Originally Posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X (Post 787617)

I think it's worth watching just for the part with Elvis Presley.

Originally Posted by X¤MurderDoll¤X (Post 787617)

I think it's worth watching just for the part with Elvis Presley.

Originally Posted by Roderick Usher (Post 787465)

Coraline

God, I fucking hate 3D. The glasses and the gimmick pull me out of the story. I just can't enjoy a movie with those stupid glasses that reduce your field of vision, distort the color and give me a fucking headache.

I really liked the book but felt this adaptation was a bit weak - the scary bits weren't scary enough, the funny bits weren't funny enough and the voice acting was completely uninspired. I love stop-motion animation and am a fan of both Selick and Gaiman, but this one didn't impress me. I'm looking forward to seeing it in 2D on my television at some point - maybe I'll come around on it.

5/10

Originally Posted by Azazel005 (Post 787661)

I didn't know this had been adapted for film. I wasn't OVERLY fond of the story, but I did feel that it would led itself best to a more vivid and varied medium then graphic novel. Film would gain a greater advantage to manipulate fields of vision and use music, sound and voice. Sad that it doesn't sound like it came together.

Originally Posted by Roderick Usher (Post 787763)

The Exorcist III

I hadn't seen this one. I hated #2, so I didn't bother following up on the series, but I saw it used for $2.99 and couldn't resist. I was pleasantly surprised. A fun, fucked-up movie with a real knockout performance by George C Scott an lots of goergetown footage that made me a bit homesick.

7/10

Originally Posted by urgeok2 (Post 787766)

uncool man, like material possessions are a bummer. just another wall in your artifical cage, bro ... YOUR POSSESSIONS WILL OWN YOU !!!!!

:p

Originally Posted by urgeok2 (Post 787766)

uncool man, like material possessions are a bummer. just another wall in your artifical cage, bro ... YOUR POSSESSIONS WILL OWN YOU !!!!!

:p