bloodrayne
05-06-2007, 10:51 AM
The New York Observer Goes Anti-Bruce
The New York Observer had a completely negative review of Spider-Man 3 and also started spreading some Bruce Campbell hate with the following comment regarding Bruce's cameo in the upcoming film:
"There is one long, irrelevant and disruptive sequence in which no-talent Raimi sidekick Bruce Campbell appears as a French waiter that makes you wonder what these people were swallowing besides designer water."
I've probably come across hundred's of reviews for Spider-Man 3 with Bruce Campbell being mentioned and this was the only one that had something negative to say about Bruce. Right before reading The New York Observer review, I read the Boston Herald's review of Spider-Man 3 in which they said that Bruce Campbell was a "good luck charm" for Sam Raimi movies. Bottom line, I know I have my biases but, screw The New York Observer. Hail To The King, Bruce Campbell.
Spiderman Bashing (http://www.observer.com/2007/spidey-s-back-caught-350-million-web)
The New York Observer had a completely negative review of Spider-Man 3 and also started spreading some Bruce Campbell hate with the following comment regarding Bruce's cameo in the upcoming film:
"There is one long, irrelevant and disruptive sequence in which no-talent Raimi sidekick Bruce Campbell appears as a French waiter that makes you wonder what these people were swallowing besides designer water."
I've probably come across hundred's of reviews for Spider-Man 3 with Bruce Campbell being mentioned and this was the only one that had something negative to say about Bruce. Right before reading The New York Observer review, I read the Boston Herald's review of Spider-Man 3 in which they said that Bruce Campbell was a "good luck charm" for Sam Raimi movies. Bottom line, I know I have my biases but, screw The New York Observer. Hail To The King, Bruce Campbell.
Spiderman Bashing (http://www.observer.com/2007/spidey-s-back-caught-350-million-web)