i loved the film and at first i thought there should be connections to fd2 but in fd2 it was connected to fd so its logical that fd3 links back to fd but it would have been cool. plus its cool that it has worked really well as 3 film thus far instead of one x-files episode which it would have been. so go glen and james!

just a side note, in our morning newspaper it had a pic of erin with the nails through her face...i though that was a bit disturbing for people reading a paper in the morning on there way to work...especially if little kids saw it....bless....and it was more clasic that it went back to highschool kids....but they were my my age group like in the first film so we all wigged out about that



hey i just found this

"The truck that backs into them at the drive-through is the same "drink responsibly" truck in the opening scene of Final Destination 2 (2003)."




"Tony Todd, who played the mortician in the first two films, provides the voice of the devil above the entrance to the roller coaster. He also provides the speaker's voice saying, "This is the end of the line" in the subway towards the end of the movie."

and this to fd

"# The song played during Ashley and Ashlyn's funeral is the same song played during the memorial service of Flight 180 in Final Destination (2000)."

the freeway crash scene in FD# was worthy of any high budget mainstream film.
incredibly tight, extremely well edited .. it all flowed logically.

It was the ultimate rube goldberg sequence - the biggest and most amazing one of all 3 films.

it did catch my breath...it all flowed perfectly and you saw it all coming because of that it was nothing you could do which made youfeel helpless watching it. twas cool

2 > 1 > 3.

3 was average, nothing really memorable unlike the 2nd and to some extent, the 1st.

the first has always got to be up at the top......never seen anything like that b4.....and we know what to expect with the other two.

i saw final destination 3 it was alright. the gore was decent enough. but the story line was boring especially since it was th4e exact same as the first to except it involved a roller coaster.

Great crash in number two, as mentioned, but I think the overkill of CGI in the third one finally ran the franchise out of steam. And warning signs were there in the previous movie, where the main attraction was the anticipation of the next outrageous, improbable case of death rather than wonder about the construction of it all.

i enjoyed it.

I enjoyed the third too, but not as much as the second.

Nah Final D 3 was the same plot outline as final D 1 just with new characters i prefer the 1st one as it was an orginal plot line the 3rd one was just an attempt to make money:rolleyes: