Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Classic Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Last Seen 70s/80s Movie (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31568)

Elvis_Christ 02-03-2009 10:40 PM

You seen the original?

_____V_____ 02-03-2009 11:29 PM

Slumdog Millionaire.


Want me to be totally unbiased? Here we go...

After the 28 Days/Weeks duo, I did not expect this from Danny Boyle. He came across as a moviemaker who has a sensible approach and a no-nonsense way of filmmaking, and for him to make this is a bit incomprehensible. The very first word of the movie title itself portrays the country wrongly, and that goes with the mis-interpretation the West has always had of India - a country full of poverty, crime, slum dwellers, superstitions, orthodox beliefs, etc., when today's India is more or less an opposite.

Now the movie itself.

The performances of the two leads was about par, but the two superstars of the Indian movie industry were a bit flat. The concept of Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? was novel, but the execution and the questions itself were poorly done.

The music wasnt that great either, and why A R Rahman has got nominations for it is totally beyond me. He is a very talented music director, and has much, much better soundtracks under his belt than this one.

The only redeeming factor I noticed was the cinematography. Fine camerawork dots this flick from beginning to end.

Boyle's direction - considering the basic premise idea and the settings he should have taken into account, is mediocre. Being a Britisher, he should have had a much better view of modern India today, since the history of India and Great Britain has been so deeply linked. Any Indian viewer with a deep-rooted sense of patriotism would tear him to pieces, but I am being unbiased here, so I ll spare him.

Overall, it has a good beginning, but after the first 30 minutes, it goes down paths which viewers would already have seen many times before in crime/Mafia-esque type flicks. Considering the fact that it doesnt correctly portray the great nation as it is today, its another big minus on Slumdog's credentials. Roland Joffe faced the same problem when he made City of Joy in the early 90s with Patrick Swayze - he totally misinterpreted and misrepresented India and Indian culture, and faced a lot of flak for it.

Watch it, get entertained, but dont leave the theater with any post-conceived ideas from it. Erase it from your memories once you are done watching.

And dont even get me started on the Oscars and their credentials.



Rating - * *

fortunato 02-04-2009 12:09 AM

!

Yes, _V_. I completely agree.

A lot of it seemed to me like a cheap way to pull the viewer in emotionally, too.

Disease 02-04-2009 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fortunato (Post 786128)
????................

It was a double post.


Gran Torino

This movie really cracked me up.. angry old Clint Eastwood... :D

It is one of the better movies I've seen in a long time, even if the racist jokes to get abit old half way through.
It is a good story and it has a lot of heart.

8.5/10

The Mothman 02-04-2009 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _____V_____ (Post 786238)
Slumdog Millionaire.


Want me to be totally unbiased? Here we go...

After the 28 Days/Weeks duo, I did not expect this from Danny Boyle. He came across as a moviemaker who has a sensible approach and a no-nonsense way of filmmaking, and for him to make this is a bit incomprehensible. The very first word of the movie title itself portrays the country wrongly, and that goes with the mis-interpretation the West has always had of India - a country full of poverty, crime, slum dwellers, superstitions, orthodox beliefs, etc., when today's India is more or less an opposite.

Now the movie itself.

The performances of the two leads was about par, but the two superstars of the Indian movie industry were a bit flat. The concept of Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? was novel, but the execution and the questions itself were poorly done.

The music wasnt that great either, and why A R Rahman has got nominations for it is totally beyond me. He is a very talented music director, and has much, much better soundtracks under his belt than this one.

The only redeeming factor I noticed was the cinematography. Fine camerawork dots this flick from beginning to end.

Boyle's direction - considering the basic premise idea and the settings he should have taken into account, is mediocre. Being a Britisher, he should have had a much better view of modern India today, since the history of India and Great Britain has been so deeply linked. Any Indian viewer with a deep-rooted sense of patriotism would tear him to pieces, but I am being unbiased here, so I ll spare him.

Overall, it has a good beginning, but after the first 30 minutes, it goes down paths which viewers would already have seen many times before in crime/Mafia-esque type flicks. Considering the fact that it doesnt correctly portray the great nation as it is today, its another big minus on Slumdog's credentials. Roland Joffe faced the same problem when he made City of Joy in the early 90s with Patrick Swayze - he totally misinterpreted and misrepresented India and Indian culture, and faced a lot of flak for it.

Watch it, get entertained, but dont leave the theater with any post-conceived ideas from it. Erase it from your memories once you are done watching.

And dont even get me started on the Oscars and their credentials.



Rating - * *

glad to see im not the only one who thought it didn't live up to the hype.

The Mothman 02-04-2009 12:53 AM

Doubt
Revolutionary Road
both acting powerhouses, i enjoyed doubt a little bit more though.

urgeok2 02-04-2009 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Disease (Post 786117)
Unbrakeable

6/10



is that the one about the car that just wouldnt stop ? :D




last seen :

Taken.

enjoyable popcorn flick. nothing deep but a fast paced actioner that satisfied without insulting the intelligence (too much)

_____V_____ 02-04-2009 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fortunato (Post 786250)
!

Yes, _V_. I completely agree.

A lot of it seemed to me like a cheap way to pull the viewer in emotionally, too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mothman (Post 786260)
glad to see im not the only one who thought it didn't live up to the hype.

Bluntly put, this movie partly feeded off the world's sympathy and empathy for the Mumbai attacks in November '08. Anyone who knows India the way India is, would straightaway condemn this pic as being too cliched and grossly misrepresentative.

I dare say it might win the Oscar for the same reason above.

Too late, the damage has been done. People of the world continue to have a cock-eyed view of India, thanks to this flick and its immense popularity.

And too bad, because there are WAY better HINDI flicks than this one which never got the world's attention (because they werent released worldwide, and restricted to domestic BO), and which rightfully deserve an Oscar for Best Pic, in many more ways than one.

newb 02-04-2009 08:16 AM

Watched The Mothman Prophecies again last night. 7.5/10

good movie that could have been a bit better

Despare 02-04-2009 09:14 AM

Tokyo Gore Police - I really liked this one, there are some parts where they tried way too hard but the film held together. I can't wait for the sequel.


Battle Royale

Oh, and The Great Mouse Detective, there's one they won't be playing on The Disney Channel anytime soon.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:08 PM.