I imagine Dracula had a fairly substantial print run, first of all. And second of all, Stoker was in the habit of autographing things and giving out swag of various kinds. Not to mention the book is a hundred years old. A Stoker autograph would not be such a rare thing. A first edition, not quite so incomprehensible, because as I said, large print run which also drives down the price of rare books. A first edition of The Great Gatsby would be worth a fortune because Scribner's had little faith in the success of the book so did not print that large a run. So 500, which is about a thousand bucks in the states, is a reasonable price for the item I think. I'm not an expert, but I've had some experience with book dealers and know about what drives up the price of collectible books. Also, a dealer is probably not going to sell of a forgery of something as ubiquitous as Dracula and doesn't have all that much to gain from cheating you. Dealers make a profit by fucking the person who sells things to them, not the buyer.

Thanks for the advice. I think it's probably legit but I'm a little short right now. If the book comes back to me and I'm a bit more flush, I may pick it up. It would definitely make an excellent addition to the collection.

If we are going by pre 1969 Dracula actors I think it have to be Christopher Lee. Lugosi's voice and screen presence is amazing however in his roles as Dracula I do not think the script if the character as well. For example I am not the biggest fan of the 1931 Dracula. Do not get me wrong it is a great movie, however it is based on the theater play and not the book which differs allot from one another. Now the Christopher Lee movies are even further from the book, however that is what I like about them, they make a new character and new stories, while 1931 Dracula and later Lugosi movies, which do have their own storylines, try to portray Bram Stoker's character to a much greater degree and failing at it in my opinion.

My favorite Dracula film is the 1992 version with Gary Oldman, it stays true to the book and the only real deviation from it is that Mina's relationship with Dracula is played up, while in the books it is hardly there at all and when it is there is more of a one sided thing where Mina remains a virtuous Victorian wife until Dracula in effect forces himself on her, while in the movie she falls in love with Dracula, but other than that the movie follows Dracula much further. I also love the fact that Oldman do not overplay Dracula as much as both Lee and Lugosi do, the character feel more natural, more like this is the kind of guy you could meet on the street which makes the movie more spooky.

That being said for spookyness Dracula was never that great, Nosferatu is much more scary in my opinion than any Dracula movie I have seen, though it technically is a Dracula movie with the numbers filed off. However the vampire in that movie is creepy, Dracula in most versions on film is not.

Me to, it would be awesome if a roll of it had survived in some attic somewhere and where eventually discovered, and I might be a fool but I have not given up hope that it will one day happen.

From my experience this is a to good to be true price, at least unless the book itself is falling apart so what you are paying for is the signature. I would at least have that book authenticated before paying. The price is not so outrageously low that it can not be real, but I would ask about the condition of the book, and also about if the book have any papers proving it's authenticity, it might be a good deal, but I would be weary.