Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Classic Horror Movies (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   friday the 13th top 5 (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18376)

RavageRitual 01-08-2006 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Posher778
wow... and i thought you would be the one to bash about what i said...



tres cool:cool:

Shut Up, Im the basher remember?

crazy raplh 01-08-2006 11:04 PM

I don't know I liked them all. I would consider them to be classics.

cheebacheeba 01-09-2006 01:25 AM

The first one was excellent, nice kills, better suspenseful atmosphere than the sequels, nice camera work, and lets face it, if you didnt know about the twist, it was pretty kick-ass.

To be honest, I don't really like many of them at all...
I seem to remember one about a bunch of teens that were harassed by bikers at some point, that was "ok", but just ok.

Jason goes to hell, IMO, was a welcome change. I enjoyed it, and to this day, it's one of my favourite Jason movies, whether or not it's part of the "series".

F vs J was "ok", but overall FAR more a Freddy movie than a Jason movie, in terms of score, atmosphere, and storyline.

AmericanManiac 01-09-2006 08:05 AM

I have to agree with the sleeping bag kill *shivers* I still won't get into a sleeping bag to this day and i'm all grown up, when I first seen that I was terrified and didn't sleep for days.

kung-fu-jesus 01-09-2006 12:14 PM

you people are so fucking off topic, the thread is for friday the 13th kills not how bad the movies sucked( and a few really did).

MichaelMyers 01-09-2006 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kung-fu-jesus
you people are so fucking off topic, the thread is for friday the 13th kills not how bad the movies sucked( and a few really did).
Here's a little secret that Starbucks doesn't want you to know: They will serve you a better, stronger cappuccino if you want one, and they will charge you less for it. Ask for it in any Starbucks and the barista will comply without batting an eye. The puzzle is to work out why.

The drink in question is the elusive "short cappuccino"—at 8 ounces, a third smaller than the smallest size on the official menu, the "tall," and dwarfed by what Starbucks calls the "customer-preferred" size, the "Venti," which weighs in at 20 ounces and more than 200 calories before you add the sugar.

The short cappuccino has the same amount of espresso as the 12-ounce tall (twice the size of an extra large m.ooncup), meaning a bolder coffee taste, and also a better one. The World Barista Championship rules, for example, define a traditional cappuccino as a "five- to six-ounce beverage." This is also the size of cappuccino served by many continental cafés. Within reason, the shorter the cappuccino, the better.

The_Return 01-09-2006 12:37 PM

Im not a big cappuccino fan, myself. Although in the summer, Ice Caps are AMAZING.

MichaelMyers 01-09-2006 01:12 PM

:: spills coffee all over Returner ::

Posher778 01-09-2006 04:13 PM

does anyone love pie? I LOVE PIE


where am i...?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:36 PM.