Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Latest Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=35)
-   -   Jason X (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25408)

knife_fight 10-20-2006 08:33 PM

I quite enjoyed that post, BudMan.

one of the reasons I didn't like Jason X is the same reason I don't like most movies: I felt like the money spent on it could have gone to a better film. I love cheese. I own numerous terrible movies, which I love. however, most of those movies were terrible because they (almost) didn't have a choice. granted, some fantastic flicks have been made with little, or no, money (Halloween, Texas Chainsaw, etc.), but I always wonder what some movies (or certain filmmakers) could have done with a bigger budget.

I know plenty of people personally that could have used the money spent on Jason X and made a brilliant film.

I know this is kinda like arguing about what Elvis or Jimi Hendrix would be doing if they were still alive (as in, it's completely pointless), but to me it's a valid reason for disliking a movie.

Despare 10-20-2006 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knife_fight (Post 492802)
I quite enjoyed that post, BudMan.

one of the reasons I didn't like Jason X is the same reason I don't like most movies: I felt like the money spent on it could have gone to a better film. I love cheese. I own numerous terrible movies, which I love. however, most of those movies were terrible because they (almost) didn't have a choice. granted, some fantastic flicks have been made with little, or no, money (Halloween, Texas Chainsaw, etc.), but I always wonder what some movies (or certain filmmakers) could have done with a bigger budget.

I know plenty of people personally that could have used the money spent on Jason X and made a brilliant film.

I know this is kinda like arguing about what Elvis or Jimi Hendrix would be doing if they were still alive (as in, it's completely pointless), but to me it's a valid reason for disliking a movie.


I don't know, sometimes I think more money can ruin a film. Sometimes having to be creative because you lack money prevents lame, overpriced CGI and overpaid, overexposed actors.

_____V_____ 10-20-2006 09:24 PM

Very nice post, Bud. Thanks bro I loved reading that. :)

Quote:

1988
May 12-13 (Friday) - Tommy, now a grown-up 16-year-old, is released from the mental institution. When he digs up Jason's grave, intending to cremate him, Jason is reanimated by a bolt of lightning. Jason kills his way toward Camp Forest Green, which is once again attempting to open its doors to campers. Tommy drowns Jason in Lake Forest Green (Crystal Lake) and the camp is shut down permanently. (Friday the 13th Part VI)
perfect end to what could have been an awesome franchise.

Quote:

1989
October 13 (Friday) - John Shepard is killed when his 13 year-old daughter Tina uses her telekinetic powers to collapse the dock on which he is standing. Tina is sent to a mental hospital. (Friday the 13th Part VII prologue)
1993
October 13 (Friday) Stephanie Kimble, daughter of Jessica Kimble and Steven Freeman, is born.

August 13 (Friday) - Tina Shepard, now 17, returns to Crystal Lake with her mother and her psychiatrist, Dr. Crews. Tina accidentally raises Jason with her telekinesis, and he goes on another murderous rampage. Tina finally forces Jason back into the lake. (Friday the 13th Part VII)
^^^ thats where it started to become really shitty.

But thinking on the other side of the coin, the people who made Jason X didnt have much to go on for, after Jason goes to Hell. Hence the setting of the future, space etc, desperately hoping to wrap the terror of Jason into an Alien-esque type atmosphere. The movie wasnt bad at all, considering from that point of view. I dont see why people keep bashing it up.

You will agree with me that continuity of a franchise is a tough job to keep up with. Especially after 8 sequels have been made before. We wont have a brilliant F13 sequel or FvJ anymore, but maybe some good watchable ones. For that matter, no sequel to a popular cult classic can be deemed to be excellent, except perhaps Aliens. But that had the Cameron touch, hence it can be regarded as the only exception.

knife_fight 10-20-2006 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Despare (Post 492810)
I don't know, sometimes I think more money can ruin a film. Sometimes having to be creative because you lack money prevents lame, overpriced CGI and overpaid, overexposed actors.

I think that was the point of what I posted, or at least I meant it to be (whether it came across that way or not). the F13 franchise was something, at that point, that was a problem (the problem being that the people who made the movies knew there was more money to be bled from the series, but didn't quite know how to go about doing it) that the producers felt they could throw money at to fix it.

X¤MurderDoll¤X 10-21-2006 01:44 AM

I actually like all the other ones. Yeah sure, I know it's the same crap over and over. I watch them because I just really want to see Jason kill everyone, all the kids in the movies are dumb and painfully death-worthy. I don't mind that much that he does it the same way every time.

Also there is usually one person in every one of the movies that reminds me of someone I hate.

on the other hand the effects really sucked, could use a remake with good gore.

Despare 10-21-2006 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knife_fight (Post 492840)
I think that was the point of what I posted, or at least I meant it to be (whether it came across that way or not). the F13 franchise was something, at that point, that was a problem (the problem being that the people who made the movies knew there was more money to be bled from the series, but didn't quite know how to go about doing it) that the producers felt they could throw money at to fix it.


Oh, when you said that you knew people who could make a better movie with all that money I thought you meant something else.

jason myers 10-24-2006 03:07 AM

i actually liked jason x, it brought something original to the table and nice amount of killing, finally at least a plot with some twist, not just the same " kids come to camp, kids f*ck, kids get drunk, kids dead" i really think its much better then part 2,5,7,8,9

weevus897 10-28-2006 10:25 PM

you either love or hate this movie.. but as a fanatic of the friday the 13th series i love it.. i mean they took the slasher movie to a whole new level.. hes even unstoppable in space!!

Elvis_Christ 10-28-2006 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X (Post 492855)
Also there is usually one person in every one of the movies that reminds me of someone I hate.


Like me :)

the_real_linda 10-30-2006 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Despare (Post 492810)
I don't know, sometimes I think more money can ruin a film. Sometimes having to be creative because you lack money prevents lame, overpriced CGI and overpaid, overexposed actors.


hit it on the head....money detracts (sometimes) away from the rawness and raw talent of the people who make it....its the same for music as far as im concerned....overproduced sounds too smooth...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:45 PM.