How can there be so many replies on this thread?:confused:

It´s just plain stupid!!???

WHAT?! That creature? That idiot who just posted whole Threads of utter garbage?

THIS dickhead is a very decent member?

Well at least those moronic posts he just made show why he thought "CH" was REAL!...
Because he's a fucking idiot.

And so yes....I do have a go at idiots posting garbage and people that then try to justify the idiot and his idiocy!

It's YOU and this forum that has turned into a 'twat'.
And it's because of people who look down their noses at certain films. People who decree that just because THEY can't see past the blood and guts then no one else can.
And because of supposedly drunk morons asking insulting and absurd questions and people defending them!

Look in the mirror!

the irony here is that i took a look at your web page and found 2 things ..

- you and i have a lot in common .. we like a ton of the same things .. the biggest difference is that you you are arrogant and ill tempered and have a lot of maturing to do.

- there seems to be a pattern here .. you dedicated a lot of time and energy to shooting off on a large number of forums where you have had problems with a lot of people ... everywhere you go.

Maybe you'd better have a look in your mirror as well ..
Personally I'm not so fond of my reflection.


It is a pity though ... we'd have a hell of a lot to talk about if you weren't such an ill mannered arrogant self centered self righteous prick.

No...i just seem to be one of the only people on here who it seems is not being blackmailed into defending an idiot and all the shit he spews out now matter what!

And i am on many sites, and many are fine...but there is always some that seem to house morons who only communicate on the internet because in real life no one could stand to be near them for more than 5 seconds.

And no, given your ARROGANT comments towards certain films and those that do appreciate them...we have fuck all in common. Thank Christ.

well so much for that them ...


so why the fuck are you still here ?

Methinks because he likes to get people riled up.

There are critics and there are critics, though - read, say, Empire magazine (UK) and you get a film student mentality raving its glib opinions about the latest flavour-of-the-month actor or high concept movie. This is probably where you're most likely to find disagreements about films like Vampires (which I think is quite underrated for the record).

Read a less fanboy-based publication on the other hand and you can find well constructed, less frenzied reviews full of ideas for the movie in question and less likely to rub you up the wrong way because of a more informed approach to the subject matter - i.e. from those who look at each film on its own merits rather than young bandwagon-jumpers making snidey comparisons left right and centre.

Of course, you can get too highbrow - listen to these old farts dismissing the spaghetti-horrors out of hand and you realise many of the more established critics sadly can't see past Citizen Kane.

I wish I noticed all this shit before this jackass got banned. What a tool!

Hey douchebag! The film kills live animals and has footage of real executions. It's not absurd to wonder if other parts of it went too far too. They were filming in the middle of the jungle with a bunch of savages in the mid 70s. How hard would it be to cut off one of their dicks and get away with it?

They weren't "actors", they were jungle people. And if you can tell me the name of the "actor" that got his dick cut off and 1 other movie he's been in, I'll send you a fuckin' check in the mail right now because you're full of shit.

In fact, I've got money that says you probably haven't even seen this film and are just preaching from you high horse because a film with 'such major distribution' :rolleyes: couldn't possibly kill a savage in the middle of the jungle. Well, why not? They killed plenty of animals and that isn't exactly a socially acceptable thing to put to film, but they did it anyways. That's why it's called an exploitation film. People got exploited.

If you had actually seen this, you wouldnt be ranting like this because you'd probably be wondering the same things that shanks and I were.

Like urge said, Faces of Death is more mainstream than this and that is loaded with footage of people getting killed.

Jackass. :rolleyes:




That's what I woulda said to him if he wasn't banned already.

That made me giggle.....:)

I watched CH again last night...compliments of Netflix. And it is a pretty hard movie to watch. I could see where you might question wether or not some of the scenes where real (penis chop / rapes / flesh eating. Because of the authenticity of the war crime shots and the animal killings this can seriously make your mind wander. I personally dont think any of the footage with the "final five" is true but I guess you never know.