Mr. See owned a saw.
And Mr. Soar owned a seesaw.
Now, See's saw sawed Soar's seesaw
Before Soar saw See,
Which made Soar sore.
Had Soar seen See's saw
Before See sawed Soar's seesaw,
See's saw would not have sawed
Soar's seesaw.
So See's saw sawed Soar's seesaw.
But it was sad to see Soar so sore
just because See's saw sawed
Soar's seesaw.

Ow ow OW!!!

...but, I thought we were talking about a trilogy?

This just keeps getting more confusing...

I saw a saw in Saw but I am not sure if its the same saw she saw in Saw.

If its the same saw she saw in Saw, then that saw was the same saw I saw in Saw.

That is, if she saw the same Saw I saw named Saw.

See Saw

yes its the same saw that you saw.

and nice ryme.

marianne