Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Classic Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Last Seen 70s/80s Movie (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31568)

Angra 02-04-2012 03:59 PM

Have u ever seen the original?

It sure left you with unanswered questions as well.


I wanna see the remake. Right now.

hammerfan 02-04-2012 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angra (Post 919010)
Have u ever seen the original?

It sure left you with unanswered questions as well.


I wanna see the remake. Right now.

No, I haven't seen the original.

Elvis_Christ 02-04-2012 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sgt.Kazoo (Post 918953)
So, I'm a total extreme film junkie, and I've heard a lot of hype about A Serbian Film. I watched it last night, and maybe I don't have a soul, or I'm a bit too seasoned in extreme cinema, but I didn't find it disturbing at all.
Anyone else seen it? Care to share your thoughts?

There's some discussion on A Serbian Film in this thread if you're interested in reading what people on here thought.

wizard of gore 02-04-2012 08:27 PM

the unborn

fortunato 02-04-2012 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hammerfan (Post 919008)
Loved The Woman in Black. It brought me back to the old Hammer films with Cushing and Lee. Lots of atmosphere, creepiness, and a couple of jumpy moments. At first it was difficult to look at Radcliffe and not see Harry Potter but that didn't last too long. I think he did a pretty good job of portraying Arthur Kipps. The only thing I didn't like was that you were left with a few questions. I won't bring them up here until more people have seen it.

Awesome, that's what I wanted to hear. Can't wait to check it out.

newb 02-04-2012 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fortunato (Post 919026)
Awesome, that's what I wanted to hear. Can't wait to check it out.

yeah...getting some good reviews

horrorzack 02-04-2012 10:30 PM

Just came back from The Woman In Black. Very good movie. I must have jumped like 50 times while watching it.

Fearonsarms 02-05-2012 02:05 AM

The Night Evelyn Came Out Of The Grave (1971)-Morbid giallo with more horror elements than most gialli-very atmospheric, complex plot with adorable set pieces. If you liked the same year's A Bay Of Blood by Mario Bava you will love this as this also shows the greed that turns people into murderers.

The Tunnel (2011)-Australian horror that like Grave Encounters was a lot better than I expected and not simply a Paranormal Activity rip off. Very well done and recommended.

leezuki 02-05-2012 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angra (Post 918996)
But you must admit the lead actor was awsome. ;)

he was good, the directing was good as well.

ZombieDrone 02-05-2012 07:24 AM

Ran by Akira Kurosawa.

Basically it's a Japanese take on King Lear. Superb.

The Ugly Duchess 02-05-2012 08:14 AM

Piranha 2
Piranha 3
Rogue
The Giant Claw

Those were my recent viewings.

The Duchess


http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/7...asmarthain.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

fortunato 02-05-2012 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZombieDrone (Post 919065)
Ran by Akira Kurosawa.

Basically it's a Japanese take on King Lear. Superb.

Amazing film. Probably my favorite Kurosawa.

roshiq 02-05-2012 09:56 AM


>> Rosewood Lane (2011) : B

This 'Psycho-paperboy' story has it flaws, plot holes and a weird ending that left couple of questions unanswered but still it's a pretty decent & entertaining film overall from the director of Jeepers Creepers. Liked it.

>> Henry's Crime (2011) : C

>> BBC's other Christmas Ghost Stories: The Treasure Of Abbot Thomas (1974) : B

>> The Lincoln Lawyer (2011) : B+

The Villain 02-05-2012 10:39 AM

The Woman In Black
http://i1101.photobucket.com/albums/..._V1_SY317_.jpg

So having seen the original, i spent most of the time watching this silently comparing the two. Some things are the same and some are different. There was a good balance that all remakes should follow. Some differences i found though that i didnt like was the original had moments of true fear while the remake was mostly jump scares. But for it's part the jump scares were done excellently and werent done for a cheap effect. I myself jumped a few times. Another thing i liked about the original that they left out was how Kipps became terrified of the sound of horses. Also the actor in the original didnt just seem scared, he was sick with terror while Radcliffe just looked frightened. They also took it a very modern route with trying to find a solution instead of just being stuck within the horror of it all and trying to escape. I did like the story they included here about the children being in danger whenever the woman is seen though. However I felt that the ending was a little bit of a cop out while i was more pleased with the original's ending. So i guess what i'm saying is, the original is better.

But this is still a great genuinely scary movie that actually provides a tense spooky atmosphere that horror movies never seem to have anymore. I definitely recommend seeing this whether you've seen the original or not.


In Time
http://i1101.photobucket.com/albums/...0214317_-1.jpg

A fun quick paced action. I really liked the time aspect of the movie as it gave it an interesting twist that set it apart. I wasn't sure if Timberlake would be good as an action star and while he doesnt come across as a brute muscular guy taking everyone out, he works in his own way.

crazy raplh 02-05-2012 11:14 AM

Quarintine 2

_____V_____ 02-05-2012 10:33 PM

http://blackmannrobin.com/wp-content...hronicle_p.jpg

Impressive. The film really picks up the pace after the first 20-odd minutes and the direction is to be commended for this. A solid script and some very good characterisations coupled with neat effects makes this quite an entertainer.

If you are sick of teenage angst and super powers, this film is not for you. Otherwise recommended to anyone who is looking for a change from the normal blockbuster/found footage stuff being churned out at the moment.

* * * ½

wizard of gore 02-06-2012 03:05 AM

insidious,wasnt too bad

swiss tony 02-06-2012 09:27 AM

Fright Night - 3/10

I watched this a couple of nights ago with low expectations as remakes, particularly ones that rehash a sentimentally cherished movie from your youth, almost always break what doesn't need fixed, and I wasn't disappointed. The characters don't develop, thus the palpable antipathy between Jerry and Brewster never builds (like it did in the original), nor the ensuing tension and I ultimately felt no attachment to the goodies. There was nothing new here, just a bad contemporaneous retelling - SHITE!

leezuki 02-06-2012 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Villain (Post 919088)
The Woman In Black

http://i1101.photobucket.com/albums/...V1_ SY317_.jpg

So having seen the original, i spent most of the time watching this silently comparing the two. Some things are the same and some are different. There was a good balance that all remakes should follow. Some differences i found though that i didnt like was the original had moments of true fear while the remake was mostly jump scares. But for it's part the jump scares were done excellently and werent done for a cheap effect. I myself jumped a few times. Another thing i liked about the original that they left out was how Kipps became terrified of the sound of horses. Also the actor in the original didnt just seem scared, he was sick with terror while Radcliffe just looked frightened. They also took it a very modern route with trying to find a solution instead of just being stuck within the horror of it all and trying to escape. I did like the story they included here about the children being in danger whenever the woman is seen though. However I felt that the ending was a little bit of a cop out while i was more pleased with the original's ending. So i guess what i'm saying is, the original is better.

But this is still a great genuinely scary movie that actually provides a tense spooky atmosphere that horror movies never seem to have anymore. I definitely recommend seeing this whether you've seen the original or not.

But this is still a great genuinely scary movie that actually provides a tense spooky atmosphere that horror movies never seem to have anymore. I definitely recommend seeing this whether you've seen the original or not.

In Time

http://i1101.photobucket.com/albums/...0214317_-1.jpg

A fun quick paced action. I really liked the time aspect of the movie as it gave it an interesting twist that set it apart. I wasn't sure if Timberlake would be good as an action star and while he doesnt come across as a brute muscular guy taking everyone out, he works in his own way.

looking forward to woman in black, in time was such a good movie.
just watched arrietty studio ghibli, such a beautiful movie for all the family. 10/10

Elvis_Christ 02-06-2012 12:14 PM

50/50

This one exceeded my expectations and I thought it mixed it's elements of comedy & drama tastefully to tell a moving story.

The Smurfs

Quite well done I thought and quite fun. Captured the essence of the show quite well.

A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas

The weakest of the three films but still enjoyable.

The Big Year

Really good. I usually watch more crude low brow comedies so this was a bit of a gamble for me but it paid off. Probably the best chemistry between a cast I've seen in a long time.

The Villain 02-06-2012 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leezuki (Post 919138)
looking forward to woman in black, in time was such a good movie.
just watched arrietty studio ghibli, such a beautiful movie for all the family. 10/10

Yeah i was actually surprised by how much i enjoyed In Time

ferretchucker 02-06-2012 03:58 PM

Marathon of NOES continues with The Dream Child. Quite liked the way they tried out new things with the dreamscape - it was...fresh and had a visual charm. And I appreciate that they were trying out a new idea rather than rehashing the same plot just to get some cheap kills...just a shame they didn't quite pull it off. Overall, it's an unnecessary, fairly poor film, but at least it tried hard.

http://365horror.co.uk/wp-content/up...m-street-5.jpg

Just a side note - I always LOVE the NOES posters!

phantomstranger 02-06-2012 04:49 PM

"Apollo 18" (2011)

Plot: IMDB
Decades-old found footage from NASA's abandoned Apollo 18 mission, where two American astronauts were sent on a secret expedition, reveals the reason the U.S. has never returned to the moon.

Phantom's Review: Bad, really bad. The kind of bad that when the film is over you get up and open the doors to let the stink out. Skip it at all costs.

--

Posher778 02-06-2012 06:17 PM

The Woman in Black (2012) A solid 8/10

Lots and lots of complaining going on about plot holes and bad acting, and almost 100% of it is just people who didn't understand it, which is fine by me. It's a solid movie that uses atmosphere, and isn't too heavy on cheap scares (notice I said 'not TOO heavy')

Oh, and the scenery is incredible.

roshiq 02-07-2012 03:01 AM

Absentia (2011)

http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/...c/Absentia.jpg

A pretty slow burn but a very decent & interesting low budget-indie horror about the people who gets missing without a trace...! Though it heavily relied on characters along with the emotional contents of love, loss & then start over but I really liked way how they blend an emotionally moving theme (like losing the loved one & finally deciding to declare 'dead in absentia') with a creepy horror element. The small & amateur cast did a good job with the story.

Recommended.

>>: B+

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elvis_Christ (Post 919141)
50/50

This one exceeded my expectations and I thought it mixed it's elements of comedy & drama tastefully to tell a moving story.

A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas

The weakest of the three films but still enjoyable.

Ditto.:)

swiss tony 02-07-2012 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elvis_Christ (Post 919141)
50/50

This one exceeded my expectations and I thought it mixed it's elements of comedy & drama tastefully to tell a moving story.

.

Perfect summation, couldn't have said it better. I watched this last night and was drawn in by the story and LOL at the funny bits (everything Seth Rogan said, virtually).

Really worth watching!

Sistinas666 02-07-2012 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elvis_Christ (Post 919141)
50/50A Very Harold & Kumar Christmas

The weakest of the three films but still enjoyable.

The Big Year

Really good. I usually watch more crude low brow comedies so this was a bit of a gamble for me but it paid off. Probably the best chemistry between a cast I've seen in a long time.


You hit the nail on the head with Harold and Kumar, imo. I just finished it and did enjoy it. It'll probably be a Christmas movie staple during the holidays from now on.

I was disappointed with The Big Year. I felt it was a complete waste of comedic talent.

Elvis_Christ 02-07-2012 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sistinas666 (Post 919226)
I was disappointed with The Big Year. I felt it was a complete waste of comedic talent.

No way. The film was subtle and I dug how the cast didn't rely on their usual typecasting to pull off a great film. It was all class IMO.

More Than Horror 02-07-2012 05:18 PM

Last horror I saw was "Woman in Black" (think that's the name?) Anyway, hearing mixed reviews. Personally, I loved it. I would rate 8 out of 10.

fortunato 02-07-2012 09:03 PM

The Woman in Black (2012)

Gotta say I was kind of disappointed with this. It had a few innovative scare scenes and some really nice creep-out moments, a fantastic setting, and some decent camerawork. But overall it felt mostly clichéd; a slight story, not-that-great performances, and plenty of worn-out genre set-pieces. Overall, it was a fun one-time watch, but for me it's not much more than that.

roshiq 02-08-2012 02:14 AM

Some Guy Who Kills People (2011)

http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/...dhdc/SGWKP.jpg

Ken Boyd, a recently released mental patient who suffers from depression and post-traumatic stress disorder from severely traumatic bullying in high school. As a new romance, an unsympathetic mother, and a surprise appearance by his 11-year-old daughter all combine to ratchet his stress levels higher, Ken’s bullies are systematically and brutally murdered. Some Guy Who Kills People unfolds in grisly yet humorous fashion, but also with an undeniable sweetness.

A beautiful dark comedy. Besides involvement of John Landis as executive producer, the film also comes with a good cast. Particularly Karen Black & Barry Bostwick (as Sheriff) were great treat to watch but that little girl...Amy, played the daughter of Ken, did an excellent job also. Recommended.

>>: B+

Stand by Me (1986)

http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/.../StandbyMe.jpg

>>: A-

Sistinas666 02-08-2012 03:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elvis_Christ (Post 919233)
No way. The film was subtle and I dug how the cast didn't rely on their usual typecasting to pull off a great film. It was all class IMO.


I can very much respect your point. I went in to it expecting the regular Black/Martin/Wilson type comedy and it just wasn't it. I do, however think it was an excellent attempt at them breaking away from their normal comedic performances.

_____V_____ 02-08-2012 06:08 AM

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg

The scares were good and nicely spread throughout, the story/script was solid (considering it was adapted from a bestseller) and the cinematography was profoundly detailed. Yet, there was something missing - a spark which failed to ignite till the end. Maybe it was because I was seeing too much of Harry Potter in Radcliffe, or maybe Radcliffe was overdoing the scary stuff (bump - wide-eyed - sneaking around slowly - checking source of bump - repeat), or maybe the jumpy scares bit, having been overdone in too many recent films, have lost their effect somewhat.

Or maybe I have become a bit jaded.

I might rewatch it in the future to appreciate it a bit more. For now, I was entertained but certainly not impressed.


* * *

newb 02-08-2012 08:53 AM

Fright Night [2011]

did not capture the charm of the original but not a bad movie.

Angra 02-08-2012 12:29 PM

"Footlose" (2011) 8/10

It was good. In many ways it kept very true to the original but still managed to add some new elements that i appreciated. The "death" theme especially, which made it darker in between all the lighthearted parts that we know from the original.

And another thing. They couldn't have found a more fitting actor to play Chris Penn's Willard than Miles Teller. :)





"Bad Teacher" 3-4/10

Not very funny and they couldn't have made the ending more wrong. Diaz should've ended up getting AIDS.

Elvis_Christ 02-08-2012 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sistinas666 (Post 919249)
I can very much respect your point. I went in to it expecting the regular Black/Martin/Wilson type comedy and it just wasn't it. I do, however think it was an excellent attempt at them breaking away from their normal comedic performances.

Yeah I can see why you'd be a bit disappointed. The studio seemed to really fuck up the marketing with this one. They seemed to have duped a lot of people into seeing it on false pretences. More of a feel good drama with subtle comedic elements than a all out OTT laughfest like people were expecting.

---------------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angra (Post 919287)
Diaz should've ended up getting AIDS.

:D

LOL


--------------

Insidious

Not bad at all... well aside from the ridiculous looking Darth Maul demon. What the fuck were they thinking with that one? Killed it for me to be honest. Nice take on the Poltergeist formula. Studios would be better off "borrowing" story-lines like this than making straight up remakes. But yeah that fucking demon :rolleyes:

roshiq 02-09-2012 12:36 AM

The Son of No One (2011)

http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/...idhdc/son1.jpg

I don't understand how the hell they managed such a cast for this awfully dull & lame cop-drama?!?

>>: D


The Wicker Tree
(2011)

http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/...ickerTree1.jpg

The premise was almost similar to its successor & there were one or two moments that have even comes & goes like with a classic 70's vibe. But for almost first 60 minutes it was like a non-suspenseful Britt drama that has been advertised or promoted as a horror/thriller. Sir Christopher Lee's very brief cameo even failed to deliver a nostalgic tone in this disappointing, Cash in effort. The cast was decent but the story, major characters, the comedic elements and the way everything unfolds were quite lackluster in compare to the 1973 cult classic. Instead setting the story about a young American couple from Texas travels to Scotland & finally to the island to spread the word of Christ; now it seems it'd even better to tell a (prequel) story of that missing girl of the original about what happened to her in a gripping & suspenseful fashion...though that would even be an unnecessary thing & would straightway consider another cash in effort but at least could be bit more watchable (like the way they done The Thing prequel) than this. Anyway, on the final note I'd suggest, the ardent fans of the original can skip this without a hesitation.

>>: C-

Sand Sharks (2011)

http://i1097.photobucket.com/albums/...sandsharks.jpg

I knew what this was going to be...ridiculously stupid & funny and it neither exceeds nor disappoints my expectations. Forget about the 'Sharks' with poorly done CGI, at least some gOOd lOOking chicks in the small cast were watchable.

>>: C

Posher778 02-09-2012 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elvis_Christ (Post 919293)
Insidious

Not bad at all... well aside from the ridiculous looking Darth Maul demon. What the fuck were they thinking with that one? Killed it for me to be honest. Nice take on the Poltergeist formula. Studios would be better off "borrowing" story-lines like this than making straight up remakes. But yeah that fucking demon :rolleyes:


Yeah I can see why you'd be a bit disappointed. The studio seemed to really fuck up the marketing with this one. They seemed to have duped a lot of people into seeing it on false pretences. More of a feel good drama with subtle comedic elements than a all out OTT laughfest like people were expecting.

---------------



:D

LOL


--------------

That demon was awesome. At least someone was bold enough to personify a nightmare-esque demon than just make someone's possessed eyes roll back and talk funny.

leezuki 02-09-2012 05:28 AM

fragile, avarage movie but ok. 4/10

_____V_____ 02-09-2012 09:42 AM

Couple of anthologies to keep the horror mood going.

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 AM.