you just like the pedo character in the movie :p
...played by Tim Roth ?

Do I? Oh...right.
Hysterical.

And it's Steve Buscemi, thanks for the expert and astute input though.

EDIT: And actually why was he a 'pedo' as you put it?
Because he does no harm, of any kind at all, to the child?
I guess that makes most of the population of the World 'pedos' then as most of the people on Earth have also done no harm, of any kind at all, to a child as well.

watch the film more closely next time, THEN treat us to your points.

He wasn't a pedo anyway...he was a serial killer.
The character was meant to have killed over 30 people, wearing somebody's head as a hat. Nothing is mentioned about any offences relating to the underaged, or even pertaining to anything of a sexual nature.
So what? He had a tea party with a little girl...the guy was fucking nuts. You DID, however, see that the little girl was left unassaulted.
I think Buscemi should play Johnny the homicidal maniac (not that it will ever happen)...he had the right presence...

You were supposed to think that the lunatic psycho killer was going to kill the little girl, because he was a lunatic psycho killer, especially when you see him leaving, dazed, with a doll. It was irony, as cheeba said, he was never a pedophile.The irony was that hanging out with a little girl for a while made him decide not to kill again. silly, yes, but hey, it was a bruckheimer movie.

...what I can remember... that scene with the little girl got pedophile undertones...atleast the movie wanted the watcher to believe he was a pedo.....sorry about the name though