Log in

View Full Version : When Hell freezes over...


alkytrio666
12-15-2005, 10:07 AM
What's the one horror movie you'd just kill for them NOT to remake it. The one you'd want them never to try again.

Mine would be The Shining (yes, I know, but the T.V. version doesn't count...) or An American Werewolf In London.

stubbornforgey
12-15-2005, 10:10 AM
THE SHINING!!!!
loooooooooooooooooool

em down with you on that one.

oh and IT'

'stubborn steps into the shadow':D

SKOOFx
12-15-2005, 10:27 AM
I like the tv version of the shinning better..yeah you read right.

It matches the book PERFECTLY.

X¤MurderDoll¤X
12-15-2005, 10:39 AM
I'll say the Shining, they probably will remake it though.

noctuary
12-15-2005, 10:47 AM
Originally posted by SKOOFx
I like the tv version of the shinning better..yeah you read right.

It matches the book PERFECTLY.
WHAT!? :eek: :mad:

Anyway, I really hope we never see an Americanized version of Audition. Since it's already a little older, there's probably not much chance of it, thankfully.

Haunted
12-15-2005, 11:30 AM
You know, there's not a movie I hold sacred enough to not be able to stomache a remake EXCEPT maybe The Exorcist. I don't know how they could do it, but you can bet your sweet bippies that somewhere in film-land somebody is pondering what I'm pondering...and they disagree with me.

Personally, and I've said this before, I think a remake of The Thing and Rosemary's Baby would be in order. With the visual abilities they have today, they could really spruce The Thing, and with the share of more actresses we sure as hell could get a better main character than Mia-fucking-Farrow. (Not to mention that our conceptualization of the Devil has matured)

ItsAlive75
12-15-2005, 12:01 PM
"Freaks" could never be redone... ever.

newb
12-15-2005, 12:03 PM
Originally posted by Haunted
You know, there's not a movie I hold sacred enough to not be able to stomache a remake EXCEPT maybe The Exorcist. I don't know how they could do it, but you can bet your sweet bippies that somewhere in film-land somebody is pondering what I'm pondering...and they disagree with me.

Personally, and I've said this before, I think a remake of The Thing and Rosemary's Baby would be in order. With the visual abilities they have today, they could really spruce The Thing, and with the share of more actresses we sure as hell could get a better main character than Mia-fucking-Farrow. (Not to mention that our conceptualization of the Devil has matured)


NO....Don't touch The Thing. It would be done with crappy CGI, and i won't stand for that.

The_Return
12-15-2005, 12:19 PM
-The Abominable Dr. Phibes

-Theatre of Blood

scottingraham
12-15-2005, 12:26 PM
Halloween its perfect and should not be messed up by a remake!

MoonLit Meadow
12-15-2005, 01:00 PM
Suspiria.

AND OF COURSE.....FRIGHT NIGHT ;)

Yellow Jacket
12-15-2005, 01:01 PM
- The Exorcist

- The Omen

-The Shining

If any director touches these movies, I'll kick their asses!

Despare
12-15-2005, 01:37 PM
I liked the TV Shining better too, not that the other one was bad by ANY means but it was just so much closer to the book. Anyway, I know they're supposed to remake Evil Dead and I've come to terms with that but I REALLY don't want them to remake Army of Darkness.

filmmaker2
12-15-2005, 01:43 PM
Well, now that I've seen the new KING KONG, I really wish they hadn't made it. Thought it was awful! The script could have been a lot better than what they went with. Jack Black was terribly miscast. Movie is too long, even though it looks great with fantastic effects.

It did feature lots of monsters, which generally speaking were very well done and scary. But I thought the movie was a poo poo. Sorry, Peter Jackson! Lord of the Rings was far, far better IMO.

stubbornforgey
12-15-2005, 02:16 PM
Finally..!!somebody who speaks my veiws on this ..to the tee..

long and drawn out..
joe black...oh why lord

The_Return
12-15-2005, 02:33 PM
Originally posted by stubbornforgey
Finally..!!somebody who speaks my veiws on this ..to the tee..

long and drawn out..
joe black...oh why lord

Jack, not Joe

Haunted
12-15-2005, 02:43 PM
Originally posted by newb
NO....Don't touch The Thing. It would be done with crappy CGI, and i won't stand for that.

Okay okay okay! Relax. No remake. I see your point. CGI thing...bad. Honestly I wasn't even thinking cgi, but... shit I don't know.

You kinda hit on a point, though, Newb.... When I was little I wanted to be a makeup artist (still might try), but today, they don't use as many creaters and artists because it's all done by computer. I mean movies look more "real," but some of the magic is gone.


Although I will say that zombies have evolved nicely.

stubbornforgey
12-15-2005, 04:17 PM
LOL..
well excuse me .
humble apology
will never do it again ..


oh and btw

The_Return
12-15-2005, 04:25 PM
Originally posted by stubbornforgey
oh and IT'


I think "IT" could do with a proper film version. If Tim Curry would still play Pennywise, it could be great

Yellow Jacket
12-15-2005, 04:30 PM
Originally posted by The_Return
I think "IT" could do with a proper film version. If Tim Curry would still play Pennywise, it could be great

I agree with you on that one. But, if Tim Curry doesn't play Pennywise, then the movie wouldn't have anything going for it and I'd probably take a shit on it! :p

MisterSadistro
12-15-2005, 07:00 PM
There's only one movie I want to remake for all the right reasons (and have half the script written already). If it ain't broke though, don't fix it.
CK

Zero
12-16-2005, 04:54 AM
hmm, by The Thing do you all mean the 1951 original - or the Carpenter remake??

my pick would the The Silence of the Lambs - i can see hollywood wanting to remake it at some point - with kirsten dunst and vince vaughn as clarice and hannibal - and maybe ashton kutcher could play buffalo bill. . .

alkytrio666
12-16-2005, 09:33 AM
Originally posted by ItsAlive75
"Freaks" could never be redone... ever.

oooh, good one! It's only a matter of time, but you just can't do that one the way it was meant to be again. Ever.

Great point.

Haunted
12-16-2005, 09:37 AM
Originally posted by Zero
hmm, by The Thing do you all mean the 1951 original - or the Carpenter remake??

my pick would the The Silence of the Lambs - i can see hollywood wanting to remake it at some point - with kirsten dunst and vince vaughn as clarice and hannibal - and maybe ashton kutcher could play buffalo bill. . .

First: Neither... I hear Newb's pleas (threats) and I aquiesce.

Second... I would march on Hollywood with a thousand raging horror fanatics strong to stomp the shit outta someone. Mark Silence of the Lambs up there with my sacred Exorcist.

Zombee
12-16-2005, 09:42 AM
I dont mind remakes at all..ever. You just need to seperate the two movies, if it means that much to you it should be even easier to remember they are two different movies. I never understood the whole art-fag mentality surrounding remakes. Its really not as bad or serious as you might think.

Zero
12-16-2005, 10:57 AM
Originally posted by Haunted
First: Neither... I hear Newb's pleas (threats) and I aquiesce.

Second... I would march on Hollywood with a thousand raging horror fanatics strong to stomp the shit outta someone. Mark Silence of the Lambs up there with my sacred Exorcist.

lol - i can see the angry mob now :D

OctaviusHunter
12-17-2005, 08:17 PM
poltergeist and nightmare 1 should not be touched both of them were wonderful and even though some great new visuals could be done with both of them, any higher tech would ruin them.

1beastieibe
12-17-2005, 08:30 PM
- The Exorcist
- The Omen
-The Shining
If any director touches these movies, I'll kick their asses

They are already in the process of remaking the OMEN

MichaelMyers
12-17-2005, 08:32 PM
House of the Dead

MoonLit Meadow
12-17-2005, 10:32 PM
Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
IMO, every movie in the world should be remade..............just to piss you all off.:p



Get used to it.......change is inevitable. Upgrading doesnt just happen in technology. It happens in EVERYTHING. We......or more, YOU, cant do a damn thing about it. It changes with generations, and sorry to break the news sooooo early, it's gonna continue. MY GOD MOVE ON!!!! Bitch, if you must, but yet another news flash...............the producers, backers and actors, dont care. So see it if ya want. and dont see it if ya want, but it's gonna happen for this, the next, and the next generation. So they can continue to know where it all began.......because when they see the remake, they'll keep the originals alive. They'l wanna know where the remakes came from. See, you all see it as butchering classics........I see it as a learning experience for the deprived. The younger generation that sees it and finds out that "WHOA!!!!! This is a remake? I have to see the previous one, and the one before that", and so on and so on. So take heed.....Hollyweird, or any other moviemaking business could care less what you think. It will continue. And by all means, opinions are cool, dont get me wrong. But complaining gets someone else to want to prove you wrong. So I say, PLEASE continue complaining, I wanna see more remakes.:D

Good points...but they still better not touch suspiria or fright night;) :p

MoonLit Meadow
12-17-2005, 10:41 PM
Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
Sweetie......NEWS FLASH........they didnt exactly cause a MAJOR impact. I doubt anyone is really concerned about remaking them. :p











































EVERYONE: Please not the smiley.





























God, I hate having to justify my post.:rolleyes:

LOL. Well, okay...maybe "Fright Night" didn't make a huge impact...but it's my faaaaaaavorite:D Therefore, everyone's grubby fingers better stay away from it. :p

MoonLit Meadow
12-17-2005, 10:46 PM
Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
IMO, there isnt a soul in the world that can play Roddy Mcdowall's part! But I'd like to see someone try.:p


Very true...or Chris Sarandon...RAWWWWWR ;):p

AUSTIN316426808
12-18-2005, 02:34 AM
Nosferatu

Se7en

Haunted
12-18-2005, 05:56 AM
Haven't they already sorta kinda made a sorta kinda remake of Nosferatu? I think most people thought it was stupid too.

Moonlit, what's ol' Chris up to these days? I haven't seen him in many films.

AUSTIN316426808
12-18-2005, 06:00 AM
Kairo

The_Return
12-18-2005, 06:08 AM
Originally posted by Haunted
Moonlit, what's ol' Chris up to these days? I haven't seen him in many films.

I saw him in a pretty bad murder-mystery type flick not too long ago. The Reaper, it was called. It was bacically a rip-off of Stephen King's tormented author stories.

Despare
12-18-2005, 06:27 AM
You're kidding about Kairo right? Because it's already being remade, with the girl from Veronica Mars. I hope you were kidding because if not you're now dissapointed and won't go see "Pulse".

VampiricClown
12-18-2005, 08:19 AM
-Halloween

-Nightmare On Elm Street

That's more than one..... But I thought both of these were great movies.

alkytrio666
12-18-2005, 09:31 AM
How about Jaws?

Psycho shouldn't have been remade...I refuse to see the Vince Vaugh version.

No one should have touched that. Fucking stuck-up bastards.

zwoti
12-18-2005, 01:14 PM
Originally posted by AUSTIN316426808
Nosferatu

directed by werner herzog


starring klaus kinski

PR3SSUR3
12-18-2005, 01:20 PM
I like the tv version of the shinning better..yeah you read right

"Och! You haven't heard the last o' Willie!"

http://www.geocities.com/groundskeeper3/episodes.html

:p

Get used to it.......change is inevitable. Upgrading doesnt just happen in technology. It happens in EVERYTHING. We......or more, YOU, cant do a damn thing about it. It changes with generations, and sorry to break the news sooooo early, it's gonna continue. MY GOD MOVE ON!!!! Bitch, if you must, but yet another news flash...............the producers, backers and actors, dont care. So see it if ya want. and dont see it if ya want, but it's gonna happen for this, the next, and the next generation. So they can continue to know where it all began.......because when they see the remake, they'll keep the originals alive. They'l wanna know where the remakes came from. See, you all see it as butchering classics........I see it as a learning experience for the deprived. The younger generation that sees it and finds out that "WHOA!!!!! This is a remake? I have to see the previous one, and the one before that", and so on and so on. So take heed.....Hollyweird, or any other moviemaking business could care less what you think. It will continue. And by all means, opinions are cool, dont get me wrong. But complaining gets someone else to want to prove you wrong. So I say, PLEASE continue complaining, I wanna see more remakes.

You're trying to say everything, but ended up saying nothing at all.

:D

stubbornforgey
12-18-2005, 01:28 PM
re makes..
when they do re makes ..they should keep in mind the original storyline and not add
thier own bullshit.
When seeing a remake ..em like ..wha..
that never happened in the original ..etc.
Like reading a book ..then seeing it up on screen ..'sic' flowers in the attic' one good example..and Silence of the Lambs'
Your figuring ...ooh i enjoyed the book...then the movie must be damned awesome too..
wrong !!in most cases..

MoonLit Meadow
12-18-2005, 03:50 PM
Originally posted by The_Return
I saw him in a pretty bad murder-mystery type flick not too long ago. The Reaper, it was called. It was bacically a rip-off of Stephen King's tormented author stories.


Pretty bad, eh? SOUNDS GOOD TO ME!!!! ;):p

Haunted, I'm really not sure what he's up to either :( Probably doing plays or something...I'm pretty sure that's what happens once you stop getting offered movie roles:p

Yellow Jacket
12-18-2005, 03:54 PM
Originally posted by stubbornforgey
re makes..
when they do re makes ..they should keep in mind the original storyline and not add
thier own bullshit.
When seeing a remake ..em like ..wha..
that never happened in the original ..etc.
Like reading a book ..then seeing it up on screen ..'sic' flowers in the attic' one good example..and Silence of the Lambs'
Your figuring ...ooh i enjoyed the book...then the movie must be damned awesome too..
wrong !!in most cases..

I see where you're coming from, but if they didn't add any new material, then people would get bored, and probably pissed, because they just coughed out money to see something they already have in their collection. I'm not saying that remakes should be chock-fulled with new and improved stuff. I'm just saying that adding a few new things in a remake isn't a bad idea. Now, the movie version of a book shouldn't have anything new added to it (unless it needs it desperatly) because you want to see something you read be performed for you. You don't want anything new because you never seen what you read. You just used your imagine. It's a lot different than a remake.

AUSTIN316426808
12-18-2005, 04:22 PM
Originally posted by zwoti
directed by werner herzog


starring klaus kinski



I remember now,looked it up after reading haunted's post,never seen it but remember passing by it numerous times in blockbuster. Probably wont like it but I'll give any movie a chance.

AUSTIN316426808
12-18-2005, 04:24 PM
Originally posted by Despare
You're kidding about Kairo right? Because it's already being remade, with the girl from Veronica Mars. I hope you were kidding because if not you're now dissapointed and won't go see "Pulse".


I know,I was just answering the thread question.

AUSTIN316426808
12-18-2005, 04:27 PM
Originally posted by trippin_the_rif
Sweetie......NEWS FLASH........they didnt exactly cause a MAJOR impact. I doubt anyone is really concerned about remaking them. :p



Neither did the Fog.