Werewolves also have primal, animal hunting instinct. And nature always takes its course. 100% of the time.

Well, Doc illustrated a disparity in the kinds of objects the two creatures were vulnerable too. You mention the fact that a werewolf was unlikely to be carrying such objects specifically and/or was unlikely to realize their significance after a transformation.

I felt it quite pertinent to mention that it was equally unlikely that a Vampire would be carrying the relevant object.

The fact that it may or may not be useful is a question of whichever lore one gives credence too. In some lore the werewolf would be perfectly capable of using some of those things, though that is about as equal as the amount of lore with those vulnerabilities a little more then an irritation to a vampire.

So thank you V, I did read the post, and I still thinks it's equally relevant that neither are likely to be carrying the object incidentally. Not least of which, silver would not be obtained incidentally in amounts that would be useful as a weapon. The vampire would certainly have to go out of their way to procure them.

See, thats why I said you didnt read the initial posts. I am glad you went back and did exactly that. :)

*Pulls out a trumpet and blasts the main riff of the Jurassic Park theme*

I always think of The Fly when I see him.

I always think 'gross' when I see him.

:D .................

Werewolves vs. Vampires
 

Which do you prefer?

Myself, I find werewolves more interesting. They don't have the religious overtones of vampires, and are psychologically more intriguing. A werewolf represents the base nature of humanity, man's nature unleashed in its most primitive form; unchecked by, even counter to, the framework of civilization.

Plus, they don't have to wear ruffled shirts or listen to techno-music.

***bump***