probably, but do you think more people analyse a film with bad writing and confused narative like the saw movies timeline or good movies with neat naratives? or does bad writing simply give you spaces to fill in or would good writing do that in a clever way?

if i cant be bothered to analyse it then i tell people to just accept it for what it is and to not try to think about it too much....otherwise i go to town on subtext....

subtext is great tho,

yeah you know me and subtext and saw 3 had a lot of it with amanda

saw 3 had so much with amanda it brought the other 2 into it and will probably bring number 4 into it if shes mentioned

she just seemed to dominate the film...like how when another character was talking the camera would follow her outside of jigsaws little medical room...bet you know the bit i mean....it follows her slowly like us watching her secretly

i thik i kow the bit you mean, and yeah and since jigsaw couldnt get up and no one gives a flying fuck about lynn and jeff amanda was the only one to base the movie on its deffinately her movie

saw 3-amandas story.......aka amandas game :rolleyes:

yes and may she have many more games in the future

thats all some good posting