Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Latest Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=35)
-   -   Last Seen Contemporary Movie (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=63920)

ChronoGrl 02-09-2014 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giganticface (Post 964831)
I watched this last night and thought it was absolutely brilliant. The three leads couldn't be more believable, and Lyn Shelton's writing and direction masterfully constructed a subtle build-up of dude vs dude competitiveness, resulting in a hilarious and absurd situation. Highly recommended.

So glad you liked it!

...


Quote:

Originally Posted by Khaleesi (Post 964876)
Grrr, I was in the hospital half the week, which almost made me go through horror movie-withdrawal.

Hope everything's OK! Sending thoughts of warmth and health your way.



...

I haven't been feeling great lately, which required some comfort movies -


Butter (2011)


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...pscb0ca6ce.jpg


Second-time viewing and I loved it even more this time around. I love the characters, I love the actors - Everyone is simply brilliant and this movie turns well on sweet moments to dirty humor. Olivia Wilde is simply STUNNING and a scene-stealer, Jennifer Garner is brilliant, and Rob Corddry is really charming. I love this little movie. Definitely recommended.

4.5/5


...


Young Adult (2011)


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps4ed0a042.jpg


This was my second time watching this movie and I loved it even more. I think it's a sad but honest and accurate portrayal of a woman going through a midlife crisis. Well-written and brilliantly acted, Charlize Theron is incredible to watch as her character just implodes. And Patton Oswalt is really sympathetic and charming. Definitely recommended as a good, solid character drama.


4.75/5


...


Your Sister's Sister (2011)


My Mark Duplass fix of the week! I liked it. Not as much as I liked, say, Humpday or True Adolescents, but Duplass was really charming (yep, used that word three times in this post already!) - The end is a little too neat for my taste, but it was a good little watch. Duplass, Emily Blunt, and Rosemarie DeWitt have great chemistry together. Good little character piece.


3.5/5


...


Jucy (2010)


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps2447f482.jpg


Cute little Buddy Chick Flick. Will probably be ultimately forgettable, but it's cute.

Baron Von Marlon 02-09-2014 06:08 PM

Jackass presents: Bad Grandpa
Even funnier than I expected.

roshiq 02-10-2014 01:10 AM

Odd Thomas (2013)

http://i346.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps0b1eac75.jpg

>>: B+

Pacific Rim (2013)

http://i346.photobucket.com/albums/p...pse580f39a.jpg

>>: B+

hammerfan 02-10-2014 04:59 AM

Chrono - regarding "Butter", I thought my man Hugh Jackman did a damn good job, too! LOL

urgeok2 02-10-2014 05:31 AM

K-Pax

First time i've seen it - not bad. Not a light of weight - but not bad

The Wolverine

saw it in the theatres when it came out - this was the first home viewing.
great action but fairly weak in the character development.
Still a fun watch ...

ChronoGrl 02-10-2014 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hammerfan (Post 964945)
Chrono - regarding "Butter", I thought my man Hugh Jackman did a damn good job, too! LOL

YES! He was EXCELLENT! I thought that both the main actors and the bit parts were great - Such a fun little movie.

hammerfan 02-10-2014 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChronoGrl (Post 964958)
YES! He was EXCELLENT! I thought that both the main actors and the bit parts were great - Such a fun little movie.

It definitely is. I was a little nervous going into it, but really enjoyed it.

realdealblues 02-10-2014 08:48 AM

I finally got to see Thor 2: The Dark World.

Enjoyable enough, though pretty much what I expected. I think I liked the story of the first one a little better, but this one had a lot more special effects that were cool to see.

The Villain 02-10-2014 10:30 AM

Her
Thumb resize.

Sad and very moving. One of Joaquin Phoenix's best performances if not his best

Baron Von Marlon 02-10-2014 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Khaleesi (Post 963715)
Agreed. I loved this film. I have a B.A. in History and I'm hoping to specialize in the history of institutions when I eventually move on to graduate school. In my undergrad years, my first dissertation was on TB hospitals, although I think it would be really cool to branch out and study youth reformatories like the one featured in "King of Devil's Island".

I just remembered another one:

The Major Of Hell (1933)
Five members of a teen-age gang, including leader Jimmy Smith, are sent to the State Reformatory, presided over by the melodramatically callous Thompson. Soon, Patsy Gargan, a former gangster appointed Deputy Commissioner as a political favor, arrives complete with hip flask and blonde. Gargan falls for activist nurse Dorothy and, inspired by her, takes over the administration to run the place on radical principles. But Thompson, to conceal his years of graft, needs a quick way to discredit Gargan...

I thought it was a great movie but I'm a bit of a James Cagney fan.

ChronoGrl 02-10-2014 11:47 AM

^^ I am so very excited to see Her! Maybe a date night next weekend with the Mr.


...


The Kings of Summer (2013)


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ps5411f110.jpg


Meh. Fairly average coming-of-age movie, and honestly not very believable. Two of the three male characters are really awful and the third is a strange alien thing that is over-the-top and not realistic. Both sets of parents are also either boring and/or unrealistic.

Didn't really like this.

I think of Stand By Me and how much that movie worked in terms of its realism, humor, and melancholy - And it just worked. Kings of Summer just didn't.


...


The Darjeeling Limited (2007)


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...psa6380bb5.jpg


One of my favorite movies ever and I think my favorite Wes Anderson. I get something new out of it every time I see it. And bawl my eyes out at the same time each viewing. Love this movie.

urgeok2 02-11-2014 06:46 AM

X-Men - First Class

continuing my kid's run on marvel movies ...
I'll just say the same thing I do with all superhero movies .. it was fun.

There hasn't been one I haven't liked yet - I dig seeing the comics of my youth come to life onscreen, still remembering very clearly being at an age where I never thought the stuff we take for granted in movies now would ever be possible

newb 02-11-2014 07:44 AM

Big Bad Wolves....by Israeli directors Aharon Keshales and Navot Papushado.

excellent really dark comedy of sorts

reminded me of Prisoners but with a twisted sense of humor

Fearonsarms 02-11-2014 09:03 AM

Before Dawn (2012)

An ok little zombie film.Nothing amazing and fairly predictable. Was a bit too slow paced but made up for that with fast zombies when they do appear.

Angra 02-11-2014 10:30 AM

"Under the Bed" 7/10

Decent boogeyman movie. The ending was kind of a letdown tho.

Khaleesi 02-11-2014 02:06 PM

My cure for the midwinter blues....Crank up the heat, make some hot chocolate with a dash of heavy cream and settle into bed with these babies:

Cold Prey (2007): Liked it a lot, though I had the ending figured out in the first five seconds.

Cassadaga (2011): Corny as hell, but the marionette scenes were acceptably grotesque.

A Field in England (2013): Again, I liked this one. I'm starting to develop a serious crush on Ben Wheatley as a director. Could there be a resurgence of English folk horror underway?

Texas Chainsaw (2013): A moderately enjoyable slasher that kept me distracted and entertained for an hour and a half.

Gosh, I'm on a weird streak of liking everything I see lately. Is it something in the hot chocolate?

ChronoGrl 02-12-2014 06:17 AM

Cold Prey is great! One of the best modern slasher films for sure IMO - The sequel is pretty damn good too.

Fearonsarms 02-12-2014 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Khaleesi (Post 965059)

Cold Prey (2007): Liked it a lot, though I had the ending figured out in the first five seconds.

Cassadaga (2011): Corny as hell, but the marionette scenes were acceptably grotesque.

A Field in England (2013): Again, I liked this one. I'm starting to develop a serious crush on Ben Wheatley as a director. Could there be a resurgence of English folk horror underway?

Loved these especially A Field In England great stuff :)

Citadel (2012) This was quite good, portraying the hoodie horrors (feral children) as almost demonic entities, feeding off fear and there is a lot of that in the lead character. The settings are lovely and grim plus some brutal (though there's no gore which this film doesn't need) scenes make this worth a watch.

Despare 02-12-2014 06:58 AM

The Last Stand... I was in the mood for an action flick and this one was pretty damn entertaining. I've been wanting to see it for a while, Kim Jee-woon (Tale of Two Sisters/The Good, The Bad, and the Weird/I Saw the Devil) directing a very Western style action flick intrigued me. I've liked everything of his that I've seen so far.

urgeok2 02-12-2014 07:47 PM

Let Him Be

Small Canadian mocumentary about a guy who finds a tape in a garage sale video camera that shows footage of what he believes is John Lennon.

He then takes his girlfriend-partner on a road trip to find out if it's really Lennon, hiding out in a small town north of Toronto.

It was ok - not great - but an interesting idea - and the guy they found to play an aged John Lennon was dead perfect (so that was heavily milked)

Sculpt 02-13-2014 12:11 AM

"Tremors" 1990 5/10

Modern Western monster comedy thriller with Kevin Bacon. It was OK. Somewhat likeable shallow characters, extremely formulaic, and not at all funny. I'd give it a 5/10, or a 2/5. I apologize ahead of time to anyone who loved it, when I say, I heard this movie was very good, and if this passes for very good, I have to guess the general public's standards for Horror movies, or films in general, are comparably much lower than mine.

Angra 02-13-2014 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sculpt (Post 965138)
"Tremors" 1990

... I apologize ahead of time to anyone who loved it, when I say, I heard this movie was very good, and if this passes for very good, I have to guess the general public's standards for Horror movies, or films in general, are comparably much lower than mine.

That is correct, sir. You're a regular horror movie snob. And a heathen. :D

cheebacheeba 02-13-2014 02:36 AM

Well...I mean if you want to consider tremors "horror" you probably started that journey in the wrong place.

The Villain 02-13-2014 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheebacheeba (Post 965144)
Well...I mean if you want to consider tremors "horror" you probably started that journey in the wrong place.

Its about giant monsters under the ground that eat people. How's that not horror?

urgeok2 02-13-2014 04:31 AM

It's about fun cartoonish characters and big rubber monsters.
Key word = fun.
Not all 'horror' has to be bad-ass hardcore.
I think there should be more like this one - family friendly creature features - a throwback to the 50's sci-fi rubber monster films where the characters actually mattered.

the film is really about Kevin Bacon and Fred Ward's chemistry - without that this film would not have the following it still has today.

The Villain 02-13-2014 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by urgeok2 (Post 965153)
It's about fun cartoonish characters and big rubber monsters.
Key word = fun.
Not all 'horror' has to be bad-ass hardcore.
I think there should be more like this one - family friendly creature features - a throwback to the 50's sci-fi rubber monster films where the characters actually mattered.

the film is really about Kevin Bacon and Fred Ward's chemistry - without that this film would not have the following it still has today.

Exactly how I feel about it. Its still a horror movie but as you said a fun, family friendly creature feature.

I think a lot of people, not saying Sculpt and Cheeba, have a narrow view of what horror is.

There's definite moments where it tries to be scary and suspenseful and there's a heavy feeling of isolation throughout the movie. The creatures, despite having a silly name, arent portrayed as goofy and ridiculous, like the spiders in Eight Legged Freaks for example, and there's real fear from the characters.

Not a lovable doofus slacker stoner getting scared to entertain the audience but characters getting really scared.

I agree on Bacon and Wards chemistry. It really made the movie stand out.

cheebacheeba 02-13-2014 06:07 AM

I get your point.
I'd say by my own definition it's not really horror.
In subject matter maye, in tone and presentation, not really at all.
It was jovial, fun. More like an "adventure" movie.
Though if your expectation was a horror film that was "horrific", and had tastes as such, clearly this is not the film to best suit.

The Villain 02-13-2014 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheebacheeba (Post 965155)
I get your point.
I'd say by my own definition it's not really horror.
In subject matter maye, in tone and presentation, not really at all.
It was jovial, fun. More like an "adventure" movie.
Though if your expectation was a horror film that was "horrific", and had tastes as such, clearly this is not the film to best suit.

Yeah that makes sense. I could see how someone would be disappointed in that aspect

Khaleesi 02-13-2014 07:08 AM

Carrie (2013). It was okay. No big thrills or chills. Passable, I guess. For some reason, I find Sissy Spacek to be the more sympathetic Carrie. Chloe Grace Moretz was too bright-eyed and cute for the role. I actually haven't read the book yet, but isn't Carrie supposed to be extremely unattractive in the novel?

Sculpt 02-13-2014 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angra (Post 965141)
That is correct, sir. You're a regular horror movie snob. And a heathen. :D

LOL I'm happy to see more discussion in this thread. I am a bit snobbish in regards to film quality. Although, I should say, I really do appreciate films that know what they are; and stay focussed to do that type of film well (as opposed to a film trying to be everything and failing.) I do appreciate Tremors mostly concentrating on being that "Tarantula" 50's sci-fi film. Towards that, it was OK, but not very good, IMO.
Quote:

Originally Posted by cheebacheeba (Post 965144)
Well...I mean if you want to consider tremors "horror" you probably started that journey in the wrong place.

I did, and do, consider Tremors in that big fat category of Horror; joining Young Frankenstein, Ghostbusters, Anachrophobia, etc.

Before seeing it, I didn't know it was going to be heavily a snarky humor horror, but that didn't rub me the wrong way, or ruin my impression of it. I like good well-timed humor in any genre.
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Villain (Post 965152)
Its about giant monsters under the ground that eat people. How's that not horror?

Yep.
Quote:

Originally Posted by urgeok2 (Post 965153)
It's about fun cartoonish characters and big rubber monsters.
Key word = fun.
Not all 'horror' has to be bad-ass hardcore.
I think there should be more like this one - family friendly creature features - a throwback to the 50's sci-fi rubber monster films where the characters actually mattered.

the film is really about Kevin Bacon and Fred Ward's chemistry - without that this film would not have the following it still has today.

I totally agree that the Bacon and Ward's chemistry was the best part of the movie, and really saved it's life, because I think it's a really weak script. Both Bacon and Ward are able to work some magic and a some humor in dried-up script.

Strictly speaking, it's not Family Friendly, only because it's oddly heavy on the language, dropping F and MF bombs and the rest. I think it's rated R because of it. There's no sex, and the graphic violence is relatively tame (there's PGs with more).

I agree with you, there should be more family friendly films like this one. The F-bombs were unnecessary; and I think were at cross purposes with the film's strengths.
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Villain (Post 965154)
Exactly how I feel about it. Its still a horror movie but as you said a fun, family friendly creature feature.

I think a lot of people, not saying Sculpt and Cheeba, have a narrow view of what horror is.

There's definite moments where it tries to be scary and suspenseful and there's a heavy feeling of isolation throughout the movie. The creatures, despite having a silly name, arent portrayed as goofy and ridiculous, like the spiders in Eight Legged Freaks for example, and there's real fear from the characters.

Not a lovable doofus slacker stoner getting scared to entertain the audience but characters getting really scared.

I agree on Bacon and Wards chemistry. It really made the movie stand out.

Agreed. I think some of the funniest lines in film history are surrounded by the most intense sincere moments of dread, horror, tenderness, etc. IMO this film wasn't able to capture much suspense, humor or horror.
Quote:

Originally Posted by cheebacheeba (Post 965155)
I get your point.
I'd say by my own definition it's not really horror.
In subject matter maye, in tone and presentation, not really at all.
It was jovial, fun. More like an "adventure" movie.
Though if your expectation was a horror film that was "horrific", and had tastes as such, clearly this is not the film to best suit.

Agreed, it was mainly a fun buddy adventure film, which was enjoyable. Those are some of my favorite films, like Bogus Journey for instance. Comparatively speaking, I wouldn't say Tremors is a great buddy adventure film by a long shot. But that is what is enjoyable about it.

Sculpt 02-13-2014 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Khaleesi (Post 965161)
Carrie (2013). It was okay. No big thrills or chills. Passable, I guess. For some reason, I find Sissy Spacek to be the more sympathetic Carrie. Chloe Grace Moretz was too bright-eyed and cute for the role. I actually haven't read the book yet, but isn't Carrie supposed to be extremely unattractive in the novel?

Exactly! Why the hell would anyone use a very attractive actress for a Carrie remake? The plot and narrative cluelessness of Hollywood execs never cease to amaze me. The casting of Sissy Spacek was genius, and at the same time common logic. I'm saying Sissy is ugly, or that attractive people can't be socially awkward, nor that Chloe Grace Moretz couldn't play the role well... I'm just saying choosing a stunning beauty like Moretz contradicts the original story, one of it's core strengths, immediately handicapping the film.

hammerfan 02-14-2014 03:35 AM

Epic

Yes, it's a kids movie. Yes, I enjoyed it. ::cool::

Ferox13 02-14-2014 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sculpt (Post 965188)
The casting of Sissy Spacek was genius, and at the same time common logic. I'm saying Sissy is ugly, or that attractive people can't be socially awkward, nor that Chloe Grace Moretz couldn't play the role well...

I have a feeling that critics said Sissy Spacek wasn't ugly enough in the original either.

urgeok2 02-14-2014 08:34 AM

played as 'plain' instead of ugly ..

There is a funny Hollywood notion that has always existed that if a girl isn't blonde with big tits and a plunging neckline then she's plain.

just mess her hair up a bit, loose clothes and glasses and 'poof' ugly!

I always thought that was stupid.

Want to see a hot Spacek, check out Prime Cut

roshiq 02-14-2014 10:20 PM

You're Next (2011)

http://i346.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps053fbb62.jpg

>>: B

Baron Von Marlon 02-15-2014 08:21 AM

Dazed & Confused
Second time I watched this movie.
Love movies like this.
Reminds me American Graffiti, but set in the 70's.
Also has a great soundtrack.

"Now me and my loser friends are gonna head out to buy Aerosmith tickets. Top priority of the summer. "

NightOfTheLiving_Sam 02-15-2014 09:01 AM

We Are What We Are 2013
7/10


http://static3.aintitcool.com/assets...whatweare2.jpg

Sculpt 02-15-2014 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferox13 (Post 965219)
I have a feeling that critics said Sissy Spacek wasn't ugly enough in the original either.

I'm glad you were able to tell I meant to type, "I'm not saying Sissy Spacek was ugly". I suppose I need to proof read better; especially since we can't re-edit our posts after a certain time.

I would be very surprised if, at the time Carrie came out, any big paper critics said Sissy Spacek wasn't ugly enough for the role. Sissy is unusual looking. They didn't need to "ugly" her up. She just went makeup free, and played the wall flower to a tee. I would never watch Carrie and think she was too pretty.

Quote:

Originally Posted by urgeok2 (Post 965226)
played as 'plain' instead of ugly ..

There is a funny Hollywood notion that has always existed that if a girl isn't blonde with big tits and a plunging neckline then she's plain.

just mess her hair up a bit, loose clothes and glasses and 'poof' ugly!

I always thought that was stupid.

Want to see a hot Spacek, check out Prime Cut

That is so true. That's exactly what "Hollywood" tends to do. It really drives me nuts because there are extremely talented actors who don't have model looks, and they fit the role better. If anyone in Hollywood thinks I wouldn't want to see a film unless there were good looking actors in it, they are mistaken. I prefer to think the vast majority of my fellow audience members think the same way.

In Prime Cut you can see her good facial symmetry, great skin, intelligence, and not to mention youth goes a long way in obvious areas. Despite survey averages, sexiness and attractiveness are subjective. I wouldn't be one of those saying Sissy Speck is a stunning hot beauty.

roshiq 02-16-2014 12:42 AM

Devil's Pass aka The Dyatlov Pass Incident (2013)

http://i346.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps033b0679.jpg

Liked that little twist at the end which made it bit different than other films with similar premise. But expected to see a 'lot more of' Gemma Atkinson!::wink::

>>: B+

Aftershock (2012)

http://i346.photobucket.com/albums/p...psda1d6bd6.jpg

>>: C

Elvis_Christ 02-16-2014 05:22 AM

Nebraska

Thumb resize.

Beautifully shot and poignant. Loved it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:11 AM.