Its very hard to compare Argento Fulci And Romereo they all do very different things but in terms of actual skill in directing etc im going to have to say Argento, but the only reason i say that is because he shows such a wide range of films, whereas Romereo really only has a limited amount, all based on the same re occuring theme

Not really, he has alot of different movies.
But I won't go against you opinion.
Because my personal opinion about Argento(After seeing Deep Red) is that I don't want to see much more of his movies...But I need to.
Because one is never enough.

I like Fulci though, alot of people give him bad credit.
I like his movies.

yeah your right oh wait no

1)dead trilogy
2)monkey shines (killer monkey)
3)dark half (evil twin)
4)creepshow (short stories)
5)bruiser (slasher)
6)martin (vampire)
and the list goes on and on

balzac

balzac is great. i will go with argento.

Hmmm...tough one, but I'll have to with the majority here: Romero.

1000 posts, whoo to the hoo! :cool:

you're a special kind of retarded, aren't you?

It isnt hard to say his name.

Well if I really would have to pick one, I'd say Romero. To tell you the truth I think Fulci id kind of a hack :)but everyone has diffrent views I guess.

Did anyone see the Argento cut on the new dawn of the dead Special Edition that came out?? Its waaaayyyyy diffrent.


But staying on topic I'd say Romero, Dawn is my favorite movie of all time...Well that and Evil Dead :)

Yes, he is a hack.
A hack that made some decent movies.:D
Zombie is one of my favorite movies.
And he was also impsired by the Romero film.

the guy who made 28 days later mixed Night of The Living Dead with Romero's Crazies.


And I have to say...It is a match between Dawn and Day to me.
I love the music on dawn, but day..Day is just so cool