Jeepers Creepers III: Cathedral

[Leatherface3000]

Is Jeepers Creepers 3 coming out in 2005 cause that`s what I heard from one of my friends cause my 13 year old younger brother is waiting for this to come out,and we have the two dvds platinum version,jeepers creepers merchandise,and other merchandise such as all the 3-d freddy krueger comic books my dad got when my oldest sister was 3!Then he collected more when my 2nd older sister was born,then more when my older brother was born,than collected stuff when I was born,and collected stuff when my little brother and little sister were born and still collects since my littlest sister which is 6 years old was born and still does it today along with me and my brothers!
I think the Creeper returns and faces the old man from the 2nd one which in the end of the 2nd one it took 23 years later and then in 2 or 3 days the creeper would return.Then he trys to kill the teenagers and the old man and the son!More characters are added to this such as the son`s wife,son,daughter,and othert kids and teenagers!

[Digital Murders]

God I hope not.

[Ritualistic]

the first one is good.. but nooooooooo god a 3rd one.? man what will he be chasing now a fire truck full of nuns.? haha

[avenger00soul]

Salva talked about doing a prequel once upon a time. But I don't think the sequel stirred up enough buzz for one. Plus, he has other projects in the works.

[predfan]

a prequel would be nice

but no sequel, it'll turn into an action movie/thriller, JC1 was the only proper horror movie in the series

[_Leatha_Face_]

id go to see a third installment even though the 2nd wasnt as good as the first hell maybe the third will rock either way i liked em both and i would go see it :)

[alixzander]

i agree, the first one was pretty good. the second one was kinda lame. a third one might be cool. it depends

[Ultimamk]

I didn't think the 2nd was that bad, just not horrifying enouph.

[Signs515]

I enjoyed the first and second one, but tripple dipping on the same basis would not interest me. A prequel though...now that could be interesting.

[Sam The Egg]

Originally posted by Digital Murders
God I hope not.
you read my mind

[ErikLensherr82]

Eh...depends. I think any movie or sequel might could work right if written right. If its anything like JC2, then Hell no. JC1 was ok though...

[Leatherface3000]

But it could be cool to see
cause they wouldn`t of
made that ending of the creeper
coming back in 2 to 3 days
soo...sorry to break it to ya
but chances are...there is
gonna be a 3rd one

[queenofhorror]

if any body can tell me if there is going to be one let me know i have been watching horror movies since i was little but i would like to know i think there is because of the ending

[William]

From everything I've heard and seen, yes, there is going to be another Jeepers Creepers.

Here's another thread about it:

http://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=3297

[Nightmarian]

Here's another thread that goes deeply trough the whole Jeeper Creepers movies story. You'll find some good stuff there too.

http://www.horror.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=4282

[crazy clown]

i herd that if they make another one it will be a prequel.

[Sick_As_Fuck]

From what I've heard there was supposed to be a sequel in the making, which would've actually been a prequel, but for some reason it was scrapped.

[Loki]

I really dont think i could handle another sequel or a prequel to Jeepers Creepers, the 2nd wasnt fully developed and hardly made an impact on the horror range, i just wasnt even remotely scared, but thats just me.

[XFeaRX]

I hope they dont make Jeepers Creepers 3. Jeepers Creepers 1 was a great movie. 2 was horrible, I could not wait until it would end. 3 could only be that much worse...

[freddy69]

i hope there aint going to be a creepers jeepers 3 that movie fuckin sucks .it is so fuckin stupid

[evil_blonde]

Originally posted by freddy69
i hope there aint going to be a creepers jeepers 3 that movie fuckin sucks .it is so fuckin stupid

u need calm

[feral cat]

The first half of the first movie was top stuff right up there with the classics (that van is just the scariest vehicle) and then from the second half of that movie right through the second movie, it turned into run of the mill modern teen horror nonsense! ... so if the make another I would expect more of the same, but maby if your 11 or 12 years old it might be fun!

Feral Cat

[jay o2 waster]

i liked the first, but the second wasn't that good

[otis]

I hope not. I really didn't like the others. The gore was good, but i just don't like the movie. I like monster movies but just not this one. It gets repetitive.

[GorePhobia]

if they make a Jeepers 3 i just pray they go more in depth of the creeper....make him looks sick....and have him be really twisted in the head

[sleepaway]

Yes I have read there is a third in pre-production. I wish there wasn't!

[wufongtan]

I thought the the first one was excellent especialy the first half. the second half did become a bit rum of the mill stuff but was still pretty good, i haven't seen the second one yet, sequels aren't normaly as good as the first, they rarely are except for the aliens movies they were all excellent. but then again they did have something original to work with so i suppose it wouldn't have been all that hard to make four movies about the some creature , yet still keep some originality. and if they make a third jeepers i hope it isn't a prequell fuck i hate those, movie makers should start at the beging when making a movie ffs.

[MVP732]

I thought the the first one was excellent especialy the first half. the second half did become a bit rum of the mill stuff but was still pretty good, i haven't seen the second one yet, sequels aren't normaly as good as the first, they rarely are except for the aliens movies they were all excellent. but then again they did have something original to work with so i suppose it wouldn't have been all that hard to make four movies about the some creature , yet still keep some originality. and if they make a third jeepers i hope it isn't a prequell ---- i hate those, movie makers should start at the beging when making a movie ffs.

I thought the 1st movie, especially the first half was boring as hell and quite stupid, especially the 10 minute argument in the car at the beginning. I recommend for those who saw the first to see the second because it is indeed better. Another sequel would be overdoing it in my opinion, but maybe they can do it Jason X style, like in the future...

[freddy69]

fuck no i hate that damn movie it sucks

[bwind22]

I thought JC1 was pretty well done. I just wish they didn't try to tie that stupid song into the plot. That part was lame. And the crazy old bitch who knew the future for no apparent reason. She sucked too. I loved the first half, and I really liked the very end. (I love un-happy endings.)

JC2 was a prototypical sequel. A bunch of teens get stranded and then picked off one by one. Too cliche for my taste. I also didn't really like how they made The Creeper so invincible in this one. (Limb and head regeneration? Come on.)

I'm not sure how I feel about the idea of a 3rd film. I'd go see it, of course, but I wouldn't have my hopes set too high. It'll probably follow an even more standard formula that JC2. A prequel might be interesting if done right. They need to explain The Creeper's origin in depth.

[VampiricClown]

I found a site somewhere talking about this.

In a way, I want to see it because I really enjoyed the first one and the beginning of the second one. I hate how they ended the second. The first ones ending was bad enough.

What are your thoughts on this one?

[mothermold]

The first one was good(oringinal and creepy)and almost Hitchcock...well not really,but it was good.The only real viable option left for the filmmakers is to set in the future(man did I see that coming)if they wish to remain true to the original story laid down in the first two installments.In all likelihood it will probably stink but I'll watch it anyway and hope for the best.

[Korpse]

In all likelihood it will probably stink but I'll watch it anyway and hope for the best.
Same.

Enjoyed 1+2 myself.

[The Flayed One]

I'll watch it, I enjoyed the first two.

[The_Return]

Personally, I'd like to see it set in the past. Perhaps not a full explanation of what the Creeper is, but a partial explanation would be nice. I think it would be great set in the mid-1800's or something, not nearly enough horror films take advantage of that time frame. In my opinion, that was one of the few saving graces of The Village...until the ending, that is.

[urgeok]

Originally posted by The_Return
Personally, I'd like to see it set in the past. Perhaps not a full explanation of what the Creeper is, but a partial explanation would be nice.

god i hate it when they do that !!

the unknown is far more interesting ..
everyone always wants to know the origions .. the motives ...

that ruins things for me ...and takes time away from what i really want to see ...

[Posher778]

Not looking forward to this. After the shitbag that was the sequel... I don't want to know what a third will be like. The first is great! I thought the ending was fine, because it didn't pull the PG-13 "they all get away fine and happy" thing.

[Yellow Jacket]

I loved the original, and is one of my favorites! The second sucked Zero's monkeyballs while fingering itself with old, crusty whipped cream! Hopefully, the third will be better.

[Posher778]

Originally posted by Yellow Jacket
I loved the original, and is one of my favorites! The second sucked Zero's monkeyballs while fingering itself with old, crusty whipped cream! Hopefully, the third will be better.

the third better... think about that really carefully... That's happened like 3 times in sequel history.

[sabersword]

The first two were fun and kind of new. The consept of the monster as artist was uniqe, dont you think? Ok, I would like to know somthing about the creeper but, not everything. I did Ginger Snaps 3. It was set in the 1800s. Sort of reminded me of Ravenous.

[Posher778]

yes, but I think all the Ginger Snaps movies were all equally good.

[Yellow Jacket]

Originally posted by Posher778
the third better... think about that really carefully... That's happened like 3 times in sequel history.

I meant the third being better than the second. And this has happened on a few occasions.

NOES 3
Friday the 13th part 3
Child's Play 3

Maybe not that many times, but JC 2 sucked so badly, that I don't see the third being any worse (I probably just jinxed it).

[Posher778]

The only I can think of is Scream 3

[The_Return]

Originally posted by urgeok
god i hate it when they do that !!

the unknown is far more interesting ..
everyone always wants to know the origions .. the motives ...

that ruins things for me ...and takes time away from what i really want to see ...

I like a bit of explanation...not a full blown Pinhead style explanation, where you know everything and anything imaginable, but like they've done in the first two, give slight bits and pieces to help flesh out the character.

Agreed that they do need to keep some mystery to the Creeper, but Id like to be enlightened a bit.

[urgeok]

#2 was fucking great .. i loved it.

necer saw a 'monster' take such shit before ..
it had its ass kicked by everyone ..
loved the ending in the barn too.

[Posher778]

Originally posted by urgeok
#2 was fucking great .. i loved it.

necer saw a 'monster' take such shit before ..
it had its ass kicked by everyone ..
loved the ending in the barn too.

The only scene I liked was when it was grinning and picking out people on the bus.

[Zero]

Originally posted by Yellow Jacket
I loved the original, and is one of my favorites! The second sucked Zero's monkeyballs while fingering itself with old, crusty whipped cream! Hopefully, the third will be better.

ouch keep that thing off my balls.

personally i agree with the others - the first one was really good until the gargoyle rip-off thingy popped up and started flying around. . .second was pablum

oddly enough, i took a 'screenwriting class" for fun a few years back and did a 'treatment' for a jeepers creepers sequel - it was set up like Aliens and featured the sister from #1 many years later seeking out hte creeper for revenge - it was sort of stupid - though it had a twist ending that i'm still quite proud of

(so now i'll just wait for my phone to start ringing with the offers to write and direct!)

[Yellow Jacket]

Originally posted by Zero
ouch keep that thing off my balls.

I tried, but then it just tried suckind my balls (my stinger???)! So, I let it stick with yours.

BTW, I may be using some members names to insult (or praise) a movie. Not insulting anybody (since most of the names I'll be using are people that I like
), just thought it'd be a unique and entertaining way to express my opinions on movies. If anybody doesn't want there name used, just tell me.

[kung-fu-jesus]

1 was good. 2 was okay, and 3 could be good( depending on the story line and setting).

i personaly wouldnt mind seeing( first hand) what happened in the 70's, specificly what dairy and his sister were talking about( the couple that was in the car crash, and later found in the "house of pain"). that could be worth a watch. i wouldnt want to see a movie set in the 1800's or something.

[crazy raplh]

i say bring it. I loved the first two and an orgin would be nice. The first one freeked me out. and the secind was a good one to laugh at. maybe a dark one not so much corn yea know. lol

[slasherman]

Originally posted by Yellow Jacket

Friday the 13th part 3
Child's Play 3

...it didnt happend on these occasions...

Scream 3
NOES 3 (like you said)
Hellraiser 3 (number 2 was to much)
Back to the future 3 ( not horror ...but)

...more to come

[Yellow Jacket]

Originally posted by slasherman
...it didnt happend on these occasions...

Scream 3
NOES 3 (like you said)
Hellraiser 3 (number 2 was to much)
Back to the future 3 ( not horror ...but)

...more to come

I was just going by what I personally thought of the movies. Though, I may be taking Child's Play 3 off of my list since I seem to enjoy watching part 2 a helluva lot more. Each time I watch it I'm seldomy entertain and I always find something to keep me interested each watch. Child's Play 3 is starting to get stale. I still like it, but just not as much as I seem to be likeing part 2. FACTOID: Both Child's Play 2 and Child's Play 3 have received 3 out of 5 stars.

[persuasian70]

I really enjoyed the first half of JC #1, but then it kept on getting worse and worse. The kids were dumb as hell (we just saw a guy dump what looks like bodies into a hole, let's go back and check it out). Then he sprouted wings and then the movie ended so abruptly. It started off sooo promising. I have to say that the second was at least not disappointing. I knew going in what I was going to see. If a #3 comes out, I will definitely wait for it to come out on DVD, if it doesn't go staight to video.

[bwind22]

Okay, I'm perplexed.... What the hell is this?

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/bwind22/jeepers20creepers20320sodeb34.jpg


Did someone just photoshop their own JC3 DVD or is this film already out in Europe?

[Phalanx]

No info on imdb, minimal info turned up through searching, the main message was that production started and was suspended due to funding issues...

[bwind22]

Hmpf! Weird.....



I wonder this picture came from then. Maybe a promotional thing for the marketing department or something....


If anything on this is accurate, (Not sure if it is completely made up or what...) I think it would be interesting to see a female Creeper.

[joshaube]

The cover itself is very obviously done by someone in photoshop, without much know-how of the program. It's a rather shitty cover, and no studio would EVER approve it. Half of the things on it don't even make sense, or are just plain stupid.

I'd be willing to say that the front image is not from the film either. It looks sort of drawn, and not that greatly designed for a creeper.

[urgeok]

although i guess there is a practical reason for it (honing the photoshop skills - and exposure for your abilities) the new fanboy fad of creating your own made up posters (and trailers) - makes you wonder sometimes why they just dont channel their imagination and talents into making the actual goddamn film.

[The_Return]

Another giveaway clue:

Look in the bottom left hand corner of what would be the front cover.

"Un film de sodeh-34" (Should be "par", not "de")

Translated:

"A film of sodeh-34"

Hmm...cant think of many directors that go by a screenname:rolleyes:

[Burning in Hell]

Originally posted by The_Return
Another giveaway clue:

Look in the bottom left hand corner of what would be the front cover.

"Un film de sodeh-34" (Should be "par", not "de")

Translated:

"A film of sodeh-34"

Hmm...cant think of many directors that go by a screenname:rolleyes:

Sorry to rain on your parade, but the the mention is correct by all means.

"A film by" translates into "Un film de" in French, while "Filmed by" would translate into "Filmé par". "Un film par" would not be correct under any circumstance. And I certainly know what I am talking about, since I am French (or French-Canadian if you prefer), AND a translator.

Now, the guy's name, well that is quite another story :D

[paws the great]

The cover looks alot like Return of the Living Dead 3.
The girl even looks like Mindy Clarke.

[Burning in Hell]

Yeah, I thought about ROTLD 3 too...

[Phalanx]

Nah that rotld3 bitch was WAY hotter...

[VampiricClown]

This is what I came across awhile back that made me post the thread about Jeepers Creepers 3. The front looks good, the back looks bad.

It's not real.

[newb]

Its obviously not real........they even stuck a pic of Max van Sydow's, Father Merrin on there.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001884/

[VampiricClown]

Originally posted by newb
Its obviously not real........they even stuck a pic of Max van Sydow's, Father Merrin on there.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001884/

Haha, nice.

[The_Return]

Originally posted by Burning in Hell
Sorry to rain on your parade, but the the mention is correct by all means.

"A film by" translates into "Un film de" in French, while "Filmed by" would translate into "Filmé par". "Un film par" would not be correct under any circumstance. And I certainly know what I am talking about, since I am French (or French-Canadian if you prefer), AND a translator.

Now, the guy's name, well that is quite another story :D

Well thats what I get for dropping out of French at school:o :o

[Korpse]

http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsites/N/nip_tuck/images/gallery_13.jpg

[halloweenfreak1]

Originally posted by bwind22
Okay, I'm perplexed.... What the hell is this?

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y122/bwind22/jeepers20creepers20320sodeb34.jpg


Did someone just photoshop their own JC3 DVD or is this film already out in Europe?

please God no not another one.

[VampiricClown]

Originally posted by halloweenfreak1
please God no not another one.

The first one was good, hated the second though. Too fratboy-ish.

[The_Return]

The first is one of my personal favourite films, and the second was decent too IMO. I would definatly like to see a third.

[halloweenfreak1]

Originally posted by VampiricClown
The first one was good, hated the second though. Too fratboy-ish.
the second one was so horrible it almost made the first on look bad.

[bloodrayne]

Looks like it's actually happening

http://www.themovieinsider.com/m2297/jeepers-creepers-3/

But...It still seems kinda tentative...

[the_real_linda]

why? the first one has grown on me but the second.......i mean are we meant to not want the football players and cheerleaders on the school bus to die???

[jenna26]

I watched the first one, and it was amusing. I have yet to see the second one, though I am sure I will eventually. Same goes for the third one if it comes about, I would probably see it eventually.

[Liar,liar]

I hope its half descent.

http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10337

[Zero]

I hope its half descent.

http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/10337

agreed - if its half as good as THE DESCENT it will be pretty decent.

[Liar,liar]

Yeah The Descent was good and The Descent 2 is supposed to be coming out this year also.

[VampiricClown]

I liked the original, the second sucked.

And I didn't like The Descent. So I'm not looking forward to that sequel.

[bigaza]

Yeah The Descent was good and The Descent 2 is supposed to be coming out this year also.

how the f**k can you do a sequel to the descent?! their gonna ruin it!!!

[ChronoGrl]

I liked the original, the second sucked.

And I didn't like The Descent. So I'm not looking forward to that sequel.

Oh, man... The Descent is one of my favorite Monster Movies and all-time favorite horror movies...

BUT

It DEFINITELY has it pitfalls... Lots of them, actually... I think it's a film with a lot of mistakes and a lot of merits... Pick and choose which outweighs the other. I choose "merits," but I can't argue with someone who would choose "mistakes."

...

Re: Another Jeepers Creepers. Honestly, I REALLY liked the original. I found it incredibly underrated. I thought that it built believable sympathetic (but not PAthetic) characters and a successfully creepy villain/killer. I thought that there was descent build-up. I loved it.

Jeepers Creepers 2... It was... Ok... It chose a different genre - Siege mixed in with a little bit o' revenge.

BUT

It was really Leland Palmer that makes it.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v623/Chronogrl/Leland.gif

If he's not in the 3rd, I'm not interested.

[VampiricClown]

Oh, man... The Descent is one of my favorite Monster Movies and all-time favorite horror movies...

BUT

It DEFINITELY has it pitfalls... Lots of them, actually... I think it's a film with a lot of mistakes and a lot of merits... Pick and choose which outweighs the other. I choose "merits," but I can't argue with someone who would choose "mistakes."


My biggest problem with it was the fact that it, even though effective to some, was all about the claustrophobic caves and feel. Oddly enough, I feel safer in those situations. It seemed to drag on, and for some reason, the monsters were disappointing to me. It just didn't work for me.

[ChronoGrl]

My biggest problem with it was the fact that it, even though effective to some, was all about the claustrophobic caves and feel. Oddly enough, I feel safer in those situations. It seemed to drag on, and for some reason, the monsters were disappointing to me. It just didn't work for me.

That's interesting how claustrophobia isn't effective on you... What films work for you?

Honestly, the claustrophobia was VERY effective for me... My problem was that the director painstakingly took the first 1/2 hour in the cave bringing up this incredibly intense and claustrophobic feel to it...

And then the girls spend the rest of the movie running around from the monsters.

Claustrophobia vs. Haunted House Maze.

It's actually laughable when I think about it.

[joshaube]

Claustrophobia isn't that effective on me, either, since I prefer small spaces as opposed to large ones. I'm comfortable with small spaces, as long as I can easily remove myself from the smaller setting when I wish. Claustrophobia becomes a problem when I am trapped so tightly it is hard to move, or when I'm stuck in a space with no possible exit. Like being buried alive. I'm no Uma Thurman, so I'd pretty much be screwed.

That's where The Descent got me. Climbing through those small tunnels, unable to go backwards, and once the exits caved in? Hell.

---

Back on topic, I'm actually looking forward to a third Jeepers Creepers film. Not a 'see-it-in-theatres-on-day-one' type of anticipation, nor any anticipation at all really... but I wouldn't say no to watching the DVD.

I think The Creeper is a pretty effective character. Hell, while the second film was no masterpiece, it held some pretty tense Creeper moments. When he breathed heavily on to the glass of the bus? Freaked me out for a while.

[VampiricClown]

That's interesting how claustrophobia isn't effective on you... What films work for you?

Honestly, the claustrophobia was VERY effective for me... My problem was that the director painstakingly took the first 1/2 hour in the cave bringing up this incredibly intense and claustrophobic feel to it...

And then the girls spend the rest of the movie running around from the monsters.

Claustrophobia vs. Haunted House Maze.

It's actually laughable when I think about it.

They were running around, yes. But the time it took to get to that part, eh, it seemed like too much.

As far as what works for me, nothing really. I'm not really scared of anything. There are a few movies that have left a slight impression, such as Henry: Portrait Of A Serial Killer and Dead Birds(Not sure why). But they don't really make me squirm in my seat.

Now I will say High Tension kept me on the edge of my seat...literally. But it was a very fast paced movie, and it had suspense that seemed to work. I enjoyed it. But not all movies like this, I enjoy.

Creep was a pretty fast paced movie, but it really wasn't my forté. It didn't have enough depth, and there was a lot that it didn't explain. Not to mention I had really high hopes for it, considering the great reviews it got. And that may have been part of my problem with The Descent. I had too high of hopes and expectations, and when it didn't work the way I had hoped, it fell off of my list.

As far as Jeepers Creepers, the first one wasn't really scary, but I did love the atmosphere and style. A very creepy film, and a good attempt at another slasher villain. The second one started out okay, but turned back downhill for the rest of the film, very quickly. I don't care to watch the second installment, again, anytime soon. Not to mention the insane amount of pointless profanity.

Maybe I'm expecting too much out of new movies, but some are just outright, awful. Example, the White Noise series. But I do tend to like a lot of the very, very, low budget films out there. But hey, that's just me.

[ferretchucker]

I do like the creeper and I loved the first jeepers creepers. It was an excellent film and the ending was very unexpected and sudden. Kinda good like "Oh my god...it's over." The second one was not good at all, but not particularly bad. I would be interested in seeing the psychic woman and the main girl from the first one return, it would be pretty cool.

[colubrid660]

I never caught the first two films. Are they good monster flicks, or trumped up B-quality trash?

[VampiricClown]

I never caught the first two films. Are they good monster flicks, or trumped up B-quality trash?

Depends on your taste. I thought the first one was a rather good horror film. The second one fell behind.

[colubrid660]

Depends on your taste. I thought the first one was a rather good horror film. The second one fell behind.

I'll give it a shot then. It looked rather good in the previews....

[_____V_____]

July 09, 2008


About eight months back, Victor Salva was in talks to direct the third installment of his Jeepers Creepers franchise for MGM. Various news stories have broke since then, with rumors of a possible back-to-back shoot with a fourth film.

Today it was revealed that the film will now carry a new moniker and that it is about to begin shooting.

Once titled Jeepers Creepers 3: The Creeper Walks Among Us, Fangoria received word that the film will now be titled Jeepers Creepers III: Cathedral and is about to enter preproduction.

“The script, now titled Jeepers Creepers III: Cathedral, is about to enter pre-production at MGM and does include a prologue in the Old West where we see how the Creeper became a frightening part of cowboy and Native American folklore...”

Salva also reveals some plot points of the story and explains how Gina Philips makes her return to the franchise, news which we also broke exclusively here in March.

"...one aspect of the third film features Trish Jenner [again played by Gina Philips from the original film], who, 23 years later, has a teenage son of her own, named Darry after her long lost brother. Trish is having a terrible recurring dream where her son meets the same terrible fate as her brother. Now a rich and powerful woman, Trish is determined to stop the Creeper once and for all.”

Salva also teases that "It also revisits characters from both films, lets us learn more about what the Creeper is and, by popular demand, reintroduces the infamous Creeper truck.”

[horrorchic]

I know that this may be a sad thought, but I am kinda excited about seeing or even hearing more about this. I liked the first one. The second one drug about, but the third sounds great. I love when they try to explain the past from a future perspective.

[bwind22]

I liked JC alot, JC2 was very very run of the mill, JC3 sounds very cool.


It's always nice to know the origins, and continuity is a good thing too.

[Amalthea_unicorn]

I'm excited too.

[newb]

Big fan of the first....didn't hate the second...looking forward to the third.

[urgeok2]

really liked them both..

big fan of the second one - more than most people.


i will say though that these would be even more fun if they hadn't been directed by a convicted pedophile

[Vodstok]

really liked them both..

big fan of the second one - more than most people.


i will say though that these would be even more fun if they hadn't been directed by a convicted pedophile
I liked the first one, the second one was way better than i expected, so i would definitely enjoy a third.

And yes, they would be way more enjoyable if i didnt know the writer director liked boys. powder was good too.

[Ferox13]

Cool - i look forward to lots more scenes of topless boys like in JC2.

He needs to make a movie with Larry Clarke - I bet it would be awsome :-)

[urgeok2]

And yes, they would be way more enjoyable if i didnt know the writer director liked boys. powder was good too.

..little boys ...

[_____V_____]

The next Joel Schumacher in the making?

[Vodstok]

..little boys ...
man, why so uptight? just becuse you have a little boy...


I was hugely disappointed when i found out about him. but look at his pic on imdb, he LOOKS like a fucking pervert.

[Ferox13]

he LOOKS like a fucking pervert.

Indeed - he was part of my a xmas decoration set i made a few years back - hollywood rapists was the theme..(i used to do a different set every year)



http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/ferox-13/xmas4.jpg

[Vodstok]

HAHAHA!


that was funny...

[newb]

The next Joel Schumacher in the making?

Does that mean the next Creeper is gonna have nipples?

[massacre man]

Does that mean the next Creeper is gonna have nipples?

Ass close-ups?

[The_Return]

...lets us learn more about what the Creeper is...

Lets just hope that they dont go too overboard with that, and we should have another pretty sweet movie.

The first JC has to one of my favourite post-2000 horror movies, and even though the 2nd wasn't on par, it was still a fun ride. I have faith that Mr. Child Predator will give us another great flick to round out the trilogy.

[ChronoGrl]

Ferox, that is quite possibly the best Christmas card ever.

...

Personally, I thought that the first Jeepers Creepers was a fantastic little film and didn't get the exposure that it deserved. It was a solid, creepy monster movie with some good scares and some genuinely gory scenes.

As its been said, the second one was run-of-the-mill. More of a siege/action/revenge film than its predecessor.

I am indeed looking forward to the third film, but I am generally wary of origin flicks.

Salva also teases that "It also revisits characters from both films, lets us learn more about what the Creeper is and, by popular demand, reintroduces the infamous Creeper truck.”

Good GOD I hope that means that Leland Palmer comes back. He HAS too. He ENDS the second film.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v623/Chronogrl/Leland.gif

That's right; I refuse to call him anything but Leland Palmer.

[newb]

Ferox, that is quite possibly the best Christmas card ever.

...

Personally, I thought that the first Jeepers Creepers was a fantastic little film and didn't get the exposure that it deserved. It was a solid, creepy monster movie with some good scares and some genuinely gory scenes.

As its been said, the second one was run-of-the-mill. More of a siege/action/revenge film than its predecessor.

I am indeed looking forward to the third film, but I am generally wary of origin flicks.



Good GOD I hope that means that Leland Palmer comes back. He HAS too. He ENDS the second film.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v623/Chronogrl/Leland.gif

That's right; I refuse to call him anything but Leland Palmer.

me and the wife were so hooked on that show when it originally aired. good fun.....perhaps a rental is in the future......God...has it been almost twenty years.....

[massacre man]

Ferox, that is quite possibly the best Christmas card ever.

...

Personally, I thought that the first Jeepers Creepers was a fantastic little film and didn't get the exposure that it deserved. It was a solid, creepy monster movie with some good scares and some genuinely gory scenes.

As its been said, the second one was run-of-the-mill. More of a siege/action/revenge film than its predecessor.

I am indeed looking forward to the third film, but I am generally wary of origin flicks.



Good GOD I hope that means that Leland Palmer comes back. He HAS too. He ENDS the second film.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v623/Chronogrl/Leland.gif

That's right; I refuse to call him anything but Leland Palmer.

But that's Ray Wise, right?

[newb]

But that's Ray Wise, right?

it is


doesn't he play the Devil on some TV show.....I pretty much stopped watching TV nowadays.

[massacre man]

it is


doesn't he play the Devil on some TV show.....I pretty much stopped watching TV nowadays.

Yeah, he plays The Devil on "Reaper".

I'd recommend the show. The first episode was directed by Kevin Smith. Some of the episodes in the middle of the season dragged, but the last 5 or 6 episodes were amazing.

[ChronoGrl]

me and the wife were so hooked on that show when it originally aired. good fun.....perhaps a rental is in the future......God...has it been almost twenty years.....

Absolutely.

I've seen all of Season 1 as well as Fire Walk With Me (though I wish I had waited to see Season 2 before the movie).

The day that Season 2 came out on DVD I picked it up IMMEDIATELY (I had been waiting for its release after Season 1 for at least a year), though, for some reason I haven't gotten myself to watching it yet...

I guess I'm still slightly bitter that the Pilot episode was released separately from Season 1 in America. How LAME is that?!

I haven't seen The Reaper yet... I was intrigued when it first came out, but haven't heard anything spectacular about it, so I haven't watched it yet.

[The_Return]

Good GOD I hope that means that Leland Palmer comes back. He HAS too. He ENDS the second film.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v623/Chronogrl/Leland.gif

That's right; I refuse to call him anything but Leland Palmer.

I haven't watched JCII since way before I got into Twin Peaks...never even made the connection!

Damn, now I really need to watch it again. Leland Palmer owns you.

And Chrono, I HIGHLY recommend looking into the Gold Box edition of Twin Peaks. It's pricey, but it includes both version of the pilot + both seasons in all their glory. Its also got some pretty sweet special features...worth every penny if you ask me.

I still need to check out Fire Walk With Me though...

[leezuki]

i hope this one will be as good as the rest, i liked the first one up until he became a monster, but still enjoyed it.they are planning making a tv series after the movie, dont know if that will ruin the movies.

http://www.worstpreviews.com/headline.php?id=22233

[The Villain]

Heard about this awhile ago. The second one sucked so im not expecting much out of this.

[leezuki]

Heard about this awhile ago. The second one sucked so im not expecting much out of this.

i quite liked the second one, dont ask me why lol.

[The Villain]

It just didnt have the creepy factor that the first one did. Although i did really like the beginning with the scarecrow thing.

[leezuki]

It just didnt have the creepy factor that the first one did. Although i did really like the beginning with the scarecrow thing.

that was the best part of the movie, i liked the first one with all the creepy part of the begining, but i think it would have been better if u dint find out he was a monster, just leave not knowing what he is.

[cheebacheeba]

Yeah, that's what I didn't like about JC2, turned into a killing spree splatterfest (which appeals to some) at the relative cost of a lot of the atmosphere the first one had going for it.
Not to mention the *amount* of characters stuck in the bus just made it so you didn't really bother seeing them as anything other than cannon fodder.
Didn't much like the weapons, didn't think they were necessary and came across as a little too derivative of predator for my liking - though in all honesty I could have accepted this if the movie was more tense and atmospheric.

I've heard many a rumour about the third, seems the most recent I recall is actually meant to be set in the next "rising" period of the creeper.
I had previously heard about a prequel set around the "dark ages", that didn't go much past that...though an origins series may be ok...I think that will largely depend upon any kind of success of the third film though, whenever/IFever the fuck they release it.

[leezuki]

yeah i hated all the weapons he was using, that ruined it for me.

[ABjerg]

It just didnt have the creepy factor that the first one did. Although i did really like the beginning with the scarecrow thing.
Same with me.. Beginning was cool, but the rest was kinda comedy-like tbh, and the first one was a lot scarier.

I hope this will be as good as the first or better, and not as funny as the second.

[TheWickerFan]

Unless people start saying this is much worse than the second one, I'll be watching it. I LOVE the Creeper.:D

[The_Return]

I've loved both entries so far, been looking forward to this one for ages.

The first one was easily one of the best mainstream horrors of the 2000's, and even though the second one wasn't anywhere near as atmospheric or cool, I still thought it was a hell of a lot of fun. Maybe a little silly, but still enjoyable.

Hopefully #3 takes things back to the level of this first, but honestly I'm just excited to see the Creeper again. Can't wait.

[bwind22]

^^ Agree 100% with Return.

[leezuki]

^^ Agree 100% with Return.

i liked the second one, alot of people dint.what u think bout tv series being made.

[The_Return]

what u think bout tv series being made.

Little more apprehensive about that...lets be honest here, most horror TV shows kinda suck. Plus, as much as I love the character and want to know more about his mythology and everything, not knowing is a big part of the fun.

Its been discussed here a million times, but slasher type characters tend to get less interesting as the films reveal more and more about them. Another movie, I'm 100% in favor of. Salva's done a great job keeping us in the dark about the Creeper's origins so far, and I'm sure he'll keep it up. But a TV series? I worry that it'd get out of hand really fast.

But really, its probably not even worth discussing...they've been almost 10 years trying to get the 3rd movie off the ground. Whether its a good idea or not, do you really think the TV show will ever hit the airwaves? I can't see it.

[leezuki]

Little more apprehensive about that...lets be honest here, most horror TV shows kinda suck. Plus, as much as I love the character and want to know more about his mythology and everything, not knowing is a big part of the fun.

Its been discussed here a million times, but slasher type characters tend to get less interesting as the films reveal more and more about them. Another movie, I'm 100% in favor of. Salva's done a great job keeping us in the dark about the Creeper's origins so far, and I'm sure he'll keep it up. But a TV series? I worry that it'd get out of hand really fast.

But really, its probably not even worth discussing...they've been almost 10 years trying to get the 3rd movie off the ground. Whether its a good idea or not, do you really think the TV show will ever hit the airwaves? I can't see it.

i totally agree with u there, tv will ruin the movies.the creeper was better not knowing his past.but i think the movies would have been better if we did not know what he was alltogether, when it was revealed he was a monster it put me off a bit. would have been better keeping him in the shadows.

[Fearonsarms]

I liked both movies but for different reasons-I'd much rather a third film was made instead of remaking the first which I'm sure was considered.

[Rela1024]

I agree tv show wouldnt work but a 3rd installment just might but a remake??.....no not if theyre gonna make up a back story
some characters dont need a story I like that I dont know what he really is (a bat person thing with wings?? idk if it was mentioned i missed it) but the not knowing makes him mysterious which makes him creepy

[The Villain]

I agree tv show wouldnt work but a 3rd installment just might but a remake??.....no not if theyre gonna make up a back story
some characters dont need a story I like that I dont know what he really is (a bat person thing with wings?? idk if it was mentioned i missed it) but the not knowing makes him mysterious which makes him creepy

It's a monster. Why does it really need to be explained further?

[Rela1024]

it doesnt and thats probably the trouble theyre having with getting it off the ground

[The Villain]

it doesnt and thats probably the trouble theyre having with getting it off the ground

Why is that a problem though? There are tons of monster movies out there where the monsters are just that, monsters. Why do they need to be so specifically categorized so people can enjoy it. The problem the movies are having is that the second one was a let down and the beginning of the first one was so good that the rest of it just seemed disappointing.

[leezuki]

that's y i think they ruined michael myers, going into detail what was wrong with him and and all the mental hospital crap and blah blah, some things are just best left to your own imagination. i thought the second jeepers was ok, the fist half of the first one was good up until he had to become a monster, the movie was creepy up until that point, then i drifted away from the movie because it became to much of a monster show for me.

[hammerfan]

I just watched a video on YouTube for this. Grown-up Trish Jenner (portrayed by the same actress from the first movie) and her teenage son, Darry, fighting the Creeper.

I'm actually looking forward to this!

Oh, and, I really suck at trying to post videos here, so sorry for no video.

hoGFUSIzNXI

That's the best I can do, sorry.

[hammerfan]

Thank you, Avi. And, I apologize, I looked to see if there was a thread already and didn't see one. Guess I need new glasses! :o

[newb]

I liked the first one....didn't hate the second one. So I'll be watching the 3rd one.

But I won't watch the trailer....the damn thing is over 6 minutes long.....sure to be spoilers galore.

[cheebacheeba]

But I won't watch the trailer....the damn thing is over 6 minutes long.....sure to be spoilers galore.
Actually the trailer is only 2 minutes long.
It starts replaying, or there's an alternate trailer after it.
Not too many spoilers at all.

[Elvis_Christ]

Do they let this guy direct kids now?

[wizard of gore]

thought it was fuckin cool that he turned out to be a monster,not enough good monster movies these days.i reckon the movie has potential to be awsome.been awhile since 2 ,surley reviews and stuf would have inspired them to relate the movie closer to 1,and that two was taking it in the wrong direction

[crazy raplh]

It throws off the time line. I thought the farmer kept the creeper for 30 years like the end of part 2 or what ever. he must have let him go. I dont know.