Log in

View Full Version : Mother Who Dropped Baby From Bridge Sues Bridge Operators


bloodrayne
08-26-2004, 07:52 PM
Mother Whose Baby Fell Is Hurting, Court Told
Can't hold jobs in T.O., lawyers say

She Dropped Baby Into B.C. Gorge

VANCOUVER—Nadia Hama, who dropped her infant daughter from the Capilano Suspension Bridge nearly five years ago, is pressing ahead with a suit against the operators of the privately owned tourist attraction.

Hama cannot hold a job in Toronto and suffers ongoing emotional stress because of the negative publicity still surrounding her case, her lawyer says.

Persistent notoriety chased her to Toronto, where she relocated in 2001, shortly after launching the suit, lawyer Neil Searles said Monday after a hearing in B.C. Supreme Court into the merits of Nadia Hama vs. Capilano Suspension Bridge and Park.

"When people find out who she is, suddenly, they don't need her anymore," said Searles, one of three Toronto lawyers representing Hama in her suit.

Hama is seeking general, special and punitive damages against the bridge operators for nervous shock, mental and emotional stress and costs.

Hama blames the operators for the 1999 bridge incident that garnered international media attention, when North Vancouver RCMP suggested she be charged in the case.

She claims she stumbled accidentally and the child slipped from her grasp, tumbling over the narrow footbridge's low railing.

Her daughter Kaya, then 17 months, miraculously survived the plunge after tree branches broke her 70-metre fall .

Hama was never charged but an acrimonious divorce followed.

Her former husband, North Vancouver securities lawyer Kjeld Werbes, has custody of Kaya and their son Jovan, who was 4 at the time. During divorce proceedings, Werbes claimed Hama deliberately dropped Kaya, who has Down syndrome, off the bridge.

Now an occasional Toronto hairdresser and esthetician, Hama, 43, visits her children in Vancouver several times a year, according to court documents.

Hama, who was not in court, reportedly suffers flashbacks, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. According to court files, she fears the future and the media.

Hama launched suit against Capilano Suspension Bridge Holdings Ltd. in September, 2001, claiming it was negligent in failing to warn the public not to carry children across the narrow bridge that is ``inherently unstable and dangerous" and that signs should be posted warning visitors to watch their step on the swaying bridge.

Company lawyers asked for the case — due for jury trial, Nov. 15 — to be dismissed on the grounds Hama was solely responsible

bloodrayne
08-26-2004, 08:14 PM
Another spectacular example of someone refusing to take responsibility for their own actions...Granted, it was an 'accident', but it was HER accident, not the bridge operators'....

Now she is suing because SHE is still having problems with it...Her baby is fine, but SHE isn't...

Maybe I would have a bit more respect for her if she were seeking damages for the pain and trauma inflicted upon her child (which I feel SHE is responsible for), instead of the supposed pain and suffering inflicted upon herself...Seems a bit selfish to me...

It took her 5 YEARS to realize that this was a traumatic event?:rolleyes:

I don't know...Something about this entire story just pisses me off...Perhaps, it's because she said there should have been signs posted about not carrying a child across the bridge, because it was dangerous and it swayed...If I were carrying MY baby across a rickety bridge that was "swaying", above a deep gorge (first of all, I'm not sure that I would even feel safe doing that to begin with...But, that's just me)...I would have had a death grip on that baby for fear that I might drop her...You wouldn't have been able to PRY that baby from my arms, much less would I just trip and drop her into a gorge...Maybe I'm just overreacting, but apparently her husband had similar views, and he was there, so he saw what happened...Anyway...Overeacting or not...It STILL pisses me off...She should just be forever grateful that her child is not DEAD, instead of whining about how she can't deal with it, FIVE YEARS later:rolleyes:

BTW...I wonder how the people at every job she goes to finds out about he incident...Do you really think that people would recognize her, and know that she was the one involved with the case, especially after 5 years?...I SERIOUSLY doubt that...My guess is that SHE tells people herself, so it is also her fault that she is suffering these "unemployment difficulties"...I mean really, I can't believe that she is THAT 'famous' that people are still discussing her after 5 years:rolleyes:

Sorry for the rant guys...But....FUCK:mad:

TheHitchiker
08-27-2004, 03:16 PM
I hate people who back up the court system with this garbage! Accept your faults, you idiots.