Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Upcoming Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Jeepers Creepers III: Cathedral (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=60730)

Posher778 03-02-2006 03:39 PM

yes, but I think all the Ginger Snaps movies were all equally good.

Yellow Jacket 03-02-2006 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Posher778
the third better... think about that really carefully... That's happened like 3 times in sequel history.
I meant the third being better than the second. And this has happened on a few occasions.

NOES 3
Friday the 13th part 3
Child's Play 3

Maybe not that many times, but JC 2 sucked so badly, that I don't see the third being any worse (I probably just jinxed it).

Posher778 03-02-2006 04:30 PM

The only I can think of is Scream 3

The_Return 03-02-2006 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by urgeok
god i hate it when they do that !!

the unknown is far more interesting ..
everyone always wants to know the origions .. the motives ...

that ruins things for me ...and takes time away from what i really want to see ...

I like a bit of explanation...not a full blown Pinhead style explanation, where you know everything and anything imaginable, but like they've done in the first two, give slight bits and pieces to help flesh out the character.

Agreed that they do need to keep some mystery to the Creeper, but Id like to be enlightened a bit.

urgeok 03-02-2006 06:58 PM

#2 was fucking great .. i loved it.

necer saw a 'monster' take such shit before ..
it had its ass kicked by everyone ..
loved the ending in the barn too.

Posher778 03-03-2006 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by urgeok
#2 was fucking great .. i loved it.

necer saw a 'monster' take such shit before ..
it had its ass kicked by everyone ..
loved the ending in the barn too.

The only scene I liked was when it was grinning and picking out people on the bus.

Zero 03-04-2006 07:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yellow Jacket
I loved the original, and is one of my favorites! The second sucked Zero's monkeyballs while fingering itself with old, crusty whipped cream! Hopefully, the third will be better.
ouch keep that thing off my balls.

personally i agree with the others - the first one was really good until the gargoyle rip-off thingy popped up and started flying around. . .second was pablum

oddly enough, i took a 'screenwriting class" for fun a few years back and did a 'treatment' for a jeepers creepers sequel - it was set up like Aliens and featured the sister from #1 many years later seeking out hte creeper for revenge - it was sort of stupid - though it had a twist ending that i'm still quite proud of

(so now i'll just wait for my phone to start ringing with the offers to write and direct!)

Yellow Jacket 03-04-2006 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Zero
ouch keep that thing off my balls.
I tried, but then it just tried suckind my balls (my stinger???)! So, I let it stick with yours.

BTW, I may be using some members names to insult (or praise) a movie. Not insulting anybody (since most of the names I'll be using are people that I like
), just thought it'd be a unique and entertaining way to express my opinions on movies. If anybody doesn't want there name used, just tell me.

kung-fu-jesus 03-07-2006 04:35 AM

1 was good. 2 was okay, and 3 could be good( depending on the story line and setting).

i personaly wouldnt mind seeing( first hand) what happened in the 70's, specificly what dairy and his sister were talking about( the couple that was in the car crash, and later found in the "house of pain"). that could be worth a watch. i wouldnt want to see a movie set in the 1800's or something.

crazy raplh 03-08-2006 09:18 PM

i say bring it. I loved the first two and an orgin would be nice. The first one freeked me out. and the secind was a good one to laugh at. maybe a dark one not so much corn yea know. lol

slasherman 03-08-2006 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yellow Jacket

Friday the 13th part 3
Child's Play 3

...it didnt happend on these occasions...

Scream 3
NOES 3 (like you said)
Hellraiser 3 (number 2 was to much)
Back to the future 3 ( not horror ...but)

...more to come

Yellow Jacket 03-09-2006 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by slasherman
...it didnt happend on these occasions...

Scream 3
NOES 3 (like you said)
Hellraiser 3 (number 2 was to much)
Back to the future 3 ( not horror ...but)

...more to come

I was just going by what I personally thought of the movies. Though, I may be taking Child's Play 3 off of my list since I seem to enjoy watching part 2 a helluva lot more. Each time I watch it I'm seldomy entertain and I always find something to keep me interested each watch. Child's Play 3 is starting to get stale. I still like it, but just not as much as I seem to be likeing part 2. FACTOID: Both Child's Play 2 and Child's Play 3 have received 3 out of 5 stars.

persuasian70 03-09-2006 09:31 PM

I really enjoyed the first half of JC #1, but then it kept on getting worse and worse. The kids were dumb as hell (we just saw a guy dump what looks like bodies into a hole, let's go back and check it out). Then he sprouted wings and then the movie ended so abruptly. It started off sooo promising. I have to say that the second was at least not disappointing. I knew going in what I was going to see. If a #3 comes out, I will definitely wait for it to come out on DVD, if it doesn't go staight to video.

bwind22 08-23-2006 11:22 PM

Jeepers Creepers 3 ????
 
Okay, I'm perplexed.... What the hell is this?

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...320sodeb34.jpg


Did someone just photoshop their own JC3 DVD or is this film already out in Europe?

Phalanx 08-24-2006 06:18 AM

No info on imdb, minimal info turned up through searching, the main message was that production started and was suspended due to funding issues...

bwind22 08-24-2006 06:21 AM

Hmpf! Weird.....



I wonder this picture came from then. Maybe a promotional thing for the marketing department or something....


If anything on this is accurate, (Not sure if it is completely made up or what...) I think it would be interesting to see a female Creeper.

joshaube 08-24-2006 07:26 AM

The cover itself is very obviously done by someone in photoshop, without much know-how of the program. It's a rather shitty cover, and no studio would EVER approve it. Half of the things on it don't even make sense, or are just plain stupid.

I'd be willing to say that the front image is not from the film either. It looks sort of drawn, and not that greatly designed for a creeper.

urgeok 08-24-2006 07:36 AM

although i guess there is a practical reason for it (honing the photoshop skills - and exposure for your abilities) the new fanboy fad of creating your own made up posters (and trailers) - makes you wonder sometimes why they just dont channel their imagination and talents into making the actual goddamn film.

The_Return 08-24-2006 08:29 AM

Another giveaway clue:

Look in the bottom left hand corner of what would be the front cover.

"Un film de sodeh-34" (Should be "par", not "de")

Translated:

"A film of sodeh-34"

Hmm...cant think of many directors that go by a screenname:rolleyes:

Burning in Hell 08-24-2006 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Return
Another giveaway clue:

Look in the bottom left hand corner of what would be the front cover.

"Un film de sodeh-34" (Should be "par", not "de")

Translated:

"A film of sodeh-34"

Hmm...cant think of many directors that go by a screenname:rolleyes:

Sorry to rain on your parade, but the the mention is correct by all means.

"A film by" translates into "Un film de" in French, while "Filmed by" would translate into "Filmé par". "Un film par" would not be correct under any circumstance. And I certainly know what I am talking about, since I am French (or French-Canadian if you prefer), AND a translator.

Now, the guy's name, well that is quite another story :D

paws the great 08-24-2006 02:21 PM

The cover looks alot like Return of the Living Dead 3.
The girl even looks like Mindy Clarke.

Burning in Hell 08-24-2006 02:27 PM

Yeah, I thought about ROTLD 3 too...

Phalanx 08-24-2006 03:40 PM

Nah that rotld3 bitch was WAY hotter...

VampiricClown 08-24-2006 04:07 PM

This is what I came across awhile back that made me post the thread about Jeepers Creepers 3. The front looks good, the back looks bad.

It's not real.

newb 08-24-2006 04:12 PM

Its obviously not real........they even stuck a pic of Max van Sydow's, Father Merrin on there.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001884/

VampiricClown 08-24-2006 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by newb
Its obviously not real........they even stuck a pic of Max van Sydow's, Father Merrin on there.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001884/

Haha, nice.

The_Return 08-24-2006 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Burning in Hell
Sorry to rain on your parade, but the the mention is correct by all means.

"A film by" translates into "Un film de" in French, while "Filmed by" would translate into "Filmé par". "Un film par" would not be correct under any circumstance. And I certainly know what I am talking about, since I am French (or French-Canadian if you prefer), AND a translator.

Now, the guy's name, well that is quite another story :D

Well thats what I get for dropping out of French at school:o :o

Korpse 08-24-2006 07:12 PM

http://www.channel4.com/entertainmen...gallery_13.jpg

halloweenfreak1 08-27-2006 05:28 PM

Re: Jeepers Creepers 3 ????
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bwind22
Okay, I'm perplexed.... What the hell is this?

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y12...320sodeb34.jpg


Did someone just photoshop their own JC3 DVD or is this film already out in Europe?

please God no not another one.

VampiricClown 08-27-2006 05:52 PM

Re: Re: Jeepers Creepers 3 ????
 
Quote:

Originally posted by halloweenfreak1
please God no not another one.
The first one was good, hated the second though. Too fratboy-ish.

The_Return 08-27-2006 06:11 PM

The first is one of my personal favourite films, and the second was decent too IMO. I would definatly like to see a third.

halloweenfreak1 08-30-2006 04:05 PM

Re: Re: Re: Jeepers Creepers 3 ????
 
Quote:

Originally posted by VampiricClown
The first one was good, hated the second though. Too fratboy-ish.
the second one was so horrible it almost made the first on look bad.

bloodrayne 05-07-2007 05:53 PM

Looks like it's actually happening

http://www.themovieinsider.com/m2297...rs-creepers-3/

But...It still seems kinda tentative...

the_real_linda 05-08-2007 11:12 AM

why? the first one has grown on me but the second.......i mean are we meant to not want the football players and cheerleaders on the school bus to die???

jenna26 05-08-2007 12:05 PM

I watched the first one, and it was amusing. I have yet to see the second one, though I am sure I will eventually. Same goes for the third one if it comes about, I would probably see it eventually.

Liar,liar 01-11-2008 01:26 PM

Jeepers Creepers 3
 
I hope its half descent.

http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10337

Zero 01-13-2008 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liar,liar (Post 659131)

agreed - if its half as good as THE DESCENT it will be pretty decent.

Liar,liar 01-13-2008 08:48 AM

Yeah The Descent was good and The Descent 2 is supposed to be coming out this year also.

VampiricClown 01-13-2008 09:07 AM

I liked the original, the second sucked.

And I didn't like The Descent. So I'm not looking forward to that sequel.

bigaza 01-13-2008 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liar,liar (Post 659346)
Yeah The Descent was good and The Descent 2 is supposed to be coming out this year also.

how the f**k can you do a sequel to the descent?! their gonna ruin it!!!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:55 PM.