you forgot that the one chick got her spine severed.

but i thought it was a great film, the fact the thing really happend( not exactly the same but close) didnt hurt.

but i think the best part was the old auzi, in my opinion was one of the best horror heavys( really creepy sadistic fuck) in the last 10-15 years easy

You and I are the only people on this board that think that!:D

nothing happens for 40 minutes.....theres way too much shots of the desert and sun...and vultures....high tension was decent....but blew this dogshit away....aussies aren't scary.

tarantion too

have you ever been to australia, its nothing but crazy people, a few citys, and an ass load of desert wasteland ful of fucking animals.

"wolf creek" was boring and lame. i was very disappointed because it got all this hype and ended up being an awful waste of an hour and a half.



Suggestion: instead of seeing this movie, rent "boggy creek 2" just as terrible, but less expensive.

this was deff. the biggest waste of 8 bucks. its a good movie to put you asleep though :)

SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooo Bad!!!!


Watch it if you really want to waste a few hours of your life but its really pants!!

I was going to rent this movie but after reading a few of these reviews, Im gonna save my 4 bucks and skip this movie and just wait for Hostel next week. I guess Wolf Creek was really bad.

I didn't think it was all that bad... at least it was more realistic than most horror movies.

Well, I picked up this movie out of bordemn. I had very low expectations for this movie because of these reviews. It was ok and better than I thought. The first half of the movie was so damn slow and boring. It was a waste of time and it was like the director just wanted to kill some time. Then it picked up and built a little suspense. The ending was abrupt and lame. Its worth a rent I think but its no where near to "The Hills have Eyes" remake. I think this movie and Hostel fall short and both could have been better.

It definetly took a while before anything happened, but once it did, it became alot better. I think the Australian Psycho was a refreshing change, but they could have taken it a lot further then they did.

I thought the movie was terrible. I had hope at the beginning because the one girl seemed smart and there would a cat and mouse thing going, but somewhere she got really dumb and it ruined it for me. I have some questions to ask about the movie?
Don't read on if you haven't seen it and want to see it.


Why did the killer tie up the girl's hands in front of her body? If I want to tie up someone, I would tie their hands behind their back.

If you had a killer, who was going to torture and rape your best friend, passed out in front of you. Would you:

a. Bash his head in with the butt of the rifle.
b. Reload the rifle and shoot him in the head.
c. Grab one of the other guns on the table and shoot him with it.
d. Hit him in the back a couple of times with the stock of the rifle.



If you guessed d you win the idot award.

Anyone know why she climbed down the pit. Did she think she would find a car down there?

At any point did she even think about looking for the guy. She really forgot about him really quick. And why the hell did it take him so much longer to wake up?

How the hell did the killer know which car she would get into? Was he a psychic serial killer? There were like four or five cars.

Whatever happened to the handgun she found and took the time to find bullets for?

Just a few questions, I have more but I thought these were enough. The movie was a bore, and I hate any movie where the victims act so idiotic.

Well supposedly all that shit really happened so I guess you can chalk it up to standard human stupidity. But yeah, the movie sucked dick.