View Full Version : Drowning Pool New Singer
kpropain
02-10-2004, 05:19 AM
Drowning Pool have confirmed they have a new lead singer after the death of Dave Williams.Jason Jones will be the new singer. I personally love these guys. I got to hang out with them on their bus getting fucked up till 4 in the morning, in Charlotte NC before the death of Dave. Very cool guys. Info http://www.drowningpool.com/
GorePhobia
02-10-2004, 11:24 AM
he sounds really good and i hung with them to....three times it was awesome rip dave
bloodrayne
02-10-2004, 11:49 AM
The only Drowning Pool song I even like is "Bodies"...and that's for the music NOT the lyrics
Evisceration
02-10-2004, 12:37 PM
Originally posted by bloodrayne
The only Drowning Pool song I even like is "Bodies"...and that's for the music NOT the lyrics
Can we say one hit wonders?
I can.
I don't like them, the only song that I like is...the last one on the CD, I can't remember since I don't have it anymore.
EDIT
Song is called Sermon.
And I just took my time to hear the new song to only find out their new singer is crap. He sounds a like Dave, which is retarded.
Ritualistic
02-15-2004, 05:00 PM
FUCK THIS!!
Arioch
02-15-2004, 08:54 PM
I just hope they dont still play the shit out of that horrible "bodies" song.
1, nothing wrong with me, 2, nothing wrong with me.........
Thats pretty horrible writing.:rolleyes:
NirvanaNole
02-16-2004, 10:19 PM
I met them before their first CD came out. I still have the sample CD they gave out before they opened for someone, I think it was Finger 11 and Boy Hits Car, back in Tally when I was at FSU. They were cool guys. Even though I still thought the guitarist looked l like a moron with that stupid haircut. I think my ankle was bigger than his thigh lol. I remember him coming in and taking a piss by me and talking to one of his friends about his brother (think it was a little brother) doing something recently that had annoyed him.
I still have the two song CD sample with Bodies and Tear Away on it that was handed out before they took the stage. I was sad to see the singer died. They were nice guys when I talked to them when people were ignoring them, and I had hoped they'd do well since they weren't assmunches with big egos.
And for what it is worth, I think "Bodies" was a decent song and the guitar on "Tear Away" is very cool. I just never got around to buying their CD.
"Breakkkkkkkkk......."
last bad move
02-27-2004, 10:52 PM
im a big fan but i think it is bullshit that they are still going to be drowning pool. they should stay together but change the name and not get a dave copy. start a new band. its reminds me of when the doors toured again. stuff like that pisses me off. it would be like alice in chains getting a new singer.
Arioch
02-27-2004, 11:13 PM
im a big fan but i think it is bullshit that they are still going to be drowning pool. they should stay together but change the name and not get a dave copy. start a new band. its reminds me of when the doors toured again. stuff like that pisses me off. it would be like alice in chains getting a new singer
Agreed, pretty lame. They want the name to make more money.
SphereMan
03-06-2004, 04:07 PM
Love that Kix shirt!:cool:
Evisceration
03-06-2004, 04:38 PM
Originally posted by last bad move
im a big fan but i think it is bullshit that they are still going to be drowning pool. they should stay together but change the name and not get a dave copy. start a new band. its reminds me of when the doors toured again. stuff like that pisses me off. it would be like alice in chains getting a new singer.
If Coal Chamber can do it, they can do it too....:rolleyes:
wheels128
03-06-2004, 06:04 PM
If Coal Chamber can do it, they can do it too....
Not to mention Australian metallers Segression - whose whole band is now in a nu-metal side project... "We want to sell out, but not under our main name".
joeltrae
03-07-2004, 06:10 AM
What is the appeal of retarded, untalented, uncreative bands? I don't get it. But it may be due to the fact that young people have never been exposed to truly great music (Beatles,Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, AC/DC, Black Sabbath etc.) and therefore don't recognize utter SHIT when they hear it.
shiftyc2
03-07-2004, 06:45 AM
yo u cant call it drowning pool its a completely differnt group now without the other dude
last bad move
03-07-2004, 01:02 PM
Originally posted by joeltrae
What is the appeal of retarded, untalented, uncreative bands? I don't get it. But it may be due to the fact that young people have never been exposed to truly great music (Beatles,Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, AC/DC, Black Sabbath etc.) and therefore don't recognize utter SHIT when they hear it.
dude the rolling stone stones, the beatles suck and i dont like ac/dc either (there drummer blows dogs for quarters)
but black sabbath and led zeppelin rule
Evisceration
03-07-2004, 04:01 PM
Originally posted by joeltrae
What is the appeal of retarded, untalented, uncreative bands? I don't get it. But it may be due to the fact that young people have never been exposed to truly great music (Beatles,Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, AC/DC, Black Sabbath etc.) and therefore don't recognize utter SHIT when they hear it.
Yeah I know what you mean, especially since you named some of the shittiest bands known to man.:rolleyes:
joeltrae
03-07-2004, 08:32 PM
Originally posted by Evisceration
Yeah I know what you mean, especially since you named some of the shittiest bands known to man.:rolleyes: I respect your opinion, however, it is of significance that some of these bands' musical works are over 30 years old, and still seems to appeal to many people today. Also, those who study the evolution of rock music, actually believe, and I wholeheartedly agree, that these bands are pretty darn important in it's progression. Finally, it is my belief that in another 30 years, these bands will still be listened to and remembered for their historical significance. I wonder if the musical works of a band like Drowning Pool will be remembered and listened to over 30 years after creation, like with every band I mentioned is today. I seriously doubt it.
wheels128
03-08-2004, 12:09 AM
Joel has a point - the bands he listed have stood the test of time. But I disagree with him generally because I think a few of the bands that are around now shit all over the generally-speaking boring and monotonous older bands you listed. They've taken the platforms built by the Zeppelin's and the Black Sabbath's and created something over the top of that which is more exciting, more complicated and generally more intense.
Plus: My dad owns the full back catalogue of a couple of the bands you mentioned on vinyl - I've heard enough of it to know that it's about as interesting as a new Vanilla Ice album.
Evisceration
03-08-2004, 03:55 AM
Originally posted by joeltrae
I respect your opinion, however, it is of significance that some of these bands' musical works are over 30 years old, and still seems to appeal to many people today. Also, those who study the evolution of rock music, actually believe, and I wholeheartedly agree, that these bands are pretty darn important in it's progression. Finally, it is my belief that in another 30 years, these bands will still be listened to and remembered for their historical significance. I wonder if the musical works of a band like Drowning Pool will be remembered and listened to over 30 years after creation, like with every band I mentioned is today. I seriously doubt it.
You wonder? Why wonder? We both know that they aren't going to be listened to them 30 years from now.