*sigh* I thought you may have learned from our last encounter, but it appears not.

Did I say it didn't happen? If I did I would like you to quote me and show me where I said that.

Lastly, what I said was a fact, the news is never 100% accurate unbiased facts, they air what gets them ratings. If this wern't true, news stations, and papers wouldn't have to print apologies to certain people who they discreditted.

I suggest you go back and re-read our last debate before you post more useless nonsence.

You know what, you're right. And guess what, nothing you say is 100% unbiased either. So I think I'm going to stop listening to you.

But uh.. just to clear things up. She was 57, collapsed during the movie, was taken to a hospital where she later died. But you know what, you're right again. Those facts are all biased.

Oh, and I suggest you learn to spell. I'd point them all out, but there's too many mistakes, and I don't feel like writing them all out.

*rools his eyes and thumps head on table* here we go again... :rolleyes:

Well if people weren't so stupid, there wouldn't be any arguments. Nothing worse than a stupid person :rolleyes:

I can agree with Rotting eye on that one, well the first part of his statement anyways.

I just wanted to make sure this thread wasn't headed the same way those other threads were. The "Jesus died for you" threads seem to never get anywhere.

Im all for talking about the movie as it stands tho.

Good job callin yourself stupid :D

Clever, what next a fart joke? You'l notice it also calls you that also.

I would, but I already made one earlier today.

I thought since you probably didn't figure out that I was infering something from my previous post, I'd spell it out for you.

I'll kindly point out that in our last post I was the one paraphrasing your two paragraph responses into two lines of actual relevant debate.

Seems to be your the last one who can deem anyone low of intellegence.