Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Classic Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Last Seen 70s/80s Movie (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31568)

Dante'sInferno 10-24-2005 06:06 AM

Final Destination

zwoti 10-24-2005 02:31 PM

woyzeck

Marroe 10-24-2005 06:45 PM

Saw Doom last night. It didn't really deal too much with the story, but it was pretty fuckin' awesome to watch.

gorefreak 10-24-2005 07:50 PM

Darkness.... unfortuneately. Not enough happens in the movie and the storyline is dragged out too much.

bwind22 10-25-2005 12:31 AM

Land of the Dead (again)

I really didn't notice any differences between the unrated directors cut and the theatrical version and since I was a bit diappointed in it the first time I saw it, nothing has changed. The gore is cool, but it fails to live up to the standards Romero set for himself with Night, Dawn and Day.

B+



On deck: House of Wax (remake), Mystery Science Theatre: Manos The Hands of Fate, and Haute Tension

gorefreak 10-25-2005 04:41 AM

Yeah, I'm really dissappointed that "unrated" might mean 2 extra minutes of a lame scene, not like 5 extra minutes where maybe 20 seconds for each nasty scene is headpounding gore. Now it seems to be nothing more than a lousy marketing ploy. :(

I missed that "Zombie Flesh Eaters" one. Fulchi's "Zombie". lol@that. That movie must have like 5 or 6 different names. The only thing I don't understand, why would someone call it "Zombie 2? Always makes me think "well, than what was 'Zombie 1' then?" ;)

newb 10-25-2005 05:00 AM

Watched "Unleashed" aka Danny the Dog, last night. Some great fight scenes but pretty predictable.Biggest gripe

***SPOILER***






I wanted Jet to kill Bob Hoskins

alkytrio666 10-25-2005 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gorefreak
Yeah, I'm really dissappointed that "unrated" might mean 2 extra minutes of a lame scene, not like 5 extra minutes where maybe 20 seconds for each nasty scene is headpounding gore. Now it seems to be nothing more than a lousy marketing ploy. :(

I missed that "Zombie Flesh Eaters" one. Fulchi's "Zombie". lol@that. That movie must have like 5 or 6 different names. The only thing I don't understand, why would someone call it "Zombie 2? Always makes me think "well, than what was 'Zombie 1' then?" ;)

"Zombie 1" = Romero's 'Dawn of the Dead'

Fulci had so much respect for this movie that he wanted to make his a kind of "second" film. Not really a sequel, but more like he couldn't compare his movie to Romero's.

alkytrio666 10-25-2005 09:41 AM

Anyway, this weekend I saw:

*Wallace and Grommit in The Curse of the Were-Rabbit- 5/5...pretty damn good, plus W+G shaped my childhood. :D

*The Fog ('05)- 1.5/5...pretty damn horrible.

bwind22 10-25-2005 06:51 PM

House of Wax (remake)

There was some alright gore and Paris Hilton's poor acting ability didn't even really stand out because 1. she wasn't in it that much and 2. the rest of the cast wasn't that great either. The plot was similar to the original but it has definately been modeernized and given a Hollywood touch. It was right on par with what I expected which was some cheesy entertainment, but nothing spectacular.

C+


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 PM.