i definitely dont see how they can say it degrades women. one of the many reasons i want to strangle that bill oreilly character. bitching and complaining at ludicrous for 'degrading' women, when they FLOCK to him, in fuckin HERDS.

these women sign up and yes, several of the more amateur type will make a movie or 2 just to make some quick cash, then later will feel so bad about it. same with the dumb bitches on those 'girls gone wild' movies. but guess what? they were counselled before hand, given all the 'everyone will see this' bs, AND had to sign releases...

so whatever happened to personal responsibility?

it CAN be art, I guess, but pretty much anything can be art

If emo/pop-punk is art, CERTAINLY porn is....

I don't like calling things art. I mean, if it's paintings and sculptures and shit, fine. But I'll hardly ever describe a movie or music or anything as art.

art

better art

the first thing Yahoo Image search found when I searched for "art"
http://www.desktopbilderarchiv.de/su...tronic_art.jpg

ARRRRRT

...now you've just contradicted yourself.i myself are far more inclined to reguard say..."a clockwork orange' as art then..say serrano's "piss christ".

not having seen Piss Christ, I can't agree or disagree with you. There are movies that I would call art (segues this into a cheap plug for the upcoming website), but I won't lump all movies together as 'art'. I mean, by some defenition it's art, sure. I'm not sure I can explain it, I just don't like calling stuff art except for a few very rare exceptions