think)
Sega Master System (still have and works)
Sega Genesis
PlayStation
PlayStation2
X-box
Atari Jaguar (still have, only kept it so I can play Aliens vs Predator)

im getting a nintendo game cube (regular.. )

cuz its only $79 and i want to buy mario kart and wario worlds. thats it.

1. PS3 has better hardwear.
2. Stop jacking off to the tech specs cuz they dont mean shit.
3. Xbox 360 looks like a shitty Macintosh Computer (which they have advertised that standing on its side is a "feature")

super mario sunshine was fun too and it got super hard

I agree with that first line.

I need to play Halo 3 no matter what.

It'll all come down to how developers can develop new games and software.... the xbox 360 will have, and microsoft has already with the the current xbox, hardware that has a much bigger ease in game development and porting. Developers for the 360 will be able to utilise the hardware much better, than anything that the game developers design for the ps3. Sony will be hampered by a difficult programing interface, so the hardware won't be utillsed to it's potential... in other words a waste...360 will win.

yeah but what about the games?sony's supposedly using the blue ray discs.

bluray means nothing in performance or graphics wise... it's just next gen development in media storage....i.e higher capacity.

fuck video games

be kinda hard to do that dont you think???

so xbox 2 is an all around better buy?

no, and nobody say it is because its not even out yet. My best bet is with PlayStation, They havent let me down yet.

XBOX is the better buy.

Its just a gimmick. Who here owns a HD TV? :rolleyes:

No one gives a fuck about creative games, they just care about graphics. So nintendo will be out of the question for everyone the next console race.

I say, Fuck PS3. Buy a X-box 360

XBOX sucks ass!

Why is that?

Cuz she wants to be difficult.

*raises hand*

theres no other way... seriously. grainyness is bootyjuice.

Better read your stats again

Processor 3.2Ghz with 3 cores running at 1.0 TFLOPS per second XBOX 360

Processor 3.2Ghz with 7 SPE running at 2.0 TFLOPS per second PS3 (SPE is a simular concept to cores, but note there is 7 of them)

Memory 512GDDR3 @700Mhz 10MB Embedded DRAM XBOX 360

Memory 256MB GDDR3 @700Mhz + 256MB XDR @3.2Ghz (thats floating memory to perform various functions as fast as the central processor, but running seperately)

Graphics 500MHZ ATI XBOX 360

Graphics 550MHZ NVIDIA PS3

Best display Single screen 1080i XBOX 360

Best display Dual screen 1080p PS3

4 joypad inputs XBOX 360

7 joypad ports PS3

EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Paper specs don't equal real performance... can only give a theoretical measure. when games are actually programmed, they dontt use all of any particular feature. that almost never happens. So, what matters is what games you want to play and which controller feels better.

so in the end, WHOS GONNA COME UPJ WITH THE KQQLER GAME?!?!

^_^ and i personally much like the xbox trollers better than ps3. they r big yeh, but they fit ur hand nicely

kinda like those skinny ass cameras. granted, theyre easier to carry around, but theyre not an easy hold........

have you read my other post?

ps3 = teh r0xx0r

http://www.misinformer.com/archive/2...s/ps3front.jpg

back view
http://www.misinformer.com/archive/2001/01/15/

tizzzite games homo
http://www.misinformer.com/archive/2...ps3screens.jpg

ducktroller
http://www.misinformer.com/archive/2.../ps3cfront.jpg
http://www.misinformer.com/archive/2...s/ps3cback.jpg

werd.

I don't really give a shit about the differences in graphics.
I mean, anyone who looks at the next 3 consoles to come out, and says ANY of them don't look good enough, is a whiny little bitch. The comparison will be SO small...it's not really about what it's capable of anyway, it's about how each game WILL use what's available to it. I don't think ANY of the consoles live up to their actual potential.
To me, it really ONLY comes down to the games library. I still prefer ps2 currently for this reason, even though the system I'd personally LEAST likely get (gamecube) had graphics that IMO largely look better and more crisp than ANY of them.

It's gotta be about the games...

agreed!

OH NO> PICS GONE!!!!

If no one cared about the graphics we'ed all still own playstations... I own a PS2 and plan on getting the PS3 not just because of the graphics

It isn't the look of the graphics that impressed me with the next gen consoles, what impresses me though is the sheer scale of the games

Have you looked at possession? About 30 or 40 zombies on screen at once

The game i want is GTA 4 supposed to be a PS3 launch title

If we wanted to keep replaying the same games over and over again while new games came out on other systems, yes, I guess we would.
I wasn't saying no-one should CARE about the graphics, just that it's not the PRIMARY consideration for me, yknow?
Sure, it comes into play...but only so much as though I'll look at a game, and be all like "shiit....lookit that!", and appreciate it, rather than trying to see its flaws.
It's ALL going to look great from this point onwards...

not true. Gameplay from PS2 is way better then PS1.

I think the point was that if graphics didn't matter, the gameplay would have been elevated on playstation to make it (probably) just as good. If graphics don't matter, gameplay could easily be improved upon on the same system.

my friend works for sony and game tests

except hes testing on PSP and i dont care.

well, in the end PlayStation will win win once again.