Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Horror.com General Forum (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Sequel Tournament (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6497)

Arioch 06-07-2004 03:31 AM

Halloween 2 is a far superior sequel, than NOES 2 which was the worst of the entire NOES series....

thEsounDofdirT 06-07-2004 03:32 AM

NOES II - 2
Halloween 2 - 1

Freddy Krueger. 06-07-2004 03:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by thEsounDofdirT
dude... freddy is cool and all... but he kills because he was an abused child... you know... raised by ALICE COOPER... michael is a killer just because he is evil... michael deserves respect too :)
You must'nt have read the story on his child days. No one made fun of him at first. They wanted him to be there friend. But he IS the son of a hundred maniacs. He was the silent type. The kid who didn't get along well will the others in the ophanage. Then when he got older the kids stated to tease him. He was already kinda evil before this because they started to tease him after he killed the pet hamster. Then he got adopted by a mean drunk how only wanted him to get the child money. He abused him, which didn't help wll with his already evilness. All the abuse raised his rage up and anger too. He then learned that if you can just stop feeling pain, you can learn how to use it. And thats what he did. He became immune to pain. He got satitfaction from killing others, so thats what he did. He loved the thrill of killing the younger ones. Mainly because he was treated so badly as a child, he couldn't stand seeing peace among those who abused him both mentaly and phyicaly.

So, what I am trying to say, is that he was abused but he was evil before he was.

thEsounDofdirT 06-07-2004 03:44 AM

yea i've read that.. but michael lived in a healthy home... he wasn't abused... he wasn't the offspring of maniacs... he had no genetic predisposition.. he was just pure evil

i'm not saying one is better than the other.. i love both to death.. i'm just saying, michael is no fag... PLUS... michael was the first serial killer type slasher that was successful

nine9 06-07-2004 04:04 AM

Halloween......didn't like the second NOES. Different director. Not as good.

thEsounDofdirT 06-07-2004 04:07 AM

i think this one'll be close...
NOES II - 2 votes
Halloween 2 - 2 votes

actually.. most of the nightmare movies had different directors :)

nine9 06-07-2004 04:13 AM

Not sure, but I know the second did anyway, it had a different feel to it, so I was disappointed, but the third is one of my favorites in the series!

By the way dirt, I went to your site and posted there. Going to go back to hear more of your music, sounds cool! But right now it is 7am.....going to work for 10, and I'm going back to sleep!

thEsounDofdirT 06-07-2004 04:22 AM

yea the only ones that wes associated with were 1, 3, and 7

:) and cool about going to my site.. i really appreciate that

Freddy Krueger. 06-07-2004 04:27 AM

Wes Craven should've directed ALL of the Nightmare movies.

thEsounDofdirT 06-07-2004 04:29 AM

you know for some reason.. i really like number 2 and 5.. it seems like everybody likes those least (in addition to 6)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 AM.