View Full Version : Spider-Man 3
Prelude95Si
04-04-2007, 08:49 PM
Play Spider-Man vs. Venom Multi-Player Game
The Ultimate Battle
Can't wait for the Spider-Man 3 game to come out, well heres a chance to get in on some Spider-Man 3 action.
http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/spiderman3/mp_game/
cryptkeeper666
04-07-2007, 04:54 PM
I liked the 1st one. and two i liked too and thought
which was at it's best. but for part 3. We all can't say
for sure until we actually see it. We all may be expecting
a lot from the film but we just half to wait and see for now.
Prelude95Si
04-20-2007, 06:21 PM
Sam Raimi Confirms Spidey 4, 5 and 6!
Source: Heather Newgen April 20, 2007
At the Los Angeles press junket today, Spider-Man 3 director Sam Raimi confirmed that Sony Pictures is doing a 4th, 5th and 6th installment of the popular franchise.
We'll have his exact words shortly, but Raimi said that he hasn't had time to think of any involvement and he doesn't want to presume Sony would want him to direct.
He said there has to be a good story to tell and that "it'd be very hard to say goodbye to 'Spider Man.'"
Sounds like Sony is really confiedent that #3 will do well. Personally I'm sick of all the advertisments and the number of trailers. I really think that they should not have shown Venom in any of the trailers, he should have been a surprise.
Dante'sInferno
04-20-2007, 08:39 PM
"crosses finger that this will be better then the first two,and ties,if not surpasses batman beings"
Kane_Hodder
04-22-2007, 02:18 AM
4, 5 & 6? Sony is hellbent on burying the franchise for good.
Phalanx
04-22-2007, 07:34 AM
Why?
The comic has been around since sometime in the 60's...it's not like they're basing it on some short-lived serial...it's multiple series that make up over 3000 comics. There's stories yet to tell, and the movies they've made thus far have only (despite certain storyline differences) scratched the surface.
I would prefer to see some kind've ongoing series with a bigger budget as opposed to movies (even if in animated form), but, if it's gotta be movies, then I've no objection.
I personally think that the second one was better than the first, and if the third follows along those lines, I see no reason whatsoever to dump the franchise
Prelude95Si
04-23-2007, 07:31 PM
Why?
The comic has been around since sometime in the 60's...it's not like they're basing it on some short-lived serial...it's multiple series that make up over 3000 comics. There's stories yet to tell, and the movies they've made thus far have only (despite certain storyline differences) scratched the surface.
I would prefer to see some kind've ongoing series with a bigger budget as opposed to movies (even if in animated form), but, if it's gotta be movies, then I've no objection.
I personally think that the second one was better than the first, and if the third follows along those lines, I see no reason whatsoever to dump the franchise
I agree, look at Bond, he's been around since the 60's with 21 films and a Warne Bros. knock-off. And Bond is almost the same story over and over, and people like me still love it!
Prelude95Si
04-29-2007, 11:06 AM
New Spider-Man 3 Videos
Source: theamazingspideremil, thejon7, Anthony Nardelli April 29, 2007
Only a little over four days to go fans!
You can now watch the sneak peek of Spider-Man 3 that aired on Starz last night in three parts: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3.
Also, a new Venom TV spot is available
DO NOT WATCH IF YOU DON'T WANT SPOLIERS!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB2Ix0-jkCw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNLckbdT5ZI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vO5b7wJZWQw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gdXJK8vNl0
walesboy
05-01-2007, 05:30 AM
sorry to spoil it for ya but i've seen it an gwen stacy gets killed by the green gobelin in sp3 an venom is there but not till the end really but great film though just get rid of kirsten dunst really pecking my head now lol
Prelude95Si
05-02-2007, 06:23 AM
sorry to spoil it for ya but i've seen it an gwen stacy gets killed by the green gobelin in sp3 an venom is there but not till the end really but great film though just get rid of kirsten dunst really pecking my head now lol
Mit I suggest putting a bigger spoiler warning next time. Like underline spolier or put it in big letters.
Prelude95Si
05-03-2007, 07:21 AM
$29.2 Million for Spidey Overseas in 1 Day
Source: The Hollywood Reporter May 2, 2007
The Hollywood Reporter says that Spider-Man 3 has earned $29.2 million in 16 overseas markets, topping Spider-Man 2's bow in the same territories by 86% and that of the original by 175%.
"The bottom line," Sony Pictures Entertainment vice chairman Jeff Blake said, "is that 10 of the 16 openings had the biggest opening day of all time."
All of the 16 bows of the third film beat the openings days of both Spider-Man 2 ($15.6 million) and the initial Spider-Man ($10.6 million), bested the combined gross of both previous films, and that four territories came up with their biggest single days of all time.
Sony said France's $6.1 million represented the country's biggest opening day of all time, beating Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire ($3.9 million), local blockbuster Taxi 2 ($4.5 million) and the combined opening day takes of Spidey 1 and 2 ($4.9 million).
Germany ($4.6 million) and Japan ($3.7 million) each logged their biggest-ever Tuesday openings, while Italy ($4 million) and Korea ($3.4 million) achieved their biggest openings of all time.
Records also were set in Austria, Belgium, Holland, Switzerland, Egypt, Singapore, the Philippines, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Thailand.
"By Sunday, we will have opened in 107 countries around the world, including the United States and Canada," Blake said.
Prelude95Si
05-08-2007, 07:00 AM
Spider-Man 3 Earns Record-Breaking $382M Worldwide
It about made its budget back in one weekend.
phantomstranger
05-09-2007, 09:08 AM
(the following may contain spoilers)
First let me say, I enjoyed "Spidey 3", I didn't feel like my time had been wasted or that I wanted my money back, but of the three "Spider-Man" films so far, "3" is the weakest. I think they tried to cram too much into this film. Too many villians, all the problems with Mary Jane and they did damn little with the Gwen Stacy plot (James Cromwell as Captain Stacy was totally wasted in this film, hope he does more in part 4) and they did the one thing that I truly hate in superhero movies, they had the hero (and villians) running around in public and fighting without the mask. I just hate that. I'm a comic geek I want to see the superhero's and bad guys in full costumes.Overall, it was an okay movie, but I hope they do better in part 4
bloody_ribcut
05-09-2007, 10:07 AM
i didnt pay for 3, 4 i would.
BASSI
05-09-2007, 10:22 AM
i think it was really good
like as much as i like 1
but not seen 2 yet
N2NOther
05-10-2007, 02:16 PM
Didn't like it when I first saw it and now, with contemplation, I flat-out hate it. This movie was terrible.
Angra
05-10-2007, 02:52 PM
Haven't seen it, but my cousin (being a fan of the first one) thought it was horrible.
Shadow
05-11-2007, 03:13 AM
I was disappointed. Overall an ok film but not what I wanted in a Spidey film. As some have already said there was too much going on, too many villains. Venom looked great was impressed with that. Is Mary Jane not dead yet please do away with her I don't know about you but I want to see spider-man not a failed actress. It seemed to drag on a bit for me, the whole time I was waiting for fights that just where not happening. The fights that did happen where good though. In a way I agree that masks should not be removed however in this film I think it made a point, as it showed each of the characters clearer. Oh and Peter strutting his stuff down the street oh please.
Sick_As_Fuck
05-13-2007, 02:38 PM
I enjoyed it for the fight scenes and Venom, but there was WAY too much going on. Including Sandman was completely and totally unneccesary. They should've had Harry kill off Mary Jane which would've done the job of getting Peter in a rage, then have Peter kill or permanently immobilize Harry, then have a fantastic one-on-one Spidey v. Venom battle at the end. Bleh! A Spidey 4 without Dunst would be A-OK with me. I'm kind of even interested in seeing what someone else aside from Raimi would do with it, too. Definitely need Tobey back, though.
Prelude95Si
05-16-2007, 06:16 AM
May contain spoilers
So visually the movie was great, really enjoyed the fight scenes, personally I thought the fight with Venom could have been better. The movie started out good, there was character development with Sandman and they made you feel for his situation and made him human instead of just the next villain in the Rogue gallery. I liked the fact that Harry and Peter had their fights out of costume b/c there fight wasn't for action value alone, it was a fight between 2 best friends who have had a falling out and you need to see the emotions of their faces as they fight, in both fights. Like the fight in the Osborn house, it was important to see the blackness around Peter's eyes and the lack of emotion Peter shows when he throws the pumpkin bomb back at Harry, it shows how deeply the suit has consumed Peter and how much he has imbraced it.
Down sides to this movie. It had a lot going on, but for awhile it transitioned o.k. but then we get Harry getting a bump on the head and then he doesn't remeber anything. Stupid. It caused a break in the flow of the film b/c then when he remebers its kind of out of place, it was like out of no where. Personally I just think that felt odd. Then, the butler is the one who convences Harry to go help Peter, WTF! I mean Harry helping Peter in the first place was a dumb idea atleast from a comic character persective. But in terms of the movie world it worked, b/c it was like the Osborn story coming full circle, they started as best friends they ended as best friends.
I couldn't stand Venom's head, it was like he had Hydrocephaly (big head) and a small chin. Then I felt that Venom should have had a different voice, with Topher's voice I just didn't feel like I was listening to Venom. Speaking of Topher, Brock was a little winny bitch, it drove me nuts. Especially the church scene, when he goes there to ask God to kill Parker. Yuk!
But overall the movie was decent, I say its the worst in the series thus far. But its watchable.
Oh and by the way, they kind of ruined Dr. Conners, he was a Physacist and admitted it to Parker. Therefore there is no reason for him to experiment with Reptiles. He wouldn't know anything about it b/c thats Biology not Physics. Good job Rami!
stubbornforgey
05-16-2007, 06:05 PM
oooooooooh em sorry to say..the movie just bored the hell out of me.
Was probably one of the worst movies i had seen to date.
The fight scenes were over glorified..i hated it .
The whole plot..the whole amnesia thing..everything... :rolleyes:
to be honest..halfway through the movie i ended up by listening to my ipod
Dante'sInferno
05-16-2007, 07:13 PM
oooooooooh em sorry to say..the movie just bored the hell out of me.
Was probably one of the worst movies i had seen to date.
The fight scenes were over glorified..i hated it .
The whole plot..the whole amnesia thing..everything... :rolleyes:
to be honest..halfway through the movie i ended up by listening to my ipodI agree!Probly one of the biggest dissapointments EVER.
bloody_ribcut
05-17-2007, 04:15 AM
oooooooooh em sorry to say..the movie just bored the hell out of me.
Was probably one of the worst movies i had seen to date.
The fight scenes were over glorified..i hated it .
The whole plot..the whole amnesia thing..everything... :rolleyes:
to be honest..halfway through the movie i ended up by listening to my ipod
so you paid money to see it in a theatre and started listening to your ipod?
coocoo
Sick_As_Fuck
05-17-2007, 01:24 PM
LOL, why didn't you just walk out?
the_real_linda
05-21-2007, 04:54 PM
so you paid money to see it in a theatre and started listening to your ipod?
coocoo
does anyone enjoy new films????? lol :D
scaryben
05-26-2007, 10:44 PM
I agree!Probly one of the biggest dissapointments EVER.
I agree. was a little saddened by this one. oh well :( ...still love spidey tho