![]() |
Maybe it wasn't special to people who watch lots of similar movies, but I liked the first one.
No, it wasn't racist. The bad guys were international, including an american. |
Quote:
So it's baldist and fattist. bwahahaha |
Apart from the political critique, I think both Hostel movies have a deep sociological meaning to them. They make a satire out of capitalism, saying that everything has a price, everything is allowed as long as you have enough money to cover it. The question "would you kill someone if you knew you'd never get caught and had someone to clean up your mess" is also an good one. I think these movies brought up a lot of interesting questions and that's what made me enjoy them.
However... I didn't like the first movie, thought the idea was great but it was poorly executed, too many titties! The second didn't have that part and the message was much clearer, so I really liked it. |
i didnt like hostel. i get the commentary, but honestly, i think Eli just likes tits, a LOT (cant fault the man for that, though)
The last little bit was great, but my ultimate disappointment was because i was under the impression the entire movie was supposed to be torture and blood. by the time we got to it, i was annoyed and the impact was lost. I would enjoy something that was the same basic idea, but unapologeticly brutal from start to finish. Wolf Creek was better, imo. |
Quote:
I was honestly disappointed with the film... I just wanted significantly... more, especially after the attention that the film got. AND, I agree with Vod, even though Wolf Creek as a whole wasn't that great a movie, I thought it was more brutal than Hostel. |
Quote:
|
he might have wanted to make a social statement with the movie, but I think he failed badly, whats wrong in just making a really gory horror, why do these film makers try and make their work more than that?
|
I understand, and can even appreciate, what Roth was trying to do with Hostel. Unfortunately, as others have said, he failed. It was clumsy, and not all that effective. The last few minutes was pretty damn good, the first half was sex over substance. He took on too much, he is just not a good enough filmmaker to make the film I think he honestly wanted to make. He aimed too high. I actually prefer Cabin Fever, because it was just goofy fun. It wasn't really trying to be anything other than that. I much prefer to watch a movie that aims low, and at least kind of hits the mark than to watch a film that aims high and so completely misses the mark.
I felt the same way about Saw and High Tension (and Wolf Creek actually, which I found to be just BORING as hell), all movies where the people involved seemed to think the film was more clever, or better, than it actually was. Well, in my opinion anyway. |
Quote:
I agree absolutely with every point here, even with Cabin Fever - I thought that this little film was great because he didn't have any sort of higher agenda. It was cheesy, yes, but I thought it worked significantly better than Hostel. I also agree with Saw (though for IRONIC AMUSEMENT, it's absolutely GOLD to see Carey Elwese trying to pull off an American accent), High Tension (which was predictable and DISAPPOINTING) and Wolf Creek (though I liked it better than Hostel, I thought that the blood and killings should have come much much sooner. |
Quote:
I do believe Hostel was over hyped though. The gore wasn't really all that gory but I still thought it was fun to watch and I got a few laughs from it. The bubblegum gang killing the thugs, the girls getting run over, Edward salad hands, The Asian girl's eyegasm. It wasn't the greatest movie ever but I don't watch horror expecting something of Oscar caliber quality. I watch them because they are fun. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:52 AM. |