"The Ouija Experiment 2 Theatre of Death" 2/10

Wow, that was... Wow.

Worst idea for a story ever.

If you've seen the first movie. You haven't? Well, just keep it that way.

http://i1281.photobucket.com/albums/...ps1a085bfc.jpg

5/10

http://i1281.photobucket.com/albums/...psa0c377ba.jpg

7/10

I was looking forward to Altitude and thought the poster was good. I felt people should be warned that the movie isn't very good. I personally like to know a bit more about a movie in reviews. Someone on HorrorDVDs mentioned this same thing when posting which movies people watched during Halloween. Posting a list vs posting a list with thoughts.

Many times I see what people watched here and I have to check the movie on IMDB to see what it was about. Or they post the poster art and a number review and I think the poster looks good so I look that up.

If I posted a review on the Friday the 13th remake for example and just said "Crap" wouldn't you want to know why? Most horror fans will check the movie out anyway. But if I gave a paragraph or so maybe it wouldn't be a immediate watch. And you could watch something better instead like a Triangle for example.

"Mother's Milk" 6/10

Lovely title, lovely movie.

A story about a woman held captive by her slightly sick milk-loving captor.

Bon appétit.

feed the gods

2 brothers go backto the town where they were "born" only for people to go missing due to a mountain "monster" no real tension, scares or substance. 5/10

"In a Heartbeat/Bloodshot" 3/10

Except for a dream sequence at the end I failed to see the horror in this long bore of something that should've been a 15 minutes short.

I believe this movie will only appeal to die hard Danny Dyer fans, unless you're in the mood for an awful bad romance.

I'm just saying that one word is better than nothing at all.

I think you have a lot more patience than I do. That sounds like something I wouldn't have been able to finish.

Coz if I'd given up on it I wouldn't have been able to write this review, would I?::big grin::