![]() |
Canibble exploitation movies:which is the best
Iv'e been keeping my eyes on these three movies.
Canibble Apocalypse Cannible Ferox Cannible Holocaust Are any of them good? If so, which is the goriest. (I'm such a gore hound:D ) |
Ive seen Cannibal Holocaust before it's a low budget thats slightly entertaining although it has it good moments.
|
Cannibal Ferox all the way:D
|
ya is that good? BLOODY???
|
i love the typo .. so appropriate
ca-nibble |
From what i have seen, it should be ca-gorge. How do they not get fat eating entire people?
|
Quote:
|
maybe screaming makes the meat leaner.
|
Its a long time since a watched Cannible Ferox (on bad vhs in early 80) but we couldnt take it serious even then...if a remember wright it contains a boat motor(dont know the english word) crushing a face..this is very bad made...cause youn can see its a doll from a hundred meter.....
:p |
lol. nothing wrong with low bugdetness.
|
Quote:
Uhhhh...Tape worms? |
That outboard-motor bit was Zombie Holocaust, slasherman.
All three of these cannibal movies are top drawer exploitation, Mothman (there are not enough girls in this forum). Holocaust is the most serious and effective effort, Ferox is more wreckless and trashy but with some outrageously savage gore (that nob-slicing scene outdoes the one in Deodato's movie - ouch!) and Apocalypse (set mostly in the city rather than the jungle) chugs along nicely with some tasty Gianetto De Rossi makeup effects (he did the gore for likes of Zombie Flesh Eaters, The Beyond, The Living Dead at Manchester Morgue and the recent Switchblade Romance/Haute Tension). Note that these must all be seen uncut however, and bear in mind the first two here both feature almost unwatchable real animal killings. |
ive only ever seen cannibal holocaust but i thought it was great because in watching this movie i had a physical reaction to a one part in it and for that its good in my books:) . but the killing of real animals was a little sick but reasonable in the contex of this movie.
|
Hmmm - presumably you would draw the line at really killing humans to depict murder in films though?
This distinction between the worth of each species in the name of making art is rather worrying, and thankfully no-one could legally get away with animal slaughter as filmed entertainment today. Paradoxically, or rather hypocritically on my part, it is the inclusion of these difficult scenes that give spaghetti cannibal movies their edge (and why we talk about them with such intrigue) - and asks the question of what really stirs us inside sometimes. |
Quote:
i think there is more than enough bad taste in these films for people to talk about them - without killing animals .. most of us are aware people arent really getting killed. of course the discussions will continue and 90% of the people all say the same damn thing: 'i wish they didnt kill the animals' not very stimulating - or intriguing and to clarify .. bad taste on its own isnt for me neccessary a bad thing ... it can be fun.. oh, and I wouldnt watch movies where people were really getting killed - and i can deal with animals getting killed if i know its fake. and i know star wars wasnt really shot in space. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'd rather have them kill real people. poor defencless animals.:( :( what kind of animals btw? better not be any cute ones. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
a turtle WTF!!!?? thats almost funny. they are cute and all, but that just doesnt fit too well.
|
Quote:
|
not one of these either
|
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......
chocolate. http://www.thegoonies.com/images/sloth.jpg LOL! SLOTH! |
Quote:
|
There was also a snake killed, and a spider-monkey.
How they shot the baby hog at point blank while it was tied down was fucking deplorable. |
Quote:
|
OH NO!!!! not a spider monkey!! NO!! they are so cute!!! DAMMIT!!:mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
|
Star Wars was actually shot in space urgeok, but it was a long, long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.
If you begin removing the harsher elements from extremely harsh films, they begin to lose their edge - as someone pointed out above, the undeniably genuine animal killings in Cannibal Holocaust serve to make the casual viewer ponder on the human "deaths" and, together with the real third-world execution footage (deliberately misleadingly described as "fake" in the movie itself), the whole package comes with a punch that makes this film powerful, demanding and unforgettable... whatever your views on its importance in cinematic history, and animal rights. Does it really matter about how traditionally cute your slaughtered animals are, mothman/aborted? Is the killing of the (edible?) pig worse than the slicing open of the live, screaming muskrat, or the stabbing and shell-peeling of the giant turtle? |
Quote:
The best 3 are: "Cannibal Holocaust" "Jungle Holocaust" "Cannobal Apocalypse" "Ferox" is okay (mostly down to the location shooting, the score and John Morghen's balls-out performance) but is far to slow in bringing in the cannibals, is too padded with New York footage and has some poor FX (like the awful dick chopping scene), that are filmed full on in bright light to show just how much they look like latex. Something Deodato was wise enough not to do and as such the deaths in "Can Holo" are much more disturbing. And when it comes to full on, close up gore he betters Lenzi as well, as the butchery sequence in "Jungle Holocaust" is up close but looks 100 times better than anything in "Ferox". So good in fact Lenzi stole it for his "Eaten Alive". |
Quote:
Mike's dick-slicing gets far more of a reaction in my house than the equivalent in Holocaust and any of the others - if you really want to get anal (with a severed cock? Snigger!) about it, I would put this down to [a] the tight editing of the sequence [b] that sublime "slapping-back" latex attachment and [c] the lack of daft bloodied-stump as in on show in Holocaust (not to mention the rather inappropriate looking stone-knife the cannibal uses in Deodato's film, and oddly greyish skin tone of the unfortunate member). Why do I find myself talking about penises so much in this forum? |
Quote:
|
Cannibal Movies
I watched Cannibal Holocaust for the first time just a couple of days ago. I expected it to be a load of crap but Iwas surprised at the quality of the direction,acting and production.Bearing in mind it is now about 25 years old and the version I saw was the recently re-released version that has been re-censored and cut.
However it still remains a very powerful movie with plenty of gore and gruesome scenes.It is also a film with a message and not just a pure exploitation flick.It asks the viewer to think about the way the "civilised" folk behave when they enter the jungle and the way the natives react to them. |
DR. BUTCHER M.D. ...
Cannibal movie with zombies too! Can't go wrong. |
Quote:
|
Whoops! Shows what I know!
|
Quote:
Bruno Mattei, I salute you - even if no-one else does. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i have a movie somewhere that i havent seen in years that had noticible inserts of wildlife footage .. I know it was italian .. and a living dead film. maybe this happened more than once ? |
Quote:
|
aka Night of the Zombies / Zombie Inferno / Cannibal Virus...
It's probably the same movie, but I'm fairly sure there are other Italian exploiters also utilising 3rd-world stock footage and the like in attempts to make their films appear authentic. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:00 PM. |