PR3SSUR3 |
11-20-2005 08:45 AM |
Quote:
I totally disagree. I think that was the whole point of the film. They're lost under a bloody mountain with no navigating equipment. The audience is supposed to feel as disorientated as the characters. I thought the shocks were no way near as predictable as the shocks in the other crappy films that are churned out now-days. My opinion is that the film is so full of shocking moments that you never have any time to relax properly between them - this is what made it a good film for me. Had no probs with the ending myself. Parts of it were very similar to other horrors but I thought it was a good ending.
Also, i think Dog Soldiers is a great movie and no-way over-rated. Its not really meant to be a serious horror is it??? Its kind of a satire. And if you do take it to be serious then of course your gonna find problems with it. Its also very popular in the UK and I dont think thats because we all love the 'quaint' accents. In my opinion, it makes me happy to see a british horror do so well on the other side of the pond.
|
OK, but compare this to the cavernous corridors and up/down shafts in the Aliens series for example - in these films the protagonists are also pursued by murderous creatures around badly lit, tight spaces... but the viewer is given more sense of direction - if not orientation - as to where they are heading.
The scenes in The Descent did not really allow for any wider, establishing shots (granted, because they are trying to negotiate such tight spaces) but this just leads us directly from one darkened small area to the next... becoming a bit boring and diluting the suspense.
Dog Soldiers isn't bad, but the comedy-werewolf thing has been done much better, as has the night-time siege-on-the-old-house scenario.
|