Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   News, Reviews & Article Discussions (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Dawn of the Dead 2004 - Exclusive Coverage (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4773)

zombiefoker 05-06-2004 12:17 AM

are you really serious?
 
The movie sucks, and its not horror, i prefer to call it comedy. The characters act like stupid kids and do really wierd things. Ans the actors suck, the only good one is Rhames.

massacre man 05-06-2004 01:01 PM

thats just ur opinion

pheifer should have survived


thats my own opinion

jeremy 05-20-2004 12:48 PM

dawn of the dead
 
the best movie ever it was cool i think they should make day of the dead also.......

scaryminda15 12-17-2005 11:05 AM

dawn of the dead
 
HOW MANY TIMES CAN I SAY AWESOME MAN THIS MOVIE ROCKED IT WAS SO GREAT APPAULSE FOR THE WHOLE CREW ON THAT MOVIE

Pinheadache 05-26-2006 12:50 PM

Dawn of the dead
 
To be honest, I didn't quite "get" the first one, much less the remake. It seems to me that "horror" comes from "threat", and on this movie, humans were on top the whole time. Every death seemed like a cause of stupidity. To me Dawn of the dead was nothing more than "eye candy".
Zombies were meant to be scarry, not dumb.

I would'nt mind having a shotgun and helping myself to some "target practice" with some slow ass zombies.

scumfuck 01-24-2007 11:30 AM

Good joke
 
I expected so much more from George A. Romero, before the movie was released he went out and said that this movie is to show everyone how zombie movies should be made. Did anyone else notice all the flaws:
A) In the script
B) How zombies were able to "think"
C) In the way that the zombies were able to survive under water
Can anyone give me some insight towards all this. Maybe that might help me understand the movie and I might not think it sucks so much.

bloodrayne 01-24-2007 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scumfuck (Post 539010)
I expected so much more from George A. Romero, before the movie was released he went out and said that this movie is to show everyone how zombie movies should be made. Did anyone else notice all the flaws:
A) In the script
B) How zombies were able to "think"
C) In the way that the zombies were able to survive under water
Can anyone give me some insight towards all this. Maybe that might help me understand the movie and I might not think it sucks so much.

About the script...I don't have a comment for that one...I thought it was fine (of course, it's been a while now since I watched this one...I have seen literally hundreds of horror movies since I watched this...I'm sure that I don't remember every detail...I DO remember thinking that some of the key characters did some really stupid things...).

As for 'thinking'...They were human, and in many zombie movies, they retain much of the habits and routines from their former lives (as in the original Dawn Of The Dead)...It may also have to do with instinct...They need to feed, they have to find a way to do that...Even animals can 'think' enough to be able to obtain what they need

The underwater thing is a given...No one questioned it in Fulci's 'Zombie'...They're DEAD...They don't exactly need to breathe...

davidd60 01-24-2007 12:37 PM

this is a good movie


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:05 AM.