Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Latest Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=35)
-   -   Last Seen Contemporary Movie (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=63920)

Amalthea_unicorn 06-05-2016 06:56 AM

Super 8

The Devil Inside

horcrux2007 06-05-2016 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sculpt (Post 1014165)
No.

Thanks for the thorough argument.

Amalthea_unicorn 06-05-2016 01:10 PM

http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/...20140615160603

The Flight Before Christmas 2008

horcrux2007 06-05-2016 03:23 PM

X-Men: Apocalypse (2016)

This seems to be the year of superheroes vs superheroes with DC and Marvel releasing their tentpoles, Batman v Superman and Civil War, and now Fox has released one for the X-Men with the lackluster X-Men: Apocalypse. In Apocalypse, the world's first and most powerful mutant, aptly named Apocalypse, has woken up from a slumber after thousands of years to find that society is not revering him as a god as they used to. Apocalypse throws a tantrum and assembles a team of four mutants to destroy modern civilization and create a new world order. As the fate of the world hangs in the balance, Mystique and Professor X assemble a new team of young mutants to save mankind. It seemed like having God and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse be the villains would make the movie at least somewhat interesting, but, really they don't do anything for a majority of the 144 minute running time. For most of Apocalypse's story, he's just assembling his team while the Horsemen he's already recruited just sit around while he convinces another mutant to join the group. That's not only an issue with the Horsemen, unfortunately. Almost all of the other mutants, Mystique, Professor X, Nightcrawler, Jean Grey, etc, wait around until something bad happens. There's a ton of interesting characters in this film that aren't given anything interesting to do. Almost all of the mutants spend the entire movie feeling sorry for themselves, and there's really no good action until the very end. Even the final fight scene gets underwhelming at certain points. At times, I felt like I was watching a bad Roland Emmerich disaster flick. One positive is that Evan Peters steals every scene as Quicksilver, giving a great personality to the character. He was the one thing I wholeheartedly enjoyed about the movie. X-Men: Apocalypse has a couple moments of visual flair, some decent action and clear ambition, but its muddled plot and bland characterizations make it a disappointing misstep.

5/10

Giganticface 06-05-2016 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horcrux2007 (Post 1014136)
Alice Through the Looking Glass (2016)

I might have been the only one in the world that wanted a sequel to 2010's criminally underrated Alice in Wonderland, but whether you wanted it or not, here's the sequel. Alice Through the Looking Glass takes place a few years after the first movie after Alice has finished her voyage around the world. When she returns, an old friend from Underland leads Alice through a mirror which leads her back to Underland. She learns that her best friend, the Mad Hatter, has lost his "muchness." The Hatter found the first hat he ever made where his family was killed by the Jabberwocky, and he thinks that his family is still alive, but no one believes him, including Alice. The White Queen devises a plan for Alice to steal a device called the Chronosphere which will allow her to travel back in time and save the Hatter's family. All the characters come back from the first movie, although a lot of them are in smaller roles, but the real standout is newcomer Sacha Baron Cohen as Time. He and Helena Bonham Carter as the Red Queen were surprisingly funny throughout the film and made for some memorable villains. Mia Wasikowska also had a reliably good performance as Alice. Through the Looking Glass doesn't have the thorough world-building that Alice in Wonderland had, but the plot is easier to follow in this one. Along with some breathtaking visuals, Alice Through the Looking Glass should please fans of first film with a fun and exciting return to Underland.

8/10

Can't say I'm terribly interested because the first one didn't do much for me, but good review nonetheless. Always appreciated.

The Bloofer Lady 06-05-2016 06:10 PM

THE TUNNEL 2011

Found footage...journalists investigating possible government cover-up in underground tunnels, they run into ...something.

Was a bit skeptical as to why there was a cover up and not a resolution. Not really impressed.

Sculpt 06-05-2016 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horcrux2007 (Post 1014199)
X-Men: Apocalypse (2016)

This seems to be the year of superheroes vs superheroes with DC and Marvel releasing their tentpoles, Batman v Superman and Civil War, and now Fox has released one for the X-Men with the lackluster X-Men: Apocalypse. In Apocalypse, the world's first and most powerful mutant, aptly named Apocalypse, has woken up from a slumber after thousands of years to find that society is not revering him as a god as they used to. Apocalypse throws a tantrum and assembles a team of four mutants to destroy modern civilization and create a new world order. As the fate of the world hangs in the balance, Mystique and Professor X assemble a new team of young mutants to save mankind. It seemed like having God and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse be the villains would make the movie at least somewhat interesting, but, really they don't do anything for a majority of the 144 minute running time. For most of Apocalypse's story, he's just assembling his team while the Horsemen he's already recruited just sit around while he convinces another mutant to join the group. That's not only an issue with the Horsemen, unfortunately. Almost all of the other mutants, Mystique, Professor X, Nightcrawler, Jean Grey, etc, wait around until something bad happens. There's a ton of interesting characters in this film that aren't given anything interesting to do. Almost all of the mutants spend the entire movie feeling sorry for themselves, and there's really no good action until the very end. Even the final fight scene gets underwhelming at certain points. At times, I felt like I was watching a bad Roland Emmerich disaster flick. One positive is that Evan Peters steals every scene as Quicksilver, giving a great personality to the character. He was the one thing I wholeheartedly enjoyed about the movie. X-Men: Apocalypse has a couple moments of visual flair, some decent action and clear ambition, but its muddled plot and bland characterizations make it a disappointing misstep.

5/10

Ouch! Just looking at the score there. I think you liked Future Past pretty well, right? I can't remember.

I can't read your review yet, because I'm gonna see the film for sure. I like to know as little as humanly possible.

cheebacheeba 06-05-2016 10:30 PM

The brothers Grimsby.
So. Much. Stupid.
Didn't really need the grossout scenes, but it is what it is.
Despite this, undeniably funny.
Pretty decent action oriented comedy.

DeadbeatAtDawn 06-06-2016 05:08 AM

Gore, Quebec, 2014


https://horrorpediadotcom.files.word...2014.jpg?w=700



Midori, 1992


https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...D5C94TKhPFQfpV

horcrux2007 06-06-2016 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sculpt (Post 1014216)
Ouch! Just looking at the score there. I think you liked Future Past pretty well, right? I can't remember.

I can't read your review yet, because I'm gonna see the film for sure. I like to know as little as humanly possible.

I haven't actually seenot DOFP, but they told me what I needed to know to get through the movie. It still wasn't very good, but you should definitely see it on your own to see how you like it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:39 PM.