Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. - how do i think them up????

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)

- Classic Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=8)

- - how do i think them up???? (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=53034)

Paranormal Activity cost $15,000 and has an estimated total domestic gross of $103,847,000.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Despare (Post 837111)

Paranormal Activity cost $15,000 and has an estimated total domestic gross of $103,847,000.

God bless hype...

I think Blair witch cost about $60k.

But as I showed Remakes do in general make as much if not more then 'original films'

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elvis_Christ (Post 837089)

Yo neilold you should remake Final Destination

:D Yep, or....I Know What You Did Last Summer. That would be so killer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by illdojo (Post 837120)

:D Yep, or....I Know What You Did Last Summer. That would be so killer.

And by "be so" you mean "involve a" right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferox13 (Post 837090)

I would guess almost every single remake made cash..

When a Stranger Calls cost $15m made $41m

The RIng cost $48m made $129m

The Grudge cost $10m made $110m

Prom Night cost $18m made $48m

The Texas Chainsaw Massacre cost $9.2m made $80m

The Amityville Horror cost $19m made $65m

Friday the 13th cost $16m made $65m

Thirteen Ghosts cost $20m made $41m

The Omen cost $25m made $54m

My Bloody Valentine cost $25m made $51m

Dawn of the Dead cost $28m made $58m

Halloween cost $20m made $58m

These figure are what they made in US CINEMAS ONLY - so they also made more cash from the foreign market and DVD sales too.

So i'm not really sure where you're getting the idea that they're making 'Not too much bank'.. Remakes are a safe bet and consistantly make money - I don't understand your point that 'they don't encourage repeat business from even casual gorehounds'.

To put it in perspective heres the American Gross' for some 'original script/non-remake' horror:

The Mist cost $13m(?) made $25m

Land of the Dead cost $15m made $21m

30 Days of Night cost $32m made $39m

I am Legend cost €150m made $256m

1408 cost €25m made €71m

28 days Later cost $9.8m made $45m

I hate to requote this whole passage b/c it is quite lengthy, but I do have to wonder why anybody would say "Yeah, remakes don't make money" when it takes so little internet research to see that they do make a LOT of money. That's why they make them. Even after you say things like they only "alienate" people, the sequel to Halloween is currently sitting at $40 million in worldwide box, and it's budget was $15 million.....$25 million profit before even hitting video shelves is a lot of cash to pass up for something that can be produced quickly, can star anybody, and doesn't have to have any real advertising money behind it...

Another great quote from Ferox13:

Quote:

And what fans are they alienating - ppl like us. I would imagine we are a tiny fraction of the cinema going audience that go to see these films. I bet if u asked every person who saw the Prom Night remake who directed the original i would say a fraction of 1% would know. The remakes are not made for nerd fans who collect films from the 2nd unit director of Street Trash.

True dat.

I had been looking at the Prom Night and Hitcher remakes as examples, who both put in weak showings. Also, I was pointing out that it's not a good idea for a new writer to query with a remake script. It's like sending an agent a script for a Superman project. They have people to write those. Workhorse whore writers who can churn out scripts quickly. Sending an agent or studio a remake script is not going to get you into the movie industry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doc Faustus (Post 837310)

Workhorse whore writers who can churn out scripts quickly. Sending an agent or studio a remake script is not going to get you into the movie industry.

heh-heh....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doc Faustus (Post 837310)

I had been looking at the Prom Night and Hitcher remakes as examples, who both put in weak showings.

The Hitcher indeed did very badly - Prom Night did make some money in the US cinemas and wikipedia has it as a worldwide total of $56,597,560 (I'm not sure if this is DVD sales too I'd say so) which is a lot of profit on a $18m budget.

So The Hitcher was definally a failure the majority of remakes seem to make significant 'bank' - and of course this is the reason they are being churned out..

As for you point of a new writer starting tihe a script for a remake or exisiting francise I never criticised - you're right. Its not how hollywood works on these things.

Quote:

Workhorse whore writers who can churn out scripts quickly. Sending an agent or studio a remake script is not going to get you into the movie industry.

I have a tendency to blame directors over writers... I've seen some stupidly written films amaze me with cinematography...

Case and point:
City of Lost Children
--and--
Killing Zoe

I don't blame the writers for shitty scripts. I blame the people who give them crappy assignments and an intellectual environment that makes it nearly impossible to live on genuine creativity.