Subliminal

[bloody_ribcut]

i spent allday yesterday researching subliminal messages and decided to look for my own......looking through yahoo pictures of disney movies i came across this one.....does the brown bone in the corner look like something??

http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj283/gus2/micksub.jpg

:)

have any of you seen any?

[neverending]

Seems more like wishful thinking to me...

[bloody_ribcut]

:rolleyes: it would seem that way to you, wouldnt it?


ok, back to the thread........

[Vodstok]

the fact that it is partially cut off makes it look suggestive

[ferretchucker]

I'm trying to work out how Mickey mouse is anthropomorphic when the other animals aren't, and why he is larger than both a dog and kittens.

[bloody_ribcut]

the fact that it is partially cut off makes it look suggestive

thats how the pic was, even if it was completed i dont see how it would be drawn to look like a normal bone...the smooth side doesnt match the other side.

[bloody_ribcut]

i forgot to mention , mickey throwing the http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x121/foxxmarc/bush/bush_satan_sign.jpg

[Vodstok]

old news but speaking of disney....

http://citym.org/ue/little_mermaid.jpg



The little mermaid is my daughter's favorite movie, she loves Ariel...

[ferretchucker]

Another Disney naughty...


http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p255/ferretchucker/Rescuers_Topless_Woman.jpg


Yeh, I know this is old too, but who cares?

[bloody_ribcut]

old news but speaking of disney....

http://citym.org/ue/little_mermaid.jpg



The little mermaid is my daughter's favorite movie, she loves Ariel...


my sister does too, i just hope its not because of disneys perversions.


ok, so we know they are there...what can we do? most people always blow it off and say its wishfull thinking and what not....

isnt it illegal?

[bloody_ribcut]

Another Disney naughty...


http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p255/ferretchucker/Rescuers_Topless_Woman.jpg


Yeh, I know this is old too, but who cares?

i dont care, this one is a personal favorite. in the film this wasnt even remotely visable......disney along with other freemason groups are brainwashing us..

[ferretchucker]

Yeh. Theres a video here showing it all.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=nL0Tf2opWw4

[bloody_ribcut]

hers a couple more, you probably seen this one already too..http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj283/gus2/cocacola_subliminal.jpg

this one was on recently, and admitted to being a sublimnal mssage by kfc. saying the first thousand peole who mention this gets a free sandwich...http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj283/gus2/kfc_copy.jpg

[missmacabre]

this isn't subliminal, its just a small insert of the founders as children but hilarious anyway.

http://bread-and-honey.blogspot.com/2008/10/wtf-broccoli.html

[bloody_ribcut]

this isn't subliminal, its just a small insert of the founders as children but hilarious anyway.

http://bread-and-honey.blogspot.com/2008/10/wtf-broccoli.html

haha, that would be scary as hell.

[alkytrio666]

my sister does too, i just hope its not because of disneys perversions.


ok, so we know they are there...what can we do? most people always blow it off and say its wishfull thinking and what not....

isnt it illegal?
Illegal? Seriously?

"We were endlessly scowering your hand-drawn animations and found something that if magnified looks a little bit like a penis. You are sentenced to 10 years for phallic discrepancy."

Gimme a break!

[bloody_ribcut]

Illegal? Seriously?

"We were endlessly scowering your hand-drawn animations and found something that if magnified looks a little bit like a penis. You are sentenced to 10 years for phallic discrepancy."

Gimme a break!


alright, forget about it....keep being subconsiousley raped.

[fortunato]

Most of these things are indeed skewed and embellished and "wishful thinking".

http://snopes.com/disney/films/films.asp

[massacre man]

I'm trying to work out how Mickey mouse is anthropomorphic when the other animals aren't, and why he is larger than both a dog and kittens.

It's a cartoon...

[bloody_ribcut]

Most of these things are indeed skewed and embellished and "wishful thinking".

http://snopes.com/disney/films/films.asp


the priest one is true.

[La Chat Noire]

the priest one is true.

yeah it is...a friend showed me that a few years ago and I can't watch that movie without looking for it every time now.

[neverending]

yeah it is...a friend showed me that a few years ago and I can't watch that movie without looking for it every time now.

Wrong again....

http://snopes.com/disney/films/minister.asp

[La Chat Noire]

That's kind of a relief to know my favorite childhood movie retains all its innocence.

[bwind22]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2227/2384369676_f74afe5424_o.jpg

[neverending]

People are so quick to believe badthings, rumors and heresay- yet it's often nearly impossible to change their minds once they have come to believe something.

It's cool you can listen to common sense.

[bwind22]

http://curezone.com/upload/Blogs/eruptingmind/Untitled_6.jpg

[neverending]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2227/2384369676_f74afe5424_o.jpg

And once again, from the same link provided by fortunato earlier:

http://snopes.com/disney/films/lionking.asp

[bwind22]

http://caligulaversusnero.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/mermaid-bishop-beforeafter.jpg

I had never heard of this one before but evidently, they corrected his bulge after it was noticed so the majority of copies of Little Mermaid do not contain this one.

[bwind22]

And once again, from the same link provided by fortunato earlier:

http://snopes.com/disney/films/lionking.asp


Snopes says undetermined, but it's pretty clear when you are looking at a still. When watching the film it's almost impossible to see, that's why it's subliminal.

[neverending]

http://caligulaversusnero.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/mermaid-bishop-beforeafter.jpg

I had never heard of this one before but evidently, they corrected his bulge after it was noticed so the majority of copies of Little Mermaid do not contain this one.

And once again, from the top of this page:

Wrong again....

http://snopes.com/disney/films/minister.asp

[bwind22]

And once again, from the top of this page:

Doesn't look like his knee in that pic, but like I said I had never heard about that one before.

Jessica Rabbit is definitely spreading eagle though and The Lion King looks a hell of a lot more like it says SEX than SFX.

[neverending]

Well, to quote the Rock Man from "The Point":

"Ya see what you wanna see, and ya hear what ya wanna hear."

[bwind22]

Agreed. Everyone can look at the pics and judge for themselves. Personally, I think if they wanted it to say SFX, they could have certainly made it look more like an F, than an E, but I digress...

[hacelikewhoa]

definitely a cock

[bloodrayne]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v69/BloodRayne/pg34a_1.jpg

[bloody_ribcut]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v69/BloodRayne/pg34a_1.jpg

what movie is that one?

[bloodrayne]

what movie is that one?
Scrat in 'No Time For Nuts' from Ice Age 2
http://www.blueskystudios.com/content/shorts-notimefornuts.php

[urgeok2]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v69/BloodRayne/pg34a_1.jpg

nothing submiminal about that - very deliberate - very funny :)

[bloodrayne]

nothing submiminal about that - very deliberate - very funny :)You have a point...I wasn't sure if it would count here because it was obviously deliberate.

[urgeok2]

You have a point....

i try to wear a hat so no one will notice :o

[pinkfloyd45769]

I had to look really hard at these pics to even see this stuff.My imagine just isn't wild enough i guess:)

[ferretchucker]

Yeh, most of those aren't really "naughties".

- It was definitely his knee.
- It did say SFX
- It isn't a penis, just the animators were rushing as they had little time left.

BUT

- Jessica Rabbit did flash. Disney apparently were furious at the animators, who thought it was a joke.
- The Rescuers was true. Loads of videos were recalled due to it. The origin remains unknown.


Other ones people may have noticed such as Alladin saying "Take off your clothes" was him saying "Take off and go".

But what was that about rafiki saying "shoved bananas up his arse?"

[bloody_ribcut]

Yeh, most of those aren't really "naughties".

- It was definitely his knee.
- It did say SFX
- It isn't a penis, just the animators were rushing as they had little time left.

BUT

- Jessica Rabbit did flash. Disney apparently were furious at the animators, who thought it was a joke.
- The Rescuers was true. Loads of videos were recalled due to it. The origin remains unknown.


Other ones people may have noticed such as Alladin saying "Take off your clothes" was him saying "Take off and go".

But what was that about rafiki saying "shoved bananas up his arse?"



one knee?

ok, they admit it spelling sfx? why would it spell sfx?
sex sells...


and i read somewhere it is a penis, tat was drawn by a dusgruntled employee..

[ferretchucker]

one knee?

ok, they admit it spelling sfx? why would it spell sfx?
sex sells...


and i read somewhere it is a penis, tat was drawn by a dusgruntled employee..

One knee from one angle

And the SFX thing was meant to be a signature of sorts from the special effects team.

and as for the penis, that too is a rumor. It was a guy who didn't work for disney and so had no reason to be disgruntled with them, and it was being rushed at 4:00am.

[neverending]

one knee?

ok, they admit it spelling sfx? why would it spell sfx?
sex sells...


and i read somewhere it is a penis, tat was drawn by a dusgruntled employee..

Here's the link AGAIN with all the explainations. You probably won't read it this time either.

http://snopes.com/disney/films/films.asp

[alkytrio666]

one knee?

ok, they admit it spelling sfx? why would it spell sfx?
sex sells...


and i read somewhere it is a penis, tat was drawn by a dusgruntled employee..
Oh come on. Do you actually believe that the animators were trying to sell the film by "subliminally" inserting the word "sex"? And furthermore, do you actually think any kid is going to notice this- whether it's SFX (which it is) or sex?

[pinkfloyd45769]

To be honest,i didn't even know what the deal was with that Lion King pic.If a person is going to sit and look that close for this stuff,they have way to much time on their hands.

[alkytrio666]

To be honest,i didn't even know what the deal was with that Lion King pic.If a person is going to sit and look that close for this stuff,they have way to much time on their hands.
Exactly- its rediculous. And to want to "do something about it" is laughable.

[pinkfloyd45769]

Exactly- its rediculous. And to want to "do something about it" is laughable.

Even if someone wanted to try to do something about it...that movie is so old.Get over it already!!!:rolleyes:

[bwind22]

It definitely looks more like an E than F. Why they'd bother putting SEX or SFX is another subject completely. The animators are the ones with too much time on their hands.

"Let's put a subliminal SFX message in there."

"Yeah, great idea!"

Pssht. Fuckin' dweebs.

[bloody_ribcut]

http://i275.photobucket.com/albums/jj283/gus2/nipple.jpg

[ChronoGrl]

Doesn't look like his knee in that pic, but like I said I had never heard about that one before.

Jessica Rabbit is definitely spreading eagle though and The Lion King looks a hell of a lot more like it says SEX than SFX.

Well, to quote the Rock Man from "The Point":

"Ya see what you wanna see, and ya hear what ya wanna hear."

Yeh, most of those aren't really "naughties".

- It was definitely his knee.
- It did say SFX
- It isn't a penis, just the animators were rushing as they had little time left.


one knee?

ok, they admit it spelling sfx? why would it spell sfx?
sex sells...


Meanwhile. Back at the Priest's engorged member (that's what she said)...

I read the Snopes article and I definitely agree with NE that you definitely DO see what you want to see... But there's a point where I sit back and I think about the work that goes into animation (especially old timey animation) and how incredibly meticulous and purposeful each panel is. If you truly think about it, when the artist was designing the Priest, he could have positioned him in any way, shape, or form that he wanted to. The fact of the matter is, when the priest turns in the movie, it appears as though a certain part of him grows. The animator could have chosen not to display one knee or not to have the Priest standing in profile... But this was a purposeful choice.

The same puzzling argument is made for the leaves on the wind in the Lion King. The animator could have rearranged those leaves in any completely random way, shape or form that they could... Why would they purposely arrange them (not only arrange them, but animate them to move into a specific position) if not with an ulterior motive?

It's this train of thought that makes me lean more towards the animator's mischief rather than misguided fanboys and cult rumormill enthusiasts.

[neverending]

Well, not really, when you think about an animation FACTORY, such as Disney, where thousands of animators work on a project, it seems a bit far fetched. You've got character designers, character animators, facial animators, key animators, in-betweeners, backgrounders, colorists- each working on their own tight deadlines, and hoping like hell they're doing a good enough job the new intern from Loyola-Marymount won't take their job...

You got one guy drawing the mouths, one guy drawing the arms, one guy drawing the bottom half of one character, another guy drawing the top half, another crew doing the inking on a cell over the pencil drawings, another crew filling in the actions between the key animators frames- every artist concentrating on getting their particular step done on schedule- it seems pretty silly that any one artist is going to put the rest of the project in jeopardy by replacing a knee with a penis.

Couple that with some people's need to see everything that's longer than it is wide as a penis- especially if it's in a Disney cartoon that you've slowed down and stared at obsessively for hours- it just all seems like much ado about nothing to me.

[ferretchucker]

The same puzzling argument is made for the leaves on the wind in the Lion King. The animator could have rearranged those leaves in any completely random way, shape or form that they could... Why would they purposely arrange them (not only arrange them, but animate them to move into a specific position) if not with an ulterior motive?



If by the leaves you mean the dust, as I stated, they were meant to be spelling SFX, as in Special Effects and it was just something the animators wanted, almost like a cartoonist writing their name in the bottom corner of a comic strip.

[urgeok2]

If by the leaves you mean the dust, as I stated, they were meant to be spelling SFX, as in Special Effects and it was just something the animators wanted, almost like a cartoonist writing their name in the bottom corner of a comic strip.



why would you mention special effects - in a cartoon ?

[ferretchucker]

Maybe the animator's last name was Slfergunschplagun and it wouldn't fit. I don't know why those chose that, but I don't see what the point in putting the word Sex in a cartoon is. What benefit could it possibly have?

[_____V_____]

Maybe the animator's last name was Slfergunschplagun and it wouldn't fit. I don't know why those chose that, but I don't see what the point in putting the word Sex in a cartoon is. What benefit could it possibly have?

Exactly.

Dont believe everything you see, my young English whipper-snapper. People use much more imagination than they have, to make a mountain out of a molehill.

Sadly, this happens a lot. "An idle mind is a Devil's workshop", or so they say.

[ferretchucker]

Exactly.

Dont believe everything you see, my young English whipper-snapper. People use much more imagination than they have, to make a mountain out of a molehill.

Sadly, this happens a lot. "An idle mind is a Devil's workshop", or so they say.

And a happy mind is Santa's workshop.


And who was looking at the shapes the dust formed for a split second anyway? They must have been playing it frame by frame. Same with The Rescuers.