Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror.

Horror.com Forums - Talk about horror. (https://www.horror.com/forum/index.php)
-   Horror.com General Forum (https://www.horror.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   What does the MPAA consider "bloody" (https://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10467)

mothermold 10-03-2004 10:36 PM

..the mpaa got more rules and guidelines than a beach got sand.i recall an article from "gorezone" titled the golden age of gore 1978 to 1984(or 83)highlighting the goodies in that magic window..prior to the mpaa's crackdown.it was'nt blood so much(pooled or splattered)as it was running or flowing...they had an "issue" with that.

Steve_Hutchison 10-04-2004 02:05 AM

Was the violence in Passion of the Christ really necessary? The MPAA sure thought so.

jay o2 waster 10-04-2004 04:42 AM

period blood

jay o2 waster 10-04-2004 04:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Steve_Hutchison
Was the violence in Passion of the Christ really necessary? The MPAA sure thought so.
if it had been any body else up on that cross it would have been rated NC-17

pbenvin 10-04-2004 04:57 AM

As someone said before, it's the red that they have issue with. Notice how in Kill Bill Vol.1, when that huge fight took place, the movie went from color to black and white. That's so Tarantino could leave all of the violence and bloodshed in without getting an NC-17, or having to edit the shit out of it. After the gore was over, the movie flipped back to color.

Steve_Hutchison 10-04-2004 05:35 AM

I don't think I'd have a problem with zombies bleeding black in a dark setting.

Arioch 10-04-2004 06:43 AM

Quote:

Was the violence in Passion of the Christ really necessary? The MPAA sure thought so
The REAL point of the thread....and the MPAA's true motivation and source of biased ratings emerges.....


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 PM.