View Full Version : *Saw 3 SPOILERS* Well shit the bed, Saw IV
pt447
10-31-2006, 11:45 AM
Shock! "Saw" No. 4 set for release next Halloween
Tuesday October 31 3:19 AM ET
Perhaps inevitably, the record-breaking box office launch of "Saw III" has inspired the film's distributor to order a fourth installment of the R-rated horror series.
According to final data issued Monday, the film earned $33.61 million during its first three days, a record for both Lionsgate and for the franchise, but off $700,000 from the three-day estimate the studio published Sunday.
"Saw III" received an overall grade of B from exit pollster CinemaScore. With a hefty per-screen average of $10,612, the film was best received by the under-25 crowd, which was divided pretty evenly male-female. "Saw III" stars Tobin Bell and Shawnee Smith as serial killers. Another sequel is on tap for next Halloween.
well, i have to say... i'm not sure what to think. if the first 3 were ordered as a set, a complete trilogy, that means the story was intende for those 3 movies. the idea of adding a fourth movie, after the fact, doesn't bode well for the storyline...:mad:
JP500
10-31-2006, 11:51 AM
I was hopeing they wouldn't make a 4th one.It should be just left as a trilogy.
Vodstok
10-31-2006, 11:57 AM
they cost nest to nothing as movies go and pull in tons of money... they will continue to milk it until it stops being profitable, and then it may go straight to dvd...
pt447
10-31-2006, 01:15 PM
like i already said... the fact is, they were intended, and conceived as a trilogy, so now, whatever they do, it'll felt tagged on. sure, they left III open, but with Jigsaw dead... what's the point? none, just cash... bastards...
joshaube
10-31-2006, 03:34 PM
SAW was never, ever intended to be a trilogy. I get this information from an interview with the creative persons behind the original SAW. It was intended soley as a movie to get their names out there. A movie so they could make a better movie later on. To their suprise, SAW became the hit they were trying to make with the money they planned on making after SAW. If you understand that.
BY THE FUCKING WAY.
THANKS FOR THE SPOILER JACKASS.
WARNING WARNING WARNING
IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN SAW 3, DON'T READ THE FUCKING POST ABOVE THIS ONE.
The_Return
10-31-2006, 03:55 PM
like i already said... the fact is, they were intended, and conceived as a trilogy, so now, whatever they do, it'll felt tagged on. sure, they left III open, but with Jigsaw dead... what's the point? none, just cash... bastards...
I agree with Josh, how 'bout a Spoiler Warning next time?
Fuck, the movie's been out for what, 5 days? We dont all live at the theatre, most of us dont go see a movie the day it fucking comes out.
Thanks for ruining my day asshole:mad:
AmericanManiac
10-31-2006, 06:22 PM
Well you should of seen it coming because tobin bell signed on for I think it was 4 or 5 saws when he did the first.
Despare
10-31-2006, 07:23 PM
As long as they continue to be good and introduce some (fairly) fresh ideas I say go for it. I don't understand the hate some people feel toward franchises that spawn sequels as long as their good. When they stop being good, I stop watching.
Morbid Fantasy
10-31-2006, 08:03 PM
If they keep managing to bust out great movies like the first three, then I don't have a problem with it. I will continue to be a fan. But if they start to get even slightly stale I'll object to them making more.
weevus897
11-01-2006, 09:38 PM
well here we go its officially becoming a horror franchise...
the_real_linda
11-02-2006, 01:36 AM
no no no no NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! after watching the 3rd film its a perfect trilogy........it rounds up the other 2 and explains or you could say delves into stuff so the other two are clearer....its just tied up perfect at the end...no no no please i love these films tooooooo frakkin much for them to be ruined.
Burning in Hell
11-02-2006, 08:19 AM
Yeah, No. III was so strong and closed the chapter so perfectly that I'm very worried about a 4th and 5th one :confused:
the_real_linda
11-04-2006, 04:03 AM
but things were left unanswered....whos jigsaws mysterious blonde woman....hmmmmmmmmm? and jeffs daughter cant just die in their....it could be a prequel but doubt it and please dont let amanda be dead.....serioulsy tisnt fair!
pt447
11-04-2006, 09:09 AM
i don't know why everyone needs answers so badly... what happened to mystery, cliffhangers, and wonder? i think it should have ended there. now, it's just another cash cow and the plot will suffer!
the_real_linda
11-05-2006, 11:21 AM
i was saying bout things being unanswered cause i think it gives the studios a justification for another film but i like things left open....noel in film class on friday was saying how we like when films are rounded up and all questions are answered...like the audience likes to see a dilema sorted, i dont....its so much more interesting with things left open.....and i think saw should be left at the third one....but i will see the fourth one.....damn me
melaniepants
11-05-2006, 01:15 PM
They should not make a saw 4. that would be retarted. The third movie wrapped everything up. if they made a 4th i think it would be a disaster
the_real_linda
11-05-2006, 03:57 PM
no it didnt wrap everything up....more and more is left open if u over analyse it like i do but i like it like that and it should be left.....please for fraks sake leave the films as they are:eek: