first one was ok 2 one really freakkin sucked and that guy should have his nads cut off if he did that

I love the first one...the second one is alright, but the first one is definitely better, I think.

It wasnt a demon. Watch the sp. features on #2









Btw, I loved them both.

whatever the fuckin thing had wings and ate people in my book thats a demon

The first movie was great, becuz the director did a good job not to show the watchers the killer was a demon. In the beginning you think it's a man, but then it turns out to be a freakin demonnn. That was nice.

This movie is interesting so many people hate it, yet so many peopl like it! I would give 6.5/10... it was alright haven't seen the sequel yet, fuck that director should never be a movie director again.

I love both of the movies, I find them quite original.

The Creeper is alot kooler with his hat/coat/axe, but He is one of my all time favorite movie monsters either way. I enjoyed the 2nd movie much more than #1, but bother were amazing....If only Victor Salva was a sick bastard....Id compliment him on being a great director, but shit.....can you say "Molester"?

I thought the first movie was okay but nothing special. I absolutely loathed the second movie. This (the 2nd) was the hardest movie I've ever sat through in a movie theater.




And I saw Spawn at the movies!!! :)

the first movie kicked ass - not to often you get to see a bad guy get away scott free with the good element standing around with thier thumbs up theier butt and that priceless "what the fuck" just happened look on thier faces - priceless - plus the creeper in this moive is totally badass

now the second

good god why o why did i rent this...

could have been great, but they gave the creeper way to much personalty taking away from it's more primative aspects of brutality - just wasn't scary, found myself laughing through most of it

all i've got to say is....*Jeepers, Creepers, Where'd you get those peepers? Jeepers, Creepers, where'd you get those eyes?!?*