28 DAYS IS A ZOMBIE MOVIE IT SAYS IT IN THE ADVERTISMENTS.

AND BY THE WAY I THOUGHT IT WAS A OK MOVIE STARTED OUT WEAK THEN HE FOUND THOSE TWO GOT GOOD UNTIL THEY GOT INTO THE APARTMENT WITH THE MAN AND GIRL,THEN IT WAS WEAK UNTILE THEY GOT TO THE BASE THEN IT WAS OK UNTIL THE PART WHERE THAT SICK SON OF A BITCH MAJOR TOLD JIM HIS PLANS FOR THE GIRLS,THEN IT GOT GOOD WHEN JIM GOT BACK TO THE BASE AGAIN.

THAT'S THE KIND OF MOVIE IT WAS ON AND OFF.

Completely agree with you. Not the living dead. WERE NOT dead. Were INFECTED. And if you are going by your second definition of "zombie" they were not mechanical or apathetic. They were highly animated and HATED the uninfected. So they do clearly care about something: spreading their disease.

trust me if u read about the 100 other threads about this movie u will c in every1 i said i hated it and walked out of it half way through

can someone give me the plot of this movie? i have been wenting to see it but i need to know more about it before i rent it.




"If you learn to conquer your fears, you will often be able to preform things that you would have previously regarded as impossible." -Sir Edmund Hillary, first to summit Everast.

for starters its been asked before but youv never answered i belive...WHY THE FUCK DO YOU KEEP TYPING WITH THE FUCKING CAPS ON!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!? its anoying, personaly all i want to do when i see piss like that is to smash that persons hands with his keyboard wether its conan or ms. daisy!!! WHY FOR THE LOVE OF GOD WHY!?

now that i got that out of my system...they were zombie like... no doubt, mindless people infected with some little experiment, the reviewers called it a zombie movie not the producers or publishers. and if you want a movie with all action and no story its time to rent a sleezy porn. imo character development and story telling is important to, i enjoyed hearing the story that the guy who got his arm chopped off told, it was a laugh seing them run amoch in the story... every element of that movie had a story to tell no matter how small.... in short.... yes.

28 DAYS LATER
 

I'm a big fan. Loved 28 DAYS LATER.

Was it a tad overrated? Yeah, probably. Was it original? No, it wasn't the most original movie in the world. But was it scary? IMO that's a huge, resounding YES!

I love movies propelled by a horror that could conceivably *really happen*. To me, that's the scariest kind of horror movie of all . . . .


Believe it or not, some of my favorite scenes were the "quieter" ones, though. The scenes of Jim wondering a lonely, desolate city. Totally *alone*.


Great stuff. I bought it the day it came out.


Oh, yeah . . . and I totally agree about the ALL-CAPS thing. :)




J.N.
http://members.tripod.com/~NEWMANATOR/index.html

I was extremely let down by this film. It was tedious depressing and not scary! a typical British arty attempt at doing horror,something we haven't managed to do since the demise of the hammer studios.

i remember some of the ads talking about them being zombies, and before the movie came out, a lot of the people who told me about the movie coming out thought it was a zombie movie too...i always thought that was what it was before i saw it

2 minutes later: still laughing at that lol

and sig'd haha

C'mon now....maybe his caps lock key is broken... :D