lmao that was funny about the karaoke thing.....but i see where your comin from

The reason The Crow should have been more violent is the story almost requires it.

If you take the first one for example:

What was done to Eric Draven & Shelley Webster was phsically mentally horrific. Her rape and torture, added to Eric stumbling in on the act, forced to watch and then dies.

So as a reanimated soul, to forever haunt this planet until he enacts his revenge, so did it seem enough? In the comic more happened, but for the movie it was tuned down.

I know it might seem quite sick to ask for more gore, but if the need is there it should be put there.

I know that for some people that is not what they want to see, but GET SOMETHING ELSE OUT. I dont say gore for gores sake, but if something offends me I have an off switch.

I like the film The Crow and it will always remain as one of my favourite films, but I just think if they had put the neccessary violence in it could have been improved.

Oh and by the way Brandon Lee would not have been in the follow ups as the only constant through out the stories is the crow (who is called Manny).

damn well said man!

that may have been the way of the comics - but i'm pretty sure had he lived - he'd have been asked to do the sequels.

of course brandon would've been in the sequels, otherwise you'd just regurgitate the plot over and over with increasingly lesser and lesser (and cheaper) actors....







...oh wait

yeah .. no shit !

I think the Crow is proving to be a cult classic. I have no interest whatsoever in the sequels however.

Awesome film.

Cult Classic? I think we have proven that it is a Classic Classic for the fact that EVERYONE I talk to loves this film.

:cool:

yea i have to agree its ALREADY a cult classic....has been for a while