..dont think so...

The Exorcist about every movie that do demons taken over people is ripping off the Exorcist in how they do it. I hate the last exorcist movie only the 1rst was better. How about the Thing (John Carpenter) now that had good makeup. When Kurt Russell lived in springfield, Ma my family knew them, but he was like 5 years old and they moved away. kurt russell will never say he was born in springfield. lol

FX over CGI anyday a lot of that stuff in LOTD looked exactly what it was cheap CGI. And how come no ones mentioned Rob Bottin?

I like CGI in pretty much anything but horror movies.

When it comes to horror, everything needs to be as realistic looking as possible in order to make it seem real.

P.S. Why the hell is this in 'Upcoming'?

Cuz CGI is still "up and coming".

I got nothin'.

I prefer practical F/X/make-up most of the time. CG has its place for things that could not be done any other way. I find the mix of the two to be the best. A pracitical creature replaced with CGI when it is climbing or running, but they have to match. Too often they try to build CG models with no real world reference. The T-rex in Jurrassic Park still amazes me. Why has CGI gotten worse?

I have voted for CGI.

I think that CGI is especially effective in hardcore porn films.:D