|
B
|
A
|
Quote:
But I don't create them just Post them. sorry. It's not as easy as it looks, lol.;) I spend hours and hours getting good scans and stuff and it is hard to please everybody. B leads 5-3 Quote:
I used the tags from Subspecies II and forgot to change the date.lol. |
Quote:
I vote for B. Side note: I kind of feel like both of these Dracula movies are underrated. People knock them just because they don't fit Bram Stoker's version of Dracula (Granted, he did invent the character, but still...) When i envision a vampire. I envision a savage, brutally violent, demon of the night that spends all of his time searching for warm blood. I thought these two movies captured that pretty well. I thought they made the Dracula character as 'badass' as I was hoping he would be when I went and saw Bram Stoker's Dracula. (Interview With A Vampire also would have benefitted, in my opinion, from more savage vampires. I just hate seeing such wicked characters turned in to some quivering pansy because he's smitten with a girl or some lame shit like that.) If you are going to make a vampire movie, make it right. Make it violent. Make them bloodthirsty. And make them unrepentant. Okay, I've rambled enough. I vote for poster B. |
A
|
Quote:
IMO, that's a true Vampire, Nosferatu is also what I would Vision as well. |
DRACULA II WINS
ROUND TWO MATCHUP # 1 THE BATTLE OF VAMPIRE MOVIE POSTERS VAN HELSING (2004) (US THEATRICAL TEASER BANNER) http://img20.photobucket.com/albums/...POSTER_VAN.jpg VS. JOHN CARPENTER'S VAMPIRES (1998) (US THEATRICAL STYLE A) http://img18.photobucket.com/albums/...R_VAMPIRES.jpg .................................................. .............................. |
A - of course I can't wait for that movie o.o.
|
van helsing
|
John Carpenter's Vampires
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:40 PM. |