Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Latest Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=35)
-   -   Texas Chainsaw Massacre (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3300)

Angelakillsluts 01-18-2004 03:04 PM

.......
 
If someone made me choose between wathing the movie again and blowing my brains out, I would have to think about it.

Ritualistic 01-18-2004 03:08 PM

I guess some people feel the same way toward TCM 2003 as I do toward 28 days later.."HATE IT" that one is for you avenger.. :-)

Sick_As_Fuck 01-18-2004 03:41 PM

Re: .......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Angelakillsluts
If someone made me choose between wathing the movie again and blowing my brains out, I would have to think about it.
Wow...

Godspeed 01-18-2004 06:06 PM

For when the original TCM first came out it was pretty gorey to the standards of that time. Then again it was made to be more gorey and shot that way. Yet, it was cut out to get a releasable rating.

billbundix 01-18-2004 06:17 PM

imo it was a cross between the original and scream or any other teenie-bopper movie where the goodguys were "beautiful" people and everyone else was ugly. still pretty good though.

_Leatha_Face_ 01-18-2004 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ritualistic
I guess some people feel the same way toward TCM 2003 as I do toward 28 days later.."HATE IT" that one is for you avenger.. :-)
lol

starseed 01-18-2004 07:35 PM

The new TCM impressed me because I could finally see how the original TCM and the original Psycho were based on the same serial killer. Before then I could never make the connection and they seemed too different to be based on the same person.

I'm I the only one who noticed that?

If you watch TCM 2003 again, I would suggest watching Psycho first.

MACHETEBIG1 01-19-2004 05:41 AM

what the fuck is wrong with you people hell yea the remake was better than the original
wow they take out the hitchhiker"the brother" big fuckin deAL IT HAD MUCH MORE GORE MORE OF A PLOT IT WAS LONGER THERE WAS LESS GOD DAMN SCREAMING WHICH BY THE WAY WAS KIND OF AGRAVATING IN THE FIRST 1.IT HAD MORE SCENES WITH LEATHERFACE IN IT. AND A BETTER CAST: WELL I THINK WITH 1 FLAW THAT AMANDA BIEL OR WHATEVER HER NAME IS TO TAKE A POP- TEEN MOVIE IDOL AND PUT HER IN TCM REMAKE IS DUMB
BUT OTHERE THAN THAT IT IS SUBERB

MACHETEBIG1 01-19-2004 05:45 AM

Re: .......
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Angelakillsluts
[B]If someone made me choose between wathing the movie again and blowing my brains out, I would have to think about it.
Y?I MEAn it was 1 of the best movies of the year in my opinion

Godspeed 01-19-2004 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MACHETEBIG1
what the fuck is wrong with you people hell yea the remake was better than the original
wow they take out the hitchhiker"the brother" big fuckin deAL IT HAD MUCH MORE GORE MORE OF A PLOT IT WAS LONGER THERE WAS LESS GOD DAMN SCREAMING WHICH BY THE WAY WAS KIND OF AGRAVATING IN THE FIRST 1.IT HAD MORE SCENES WITH LEATHERFACE IN IT. AND A BETTER CAST: WELL I THINK WITH 1 FLAW THAT AMANDA BIEL OR WHATEVER HER NAME IS TO TAKE A POP- TEEN MOVIE IDOL AND PUT HER IN TCM REMAKE IS DUMB
BUT OTHERE THAN THAT IT IS SUBERB

lol - I liked the remake but it was no where near better than the original. Better cast? Bigger budget. This movie was made to grab a quick buck from the teen community it was made toward that. The amount of screaming in the first had a point...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:12 AM.